92

Back to the issue of my privacy, I just want to ask one simple question. It is like a public knowledge, and has been so for years, that this corruption guy know every thing I do over the internet. My question is: How does every body, especially those in the law enforcement and the top of the executive branch, think the guy obtains the information they hear? How could anyone honestly say there isn't at least an amount of suspicion sufficient to cause going after what this guy has been doing here to see the legality of it? Why is it accepted publicly accepted like this that my privacy can be continuously invaded by this guy like I do not exist?

91

As shown HERE, I started with claims "about the alleged death of Justice Scalia and/or how the court is equally divided on my case". Then in post 297 I expanded that to "all claims about all levels of inclination" before expanding that again to include "any claim about the judges of the court". 

90

Instead of the encroachment on others playing those Terrorism allegation games, I gave the guy the opportunity to make direct false claims about what the judges of the court are going to do to my case by waiving any right I may have against the falsehood of those claims.

Remember, I said that everybody, including the judges themselves, can make any claim, false or true, about the judges or what they are going to do to my case without affecting my rights because of making those claims (subject to the limitation I stated HERE). In other words, while how the case will be resolved count, for my part, any allegation about that does not. 

So, if he wants to scare me off, it is hard to think of a better or more empowering tool to give him than this which I gave since March.  

   

89

As much as this corruption guy thinks he is defying the reason for my case in the big picture by involving the rest of the government to this level as much as he could be supplementing it.  

88

Actually, even that talk should be needed for somebody who at least from the outside acts acceptably. Here, with an FBI director and his subordinates themselves lying about the occurrence of crimes, it is mind boggling to see them still in their positions even before you dig any deeper.

And your congress seems cool with all that , if not themselves participating in that lying, as if approving James Comey at the senate by , as I remember, 98 percent, or something like that was not enough guilt or degrading thing on their part to begin with.

I, on the other hand, questioned that guy taking this position from the beginning and you did not need to wait long to see him behaving in this corrupt manner. Had any director acted like this before? 

He started with the Sony cyber attack fabrication and I questioned that before he proves me right once again about him and move to make clear fabrications like the ones we currently have. 

By the way, apparently the guy was approved and set to stay until 2023 for us to enjoy his corruption.

87

Until I have privacy and lines this guy cant cross I don't feel I really exist. I demand freedom from this new form of slavery. I demand a law enforcement that could prosecute this guy for invading my privacy even if I myself did not know he did, let alone when it is clear that he is not just invading but more like confiscating it. I demand a law enforcement that causes worrying that an invalid cooperation with this guy could be discovered, instead of counting on his backing to do the most outrageous things publicly.

This law enforcement is a sinkhole of corruption that wouldn't care if you bring evidences against this guy that would hit them on the face let alone having them to honestly back you were you yourself don't know you were violated.  

86

As if I did not already have enough to ask this question. All this public conspiring and lying by government officials, is this a real government? How is it that such situation is even remotely tolerable? How can anyone trust someone who shamelessly fabricate things and lie like this in anything, let alone running the country? If they do these things publicly for the service of the corruption guy, do you think they really apply the rules on him like everybody else where nobody can see anything? Just one of those stories they keep fabricating is enough to drag to the lowest scale in moral values and integrity, let alone the legal consequences.  Just one of those stories is enough to make you ask: Is this really a president? Is that really an FBI director? Is this really a government running a country? 

Don't get me wrong. When it comes to affecting me with these games they are light years away from doing that.The corruption guy has been making those "officials" degrade the system and themselves for nothing. But how about the effect on other people?

They are fabricating Terrorism attacks! How is it even remotely acceptable to allege such false things on the group to which the attackers supposedly belong? And how about those who really had suffered such attacks? I was hoping that they, especially with all the showing of care and concern about Terrorism here, would at least respect the real victims of such events enough not to cause confusing real suffering with fake. Unfortunately, I was in another world and nothing is too sacred for the corruption guy and his boss to trample and make a joke of it. And all this is not even because of a question of survival or even remotely close to that for them.

