A government watching and tolerating like this government is watching this guy having all the freedom he currently has over my Internet privacy is placing itself at the disgusting level of how a government should be. And no, having some celebrities complaining about how their accounts were hacked and the like does not balance things out by giving the excuse of widespread problem regardless of whether one thinks it was intended for that purpose or not. Nothing is like what has been happening here, and for years, with this guy's government granted privilege over my privacy.        

And these hacking stories from Target and the like to celebrities to North Korea with Sony and China with insurance companies or whatever and even some similar things attributed to ISIS were caused by him playing around and trying to distract others from his sever invading to my privacy and, at least with Sony's story, partly trying to show me his control and how much corrupted cooperation he can pull. 

What strengthened more my confidence in that or at least made me less hesitant to emphasize such view despite its megalomaniac look is the ease with which I saw him pull all the level of corruption I saw him create publicly in the past few months. 

Actually, with little attention to the history sequence of those hacking claims one can see how the claims were increasing in intensity as if somebody crossing one line after another while watching out for the reactions.  

This is not a government. This is an extremely dirty swamp of corruption we are trapped in and no body cares. Aside from other things, look at how long it has been like a public knowledge to them that this corruption guy is a permanent invader to my privacy over the Internet watching every thing I do and they are OK with it. 

I wonder how much the sinking to this level in morality and dignity with all this media fabricated stories and public conspiracy is enjoyable because it doesn't seem to serve any material purpose and much less the one it might have been intended for. However, and I repeat this again, in order not to make this abyss a bottomless one, at least a line should be drawn when it comes to such actions coming from the cops and the FBI or other entities trusted in applying and enforcing the law. 

  

I mentioned the time and the network in the previous post in order to help identify which episode of that show I was referring. The time is Eastern Time and the location, just in case that network programs can differ by location, is east Tennessee. 

At 12:30 am today I watched one of those Forensic Files shows aired on the Escape TV network. That show was about the killing of a girl, who was arrested for use of drugs, by her boyfriend when she was about to tell on him, according to the show in exchange for making a deal on her drug charges, for involvement in committing a murder in a black neighborhood, the thing that fits with him being accused as a white supremacist. The show was about how the advance analysis of tiny evidence from a refrigerator belonging to the boyfriend in which the body of that girl was kept for some time helped in convicting him as being the killer and how the police chief kept that refrigerator all that time despite providing no evidencing benefit.

After watching the show I suddenly noticed how it was left a big necessary question unanswered. How did the boyfriend know that the girl who was at police custody was about to tell on him for him to come pay her bail to take her home then kill her? 

Also the girl arrest for drug use in the home of the boyfriend where she was living happened when the cops came to talk with boyfriend about that murder and did not find him home. What police detectives concern themselves about the use of drugs by a person while they are in the process of investigating a homicide? On the other hand, that seems to fit with over compensating not finding the boyfriend at home as something arranged with the police. Or it could be that the girl was the real intended target of the visit by the police in order to keep her away from noticing what her boyfriend was doing by keeping her in prison for drug charges but that path fired back with her wanting to reveal what the boyfriend did . 

The show also talked about how the police chief was seen as behaving crazy or unreasonably trying to find the body of that girl which could be, together with the keeping of that refrigerator all that time, intended to compensate for less than serious investigation.The case was also resolved after the guy was already in jail and enough time had passed to disable the capability to prosecute the mother and sister of that guy, living in the same house, because of covering evidences of the killing and not reporting it.

In short, answering the main question about how the guy knew that the girl was about to tell on him negatively regarding the role of the cops in that can also find support in other things in the picture.

Was that girl betrayed to death by the cops themselves? Did the same people taking credit for prosecuting her killer knowingly conspired creating what led her to death ?

Of course this could be entirely wrong but I couldn't let that obvious question go without pointing it out despite speaking from my stage here.