20

Imagine, they put him in a God like position that even when he wants to deal with  something bad or degrading he had did or does to my character, he makes some balance that with degrading themselves while  he stays in his high and above position.    

19

I made the guy that offer, after all what he did, in front of everybody trying to show who would still continue to support him escaping the consequences of taking the arrogant careless path  he chose. It turned out that they break the scale of shamelessness for him and move on without even noticing. With their way of holding the guy above being responsible, their support is almost like calling on the other side to join them in worshiping a new God.  

  

18

I have recently noticed how hard it is to find where the expression "fighting for the soul" of something can fit more than the situation here. The soul of this country was robbed and its body lays under some of the highest mountains of waste on the earth with the level of corruption out there. From democracy to basic real existence, this country is nothing more than a joke and a toy to the corruption forces and their psychotic desires.

17

In general, I am not willing to take as external, and therefore real, what is internal to this guy's game.

16

Of course for each his own choices. But I am not inclined to take more than what is as little as possible in making this guy take credit for achievements inside with his lead and control, using things done for the sake of others with him. No, he took everybody and made them come through him isolating me from their representations for themselves in the matter.  

15

5/6 of the first offer I made the guy was based on an amount he seemed to be showing himself to those on the other side as being ready to settle for before the decision on my petition and what followed later. If it were me in the position of those on the other side, I would have taken the guy on that claim and opened my own communication path to the other side before letting him add one mess after another.

[(added 12/18/15) 5/6 of the first offer I made the guy was based on an amount he seemed to be publicly showing himself ..]

14

Before deciding on the path of playing such games, I wonder, who in his right mind would have depended on this corruption guy to be the one, and only one, in the middle communicating a solution that should have brought the two sides together here, if an alternative was possible,?

Notice how the corruption guy here successfully isolated me and prevented the connection of the minds of the two parties, directly or through an intermediary, even for one second without his knowledge. That is how psychos take control of the world.       

13

It is not even like that I barely hold myself from seeing other events of the kind as fake then cross that line here. On the contrary, even with an event like that of the prevention of the attack in a train in France , which is relatively much easier to be fabricated, I never feel anything calling on me to see it as fake. On the other hand, with the two events I mentioned below, and other fabricated domestic attacks here, I never feel any calling on me to see them as real.

    

12

Before they attempt to play the game of what is real and what is fake on me here, had they yet at least realized the correct answer to this question with regard to the trial related to the case of the killing of Trayvon Martin in Florida? 

11

Let us state this clearly. The government with its partners fabricated the alleged attack in San Bernardino California and the one in Chattanooga Tennessee several months before. Aside from others, the guy in the white house and his FBI director  are themselves part of the game. 

It seems like the corruption guy started by himself fabricating stories like breach of data security at this or that company with the role of the government and its FBI being just toleration, at most. They then completely joined him in the alleged hacking of Sony and moved from there to the level described above. 

10

I did not catch the thing from the beginning but it sounded like they brought that FBI director to testify about that alleged attack in California. Too bad! Now I doubt the existence of California.

9

Again regarding the guy in the post below, although I may like to play along and talk to a ventriloquist's dummy, that does not necessarily mean I recognize its serious existence. He, made that statement about preventing some group from entering the country probably trying to show a reaction that would support the recent fabricated attack look real. But that intention was betrayed by how premature it sounded.      

8

Somebody has been using that guy currently claimed to be topping the republican candidate list to say things counter to his own intelligence which could be one of those examples demonstrating the unfair taxing on the poor.

It is unbelievable how the system here tolerates the invasion of this guy to my privacy as if I am an object he owns! 

Continuing from the post below:

In case somebody thinks otherwise, I did not change course from  a general talk like that because of that silencing reaction. No, I put an effort to avoid such talk because I recognized that this is a significantly different place to what I came from in how much the identity complex could use that causing injustice at the individual level.     