85

How beautiful is that? The corruption guy presses one button and he makes my brief delivered to an appellate court at 10:30 in the night. He presses another one and the mail carrier denies me a basic service refusing to pick up my package, on a day that was specially designated for those packages, for no reason and leave it out there in front of every body (By the way, I don't even send any mail through my mailbox. Instead I drop my mail in street mail boxes).

Speaking about denying basic service, this guy may think I did not know that the period my area stayed without electricity during the time of the so called polar cortex was a thing intentionally created as service to him.  

      

84

continuing from post 77

As if the privilege given to him on my privacy with the various other crossing of lines and games he is allowed to play on me is not enough, he emboldens others on me and makes them deny me service directly for no reason. Then, because they are backed by him, if I complain nothing happen to them  even in a federal government entity like the postal service . 

83

I hope that supporters of Trump and Sanders will not one day go to a puppet show and think the dummies they see move on their own.

82

continuing from the preceding post

In addition to the timing, I wonder if Sanders's rival was like one or two superdelegates away from the number for nomination or was it that a big chunk of superdelegates suddenly came to its side and nobody questioned that it stopped exactly at the number required for nomination, not even one superdelegate more than what is needed?

81

News are being spread by the media that Sanders's rival had obtained the required delegate count for nomination. A simple google search showed that she still doesn't have the required number in voting based delegates. But they counted in pledges from superdelegates. So one purpose could be to tell her voters that their votes are not needed so her rival can as much as possible exchanges the superdelegates who supposedly went to her with voting based delegates he gets in the election then if he exceeds her voting based delegate count he could claim that he is the legitimate winner.  

80

It is ridiculous how much the absence of prosecution because of the corruption makes others do what this guy wants without fear of consequences.

79

continuing from post 77
How often have such a thing happened? I was denied service, and publicly so, by a federal government official and it went like OK.  

78

It has always sounded to me as if the situation with Edward Snowden was created by somebody who was trying to threaten the government in response to its reaction toward what I sent the senate about my case with the courts. Then before I carry out what I intended to write regarding how the creation of the Sanders hype was the other side to the same Snowden coin, the strength of that view became doubled with the change in Sanders behaviour to a threatening one after facing how his wining in voting based delegates is a remote probability.

Trump, Sanders and Snowden all belong to the same entity but they just use different styles for their service to it.

77

I submitted a complaint to the postal service regarding what I mentioned in POST 61. What was their reaction? Nothing except for requesting in their emails to communicate through the phone despite not explaining why that medium is needed or stating anything that could suggest such use would make a difference.

It sounded more like following the advice of this corruption guy to replay that trick when they sent me what sounded like a childish request for my phone number again after I told them that they can tell me whatever they want on email. I also pointed out that I myself haven't done anything to speak about except being selected by the mail carrier to be refused the service.

I had the food stayed on top of my mail box until I brought it back home after 8 pm on that day, in a bag they themselves delivered to me for that purpose, and they think it would go like that?   

By the way, the selection of the communication or response medium was in the complaint itself and I selected Email.

76

As an example of how corruption could find its way, I once checked on one of those judges who behaved badly in my case and found that judge was recommended to the president for nomination by a veteran who lost most of his limbs in battles. So if recognizing Sanders is difficult for you then good luck with the like of that.

Actually, at the level of making and insisting on claims like those which came from Sanders regarding funding his campaign, failing to figure out someone feels like lowering for the world itself. Those were not slips of tongue or occasional misbehaviour. Those were part of a position intentionally and continuously maintained. You could hardly get a clearer sign in life.  

75

Another sample of how I live far from a free freeman should be let to live, yesterday I experienced what was very probably, as usual, the work of the corruption guy in cutting me from the internet service until he decided to connect me back.  

74

Sorry boss of the corruption guy, your overestimation for the power it had in making that very doubtful claim probably cost you a corruption sleeper cell you have been keeping clean and away from suspicion for years. However, I personally did not really need that and already internally found it hard to give your guy more than the lowest score in morality based merely on his talking.

73

Even that grievance for Sanders made on the NBC's Saturday Night show was a fraudulent one. His rival did not get a single voting based delegate, where Sanders is still trailing her, more than she earned in that state. The allegation counted in superdelegates, who are neither based on voting nor bound to any commitment they make. 
It just doesn't feel good letting someone pass with a fraudulent grievance in front of everybody.  

