58

So that guy now decides to stop the joke and start acting "presidential"? Did anyone tell him that we wanted to play games with him and that it should end whenever he wants it to end? Even worse it can hardly seems to be something unplanned from the beginning that he serves his corrupt billionaire friend or boss then switch back his behaviour later. If he in this state shamelessly speaks about shooting somebody for the service of that guy, what could he be willing to do for him if he becomes the President?    

57

Continuing from the preceding post

And if you wonder that the different seller name for one of the items in the link posted below could be the reason for the difference remember that I reached the other seller by clicking the "Buy it again" link supplied by Amazon itself. So why couldn't it replace the seller or offer to replace the seller in case that seller was unable to fulfill the order because of running out of the item or whatever reason. Anyway, even that is most probably not needed. That is because THIS and THIS, images, show the seller is offering that item and that Amazon itself is directly responsible for fulfillment of orders from that seller.    

56

And if you think this guy leaves me without bothering elsewhere you are wrong. Look at THIS which also shows the corruption in Amazon. The story behind it is that I ordered things yesterday and selected two days shipping speed. However, today I read an email from Amazon stating that the order will be arriving on Monday which sounded too late. So to show that it is also a harassment thing pulled by this guy I went back to my Amazon account and clicked on "buy it again" for both items then selected the two day shipping speed. You can see how the window on the left states that the older order will be delivered on Monday while the smaller one (I had to make it smaller in order to show the "Shipping Speed" selected on the other one) showing the order I am in the process of making, on the right, states that the delivery is "guaranteed" to be on Friday 4/22/2016 for exactly the same items. That is of course before the order gets customized  for me for harassment purposes. 

55

The invasion to my privacy over the Internet is always on and in real time and the FBI is not stopping it let alone prosecuting it despite knowing clearly that I am not lying here. Actually, because of the continuity of the action, the word "invasion" can hardly be less expressive here. The much more closer to correctness here is to call what has been going on the occupation to my privacy.

54

continuing from post 52

I hoped that adding the crossing of physical boundary line by entering my car would leave no excuse for not persecuting this guy but apparently it still couldn't bring a match for the shameless corruption here.      

53

I did not like to do this earlier because I don't like empowering changing results based on thinly focused momentous impulse reactions . But now I can more easily say that those who may think that the claim about the level of financial contributions to Sanders campaign from regular persons has even a five percent chance of being credible might be severely deluding themselves. In other words, anyone thinks that he can pass something that is hardly believable as this because of a character playing may need to think again and again. I have seen more than enough of psychotic deceptions that stands on nothing except showing a character that doesn't seem to fit the accusations in my life for me to feel easy about such a thing.  

52

If interruption is not enough, even without the yellow dots I showed HERE , yesterday he suddenly cut something to which I was listening in the middle of it and replaced it with something else of his choice. 

51

The guy wanted to continue playing so he disabled my access to that website again. This time I brought my kitchen Chrome Book and was able to access it on that computer. It is probably not hard for the ISP to distinguish between computers enough to do that. In fact I am not sure that my cell phone did not use the home wifi to access that site when I used it and that is why I concentrated on the different devices and avoided using the different network explanation in the preceding post. Anyway, this time I decided to catch the thing on video. The first video HERE shows me unable to access the site from the computer I usually use then able to do that from the other one (although I failed to manage to use the same portal). Then he returned the capability to access the site to my main laptop so I used that opportunity to intentionally enter a wrong password and show how that leads to a different response in case one thinks that the difference in the first video was the result of entering different passwords and that was recorded in the second video.    

50

While THIS picture, from post 47,  shows my inability to access that website from my computer, THESE two pictures shows me accessing that same site at a very close time on my cell phone. Although just the site address in the first picture above could by itself suggest very high probability that it was faked and the ISP provider for my computer (Charter) diverted me to it.  

49

Back to the things that more probably constitute a tort or a contract infringement even if the other party allows this guy to do them, do you know how it feels having this guy may take away your capability to login to an account of yours at anytime?

It is not just online where he does such malicious actions. I mentioned before how he did the same thing with my attempt to access my bank help over the phone to recover access to my account online (I don't remember how much of the problem I was having online was of his making to begin with). Every time I dial the number of my bank I get "Goodbye" and the call ends. After a week or so, I went to a branch of that bank trying to recover my access online. Although I did not expect them to tell me that they themselves have to dial that same number, I was much more surprised when they dialed that number and everything worked normally without that "Goodbye" and ending the call. I went back home and tried to access that same number again but this time using my cell phone instead of my landline phone and was able to do the same. I told the person there about what I have been experiencing with my calls but what are the chances that he could have believed such a story resulting from this guy having fun and enjoying himself by infringing on my rights like this?

48

continuing from the preceding post

And if you want to include things that may not involve infringing on a contractual right of mine, take a look at THIS. This is something I wanted to watch on YouTube and the yellow dots are interruptions he put for me. In case you wonder why those dots do not continue at the same level with the rest of the movie you need to know about my habit of dividing a movie in two halves instead of watching it all in one sitting. He may also pause what I am playing or interrupt it even despite the absence of such dots.

47

As if the continuous invasion to my privacy is not enough, the guy may disrupt and cause malicious actions whenever he wants. In just this week I had an application over the Internet that was taken different than the way I submitted it.  Second, yesterday I was, for no reason, logged out of my chrome book. Not only that, but my choice for not to be asked for a pass code on that computer was also cancelled. And just a while ago I tried to log in to my mortgage account and received  THIS . To be sure that was something faked by this guy I tried to access the same website using my cell phone and was able to do that without a problem (of course access though the cell phone could have been faked too).