92

Back to the issue of my privacy, I just want to ask one simple question. It is like a public knowledge, and has been so for years, that this corruption guy know every thing I do over the internet. My question is: How does every body, especially those in the law enforcement and the top of the executive branch, think the guy obtains the information they hear? How could anyone honestly say there isn't at least an amount of suspicion sufficient to cause going after what this guy has been doing here to see the legality of it? Why is it accepted publicly accepted like this that my privacy can be continuously invaded by this guy like I do not exist?

91

As shown HERE, I started with claims "about the alleged death of Justice Scalia and/or how the court is equally divided on my case". Then in post 297 I expanded that to "all claims about all levels of inclination" before expanding that again to include "any claim about the judges of the court". 

90

Instead of the encroachment on others playing those Terrorism allegation games, I gave the guy the opportunity to make direct false claims about what the judges of the court are going to do to my case by waiving any right I may have against the falsehood of those claims.

Remember, I said that everybody, including the judges themselves, can make any claim, false or true, about the judges or what they are going to do to my case without affecting my rights because of making those claims (subject to the limitation I stated HERE). In other words, while how the case will be resolved count, for my part, any allegation about that does not. 

So, if he wants to scare me off, it is hard to think of a better or more empowering tool to give him than this which I gave since March.  

   

89

As much as this corruption guy thinks he is defying the reason for my case in the big picture by involving the rest of the government to this level as much as he could be supplementing it.  

88

Actually, even that talk should be needed for somebody who at least from the outside acts acceptably. Here, with an FBI director and his subordinates themselves lying about the occurrence of crimes, it is mind boggling to see them still in their positions even before you dig any deeper.

And your congress seems cool with all that , if not themselves participating in that lying, as if approving James Comey at the senate by , as I remember, 98 percent, or something like that was not enough guilt or degrading thing on their part to begin with.

I, on the other hand, questioned that guy taking this position from the beginning and you did not need to wait long to see him behaving in this corrupt manner. Had any director acted like this before? 

He started with the Sony cyber attack fabrication and I questioned that before he proves me right once again about him and move to make clear fabrications like the ones we currently have. 

By the way, apparently the guy was approved and set to stay until 2023 for us to enjoy his corruption.

87

Until I have privacy and lines this guy cant cross I don't feel I really exist. I demand freedom from this new form of slavery. I demand a law enforcement that could prosecute this guy for invading my privacy even if I myself did not know he did, let alone when it is clear that he is not just invading but more like confiscating it. I demand a law enforcement that causes worrying that an invalid cooperation with this guy could be discovered, instead of counting on his backing to do the most outrageous things publicly.

This law enforcement is a sinkhole of corruption that wouldn't care if you bring evidences against this guy that would hit them on the face let alone having them to honestly back you were you yourself don't know you were violated.  

86

As if I did not already have enough to ask this question. All this public conspiring and lying by government officials, is this a real government? How is it that such situation is even remotely tolerable? How can anyone trust someone who shamelessly fabricate things and lie like this in anything, let alone running the country? If they do these things publicly for the service of the corruption guy, do you think they really apply the rules on him like everybody else where nobody can see anything? Just one of those stories they keep fabricating is enough to drag to the lowest scale in moral values and integrity, let alone the legal consequences.  Just one of those stories is enough to make you ask: Is this really a president? Is that really an FBI director? Is this really a government running a country? 

Don't get me wrong. When it comes to affecting me with these games they are light years away from doing that.The corruption guy has been making those "officials" degrade the system and themselves for nothing. But how about the effect on other people?

They are fabricating Terrorism attacks! How is it even remotely acceptable to allege such false things on the group to which the attackers supposedly belong? And how about those who really had suffered such attacks? I was hoping that they, especially with all the showing of care and concern about Terrorism here, would at least respect the real victims of such events enough not to cause confusing real suffering with fake. Unfortunately, I was in another world and nothing is too sacred for the corruption guy and his boss to trample and make a joke of it. And all this is not even because of a question of survival or even remotely close to that for them.

85

How beautiful is that? The corruption guy presses one button and he makes my brief delivered to an appellate court at 10:30 in the night. He presses another one and the mail carrier denies me a basic service refusing to pick up my package, on a day that was specially designated for those packages, for no reason and leave it out there in front of every body (By the way, I don't even send any mail through my mailbox. Instead I drop my mail in street mail boxes).

Speaking about denying basic service, this guy may think I did not know that the period my area stayed without electricity during the time of the so called polar cortex was a thing intentionally created as service to him.  

      

84

continuing from post 77

As if the privilege given to him on my privacy with the various other crossing of lines and games he is allowed to play on me is not enough, he emboldens others on me and makes them deny me service directly for no reason. Then, because they are backed by him, if I complain nothing happen to them  even in a federal government entity like the postal service . 

83

I hope that supporters of Trump and Sanders will not one day go to a puppet show and think the dummies they see move on their own.

82

continuing from the preceding post

In addition to the timing, I wonder if Sanders's rival was like one or two superdelegates away from the number for nomination or was it that a big chunk of superdelegates suddenly came to its side and nobody questioned that it stopped exactly at the number required for nomination, not even one superdelegate more than what is needed?

81

News are being spread by the media that Sanders's rival had obtained the required delegate count for nomination. A simple google search showed that she still doesn't have the required number in voting based delegates. But they counted in pledges from superdelegates. So one purpose could be to tell her voters that their votes are not needed so her rival can as much as possible exchanges the superdelegates who supposedly went to her with voting based delegates he gets in the election then if he exceeds her voting based delegate count he could claim that he is the legitimate winner.  

80

It is ridiculous how much the absence of prosecution because of the corruption makes others do what this guy wants without fear of consequences.

79

continuing from post 77
How often have such a thing happened? I was denied service, and publicly so, by a federal government official and it went like OK.  

78

It has always sounded to me as if the situation with Edward Snowden was created by somebody who was trying to threaten the government in response to its reaction toward what I sent the senate about my case with the courts. Then before I carry out what I intended to write regarding how the creation of the Sanders hype was the other side to the same Snowden coin, the strength of that view became doubled with the change in Sanders behaviour to a threatening one after facing how his wining in voting based delegates is a remote probability.

Trump, Sanders and Snowden all belong to the same entity but they just use different styles for their service to it.