72

If Sanders become the democratic nominee we could all enjoy watching a good pillow fight with Trump to decide  the presidency.  

71

continuing from post 68

Despite calling this President as corrupt, one may need to be careful not to confuse those who choose to act corruptly in some specific things from those who are more like agents or extensions to the corruption guy (including his boss of course).

70

Searching for a president? Those in the government who resisted and were not taken by the corruption guy should get credit for that. Tests like what happened in my case should not be ignored. 

69

I repeat again, I refuse to exist having no boundary against this guy. This is nothing more than a new form of slavery. The invasion to my privacy is a public knowledge and nobody cares. Does it look like to anyone that the FBI is holding this corruption guy accountable for his actions anywhere like the ordinary person? They are not even stopping him from continuing his actions let alone holding him responsible for what he did. Is it any wonder all the arbitration clauses you see? Because for the like of this guy it is known that if you just pass the civil entity itself you get the whole field open for you with hardly any questioning to what you do.   

68

Does that guy realize how desperate his use of the word "crooked" against that other candidate looks like?
Speaking about corrupt liars, even though this President will go, are we supposed to continue with this FBI director?

67

I just want to ask supporters of Sanders this. Do you believe that he has been funding his campaign through the small donations from ordinary people as he alleged? If you don't then think what does that imply on the charachter of the person who falsely alleges such thing for himself and receives the advantage it gives him over his rivals? How about when he himself brings that contrast to mind when he uses pointing out things like the paid speeches against another candidate? How could such a fraudulent behaviour passes as OK thing?

Although thinking otherwise sounds like a joke, remember suspicion in things like these may not need to reach the level of certainty required to make judgment on the person because that is not the main objective when trying to make the best choice.

Six years ago, in reaction to what this corruption guy was doing, I talked about those whom I called deceptive psychotics (although there is much redundancy in that than meets the eye) and how much they depend on character deception and the magnitude of how convincing their character assumption. Even if I were to bring an example for that it would have been more like something the reader would look at externally. This situation on the other hand makes people live seeing how a character could be convincing to make some ignore the facts to this level. However, one may need to be careful that he still may not have seen much of this kind of convincing yet.  

66

If you wonder what to make of that Trump's telephone call story it is not hard to see it in light of his previous activities serving the corruption guy here. Most probably it was him who revealed that tape intentionally trying to claim fraudulent activity on himself to defend Sanders. He is acting as if he thinks he is so immune that instead of being affected by something like this the view to the thing itself and its kind would become less bad. He is probably lying in denying himself intentionally trying to make things worse.

Much of the character issue implied in the story of the tape itself depends on the kind of relationship he had with the other side but this adds other dimension to it regardless .

His contradiction to himself about seeking funds to support his campaign is probably at least partly for the same purpose.

Also, the story about Sanders supporters and their reaction in a democratic party event and  the death threats they supposedly sent seems to show intentional creation of something at least partly to suggest violent nature in his supporters to counter the claim that Trumps accusation to them was intended to help cover the connection between him and Sanders.

65

continuing from the post below

Also with the level of corruption he has been pulling in order to deal with the consequences of his earlier corruption, one cannot escape the question of aiming to defeat the purpose. It fits with what I talked about elsewhere that with characters of this type you may never know who is the real target.

64

Do you see through all the fighting he has been doing how the corruption guy cares for what affect him here compared to how easily and carelessly he pulls his corruption and degrades the system?

63

continuing from the preceding post

And if what Trump said there was another service from him for the corruption guy and his boss, like other things he has been doing, it is an easier path for showing his corruption.

62

I don't know if I paid attention to it earlier, but watching Trump speaks about how another person was bought by Goldman Sachs made me feel somewhat baffled about the level of double standard that guy is allowed to get away with. Somebody takes a loan and therefore becomes owned because of that while he still should be considered a free man despite a show given to him where he for years appeared sitting like a king with aids on both of his sides and fire from among those sitting awaiting his judgment, not to mention his business connections and affiliations especially in the most suspicious land for corruption, New York. Even the pretending of NBC to sever connection with him did not last a modest amount of time. He could be seeing himself as an unquestionable fact of life, but it maybe unavoidable to the ordinary person to wonder about why this guy has been given all that media support as if he is the only billionaire in the country. If it is a question of money, do an internet search and see if you can find this guy listed even within the top 30 richest people in this country. Yet he is the one appearing like the one and only.        