NBC TV Network did not change from its path by allowing that presidential candidate to host its show. It only provided help to those who did not already see the conspiracy between the two. It is a repetition of the one with that cooking lady I wrote about before . The guy who asked the question about Muslims was also not acting on his own and without arrangements with that candidate   

Having said that people may need to think before they seek equality by imitating the silencing reaction used in another group to prevent others from complaining against what is being done by members in it and  the inexcusable support to each other you see. Instead they may want to make a better use for the advantage of position that does not seek a diversion  from the issue.

A government watching and tolerating like this government is watching this guy having all the freedom he currently has over my Internet privacy is placing itself at the disgusting level of how a government should be. And no, having some celebrities complaining about how their accounts were hacked and the like does not balance things out by giving the excuse of widespread problem regardless of whether one thinks it was intended for that purpose or not. Nothing is like what has been happening here, and for years, with this guy's government granted privilege over my privacy.        

And these hacking stories from Target and the like to celebrities to North Korea with Sony and China with insurance companies or whatever and even some similar things attributed to ISIS were caused by him playing around and trying to distract others from his sever invading to my privacy and, at least with Sony's story, partly trying to show me his control and how much corrupted cooperation he can pull. 

What strengthened more my confidence in that or at least made me less hesitant to emphasize such view despite its megalomaniac look is the ease with which I saw him pull all the level of corruption I saw him create publicly in the past few months. 

Actually, with little attention to the history sequence of those hacking claims one can see how the claims were increasing in intensity as if somebody crossing one line after another while watching out for the reactions.  

This is not a government. This is an extremely dirty swamp of corruption we are trapped in and no body cares. Aside from other things, look at how long it has been like a public knowledge to them that this corruption guy is a permanent invader to my privacy over the Internet watching every thing I do and they are OK with it. 

I wonder how much the sinking to this level in morality and dignity with all this media fabricated stories and public conspiracy is enjoyable because it doesn't seem to serve any material purpose and much less the one it might have been intended for. However, and I repeat this again, in order not to make this abyss a bottomless one, at least a line should be drawn when it comes to such actions coming from the cops and the FBI or other entities trusted in applying and enforcing the law. 

  

I mentioned the time and the network in the previous post in order to help identify which episode of that show I was referring. The time is Eastern Time and the location, just in case that network programs can differ by location, is east Tennessee. 

At 12:30 am today I watched one of those Forensic Files shows aired on the Escape TV network. That show was about the killing of a girl, who was arrested for use of drugs, by her boyfriend when she was about to tell on him, according to the show in exchange for making a deal on her drug charges, for involvement in committing a murder in a black neighborhood, the thing that fits with him being accused as a white supremacist. The show was about how the advance analysis of tiny evidence from a refrigerator belonging to the boyfriend in which the body of that girl was kept for some time helped in convicting him as being the killer and how the police chief kept that refrigerator all that time despite providing no evidencing benefit.

After watching the show I suddenly noticed how it was left a big necessary question unanswered. How did the boyfriend know that the girl who was at police custody was about to tell on him for him to come pay her bail to take her home then kill her? 

Also the girl arrest for drug use in the home of the boyfriend where she was living happened when the cops came to talk with boyfriend about that murder and did not find him home. What police detectives concern themselves about the use of drugs by a person while they are in the process of investigating a homicide? On the other hand, that seems to fit with over compensating not finding the boyfriend at home as something arranged with the police. Or it could be that the girl was the real intended target of the visit by the police in order to keep her away from noticing what her boyfriend was doing by keeping her in prison for drug charges but that path fired back with her wanting to reveal what the boyfriend did . 

The show also talked about how the police chief was seen as behaving crazy or unreasonably trying to find the body of that girl which could be, together with the keeping of that refrigerator all that time, intended to compensate for less than serious investigation.The case was also resolved after the guy was already in jail and enough time had passed to disable the capability to prosecute the mother and sister of that guy, living in the same house, because of covering evidences of the killing and not reporting it.

In short, answering the main question about how the guy knew that the girl was about to tell on him negatively regarding the role of the cops in that can also find support in other things in the picture.

Was that girl betrayed to death by the cops themselves? Did the same people taking credit for prosecuting her killer knowingly conspired creating what led her to death ?

Of course this could be entirely wrong but I couldn't let that obvious question go without pointing it out despite speaking from my stage here.