This is beyond ridiculous. I have contract with Charter but they continue to intentionally take away my internet service whenever they want. One person has been intentionally specifically targeted by Charter with taking his internet access. How is such a thing not worthy of government enforcement and prosecution? It is clear that neither of the two safety catchers ("as is" and "as available") mentioned in the contract with Charter covers taking away service targeting only one person like what is happening to me.
What happens if it becomes the general view to companies that they can announce readiness to provide service to the public but still may choose specific persons to play on and violate their contract with? Is not that defrauding to the public in general? If some special exception is being given here then I repeater again that I do not accept or tolerate a bit having my rights disregarded and violated like this.