61

Although it may not reach the level of interfering with the work of a court, this new mail thing this corruption guy had pulled recently also makes one wonder about the level of corruption that makes people put following him above the law and their duties that easily. You know those plastic bags with mail permit number where you can put none perishable food then leave them outside to be picked and delivered by the mail. I received one of them in the mail so I went out and bought a number of instances for two items to fill the bag with for the specified date. It clearly was not something unnoticeable to the corruption guy who could have at least known that from my credit card transactions. So what could he have done to that? The mail carrier for no reason made me the special exception to her duty on that date. She refused to pickup the bag and did that in front of my surveillance cameras. She did not even deliver mail or come close to mail boxes on my house side of the road on that date. Instead she chose to drive forward then back on the side away from my mail box on the road.        

60

I wonder if it was noticed how the news about the FBI catching someone with intention to attack a synagogue was timed close to the Indiana democrat's Primary election. It suggests an attempt to help Sanders using his Jewish identity. 

I actually wanted to say the same about the news of that bus thing that seemed artificially made and stunt like as in a movie, in Israel which was timed for the earlier primary before this one added support for the same thing.

According to the news itself, the arrest happened as a result of having the offer made by the undercover FBI agent to the guy to make that attack accepted instead of the later initiating things himself. That shows an admission from the FBI about how much the choice of time came from it. What also adds to the question of timing having that entity says the public was never in danger.

Also, the connection to Israel mentioned above was itself preceded by other connections related to which I also wanted to mention earlier how they show the Israeli Prime Minister working for the boss of the corruption guy here to the level of executing a policy for that purpose that led to blood shed from both sides there. And by the way, I doubt that Trump's talk about closing mosques here was just something he took from the news instead of him being in the depth about what was going on and how things were pulled from here to happen there.

With or without that Trump thing, the things can easily fit to connect for the corruption guy and his boss and how for his service Jewish related things are being used.

So how much there is a probability that all those are just volunteering their help to Sanders and he is not part of the group?Even if we add to that his claim of how much his campaign runs on funding from regular people?

Yet he is the one who kept throwing stones on that other democratic candidate for taking money to do speeches.

I think that some may falsely believe that they can corruptly define corruption and control seeing it.

And of course, adding Trump to the picture helps to support the picture even more with things like what I mentioned in earlier posts and Trump's claim that those who were disturbing his gatherings were Sander's supporters later.

Anyway, if there was made an exception about the corruption of the FBI with things related to me and my situation with this corruption guy, here is some external material suggesting it trying to manipulate the public for that same guy and his boss.  

   

       

59

Imagine always living with this guy here may anytime enjoy exerting a power over you or controlling you by interfering with your things. Yesterday, for example, he apparently decided to stop my Bank of America credit card twice. And while this one happened at home, he used to do this same disturbing thing while I am in a distant city (Speaking about Bank of America it appears that they also abandoned Emails and any similar message sending thing for this guy who pushed for this behaviour after his story here).

You cant go anywhere without his connections following you. At the beginning of this month I had a dentist appointment and dreamed that he would not contact that dentist and mess up my things. Unfortunately, it was just that, a dream. The Hygienist appeared less interested in doing her job after not succeeding with something else related to this guy and now I have to wait for a good cleaning session because this was counted as one.     

58

So that guy now decides to stop the joke and start acting "presidential"? Did anyone tell him that we wanted to play games with him and that it should end whenever he wants it to end? Even worse it can hardly seems to be something unplanned from the beginning that he serves his corrupt billionaire friend or boss then switch back his behaviour later. If he in this state shamelessly speaks about shooting somebody for the service of that guy, what could he be willing to do for him if he becomes the President?    

57

Continuing from the preceding post

And if you wonder that the different seller name for one of the items in the link posted below could be the reason for the difference remember that I reached the other seller by clicking the "Buy it again" link supplied by Amazon itself. So why couldn't it replace the seller or offer to replace the seller in case that seller was unable to fulfill the order because of running out of the item or whatever reason. Anyway, even that is most probably not needed. That is because THIS and THIS, images, show the seller is offering that item and that Amazon itself is directly responsible for fulfillment of orders from that seller.    

56

And if you think this guy leaves me without bothering elsewhere you are wrong. Look at THIS which also shows the corruption in Amazon. The story behind it is that I ordered things yesterday and selected two days shipping speed. However, today I read an email from Amazon stating that the order will be arriving on Monday which sounded too late. So to show that it is also a harassment thing pulled by this guy I went back to my Amazon account and clicked on "buy it again" for both items then selected the two day shipping speed. You can see how the window on the left states that the older order will be delivered on Monday while the smaller one (I had to make it smaller in order to show the "Shipping Speed" selected on the other one) showing the order I am in the process of making, on the right, states that the delivery is "guaranteed" to be on Friday 4/22/2016 for exactly the same items. That is of course before the order gets customized  for me for harassment purposes. 

55

The invasion to my privacy over the Internet is always on and in real time and the FBI is not stopping it let alone prosecuting it despite knowing clearly that I am not lying here. Actually, because of the continuity of the action, the word "invasion" can hardly be less expressive here. The much more closer to correctness here is to call what has been going on the occupation to my privacy.

54

continuing from post 52

I hoped that adding the crossing of physical boundary line by entering my car would leave no excuse for not persecuting this guy but apparently it still couldn't bring a match for the shameless corruption here.      

53

I did not like to do this earlier because I don't like empowering changing results based on thinly focused momentous impulse reactions . But now I can more easily say that those who may think that the claim about the level of financial contributions to Sanders campaign from regular persons has even a five percent chance of being credible might be severely deluding themselves. In other words, anyone thinks that he can pass something that is hardly believable as this because of a character playing may need to think again and again. I have seen more than enough of psychotic deceptions that stands on nothing except showing a character that doesn't seem to fit the accusations in my life for me to feel easy about such a thing.  

52

If interruption is not enough, even without the yellow dots I showed HERE , yesterday he suddenly cut something to which I was listening in the middle of it and replaced it with something else of his choice. 

51

The guy wanted to continue playing so he disabled my access to that website again. This time I brought my kitchen Chrome Book and was able to access it on that computer. It is probably not hard for the ISP to distinguish between computers enough to do that. In fact I am not sure that my cell phone did not use the home wifi to access that site when I used it and that is why I concentrated on the different devices and avoided using the different network explanation in the preceding post. Anyway, this time I decided to catch the thing on video. The first video HERE shows me unable to access the site from the computer I usually use then able to do that from the other one (although I failed to manage to use the same portal). Then he returned the capability to access the site to my main laptop so I used that opportunity to intentionally enter a wrong password and show how that leads to a different response in case one thinks that the difference in the first video was the result of entering different passwords and that was recorded in the second video.    

50

While THIS picture, from post 47,  shows my inability to access that website from my computer, THESE two pictures shows me accessing that same site at a very close time on my cell phone. Although just the site address in the first picture above could by itself suggest very high probability that it was faked and the ISP provider for my computer (Charter) diverted me to it.  

49

Back to the things that more probably constitute a tort or a contract infringement even if the other party allows this guy to do them, do you know how it feels having this guy may take away your capability to login to an account of yours at anytime?

It is not just online where he does such malicious actions. I mentioned before how he did the same thing with my attempt to access my bank help over the phone to recover access to my account online (I don't remember how much of the problem I was having online was of his making to begin with). Every time I dial the number of my bank I get "Goodbye" and the call ends. After a week or so, I went to a branch of that bank trying to recover my access online. Although I did not expect them to tell me that they themselves have to dial that same number, I was much more surprised when they dialed that number and everything worked normally without that "Goodbye" and ending the call. I went back home and tried to access that same number again but this time using my cell phone instead of my landline phone and was able to do the same. I told the person there about what I have been experiencing with my calls but what are the chances that he could have believed such a story resulting from this guy having fun and enjoying himself by infringing on my rights like this?

48

continuing from the preceding post

And if you want to include things that may not involve infringing on a contractual right of mine, take a look at THIS. This is something I wanted to watch on YouTube and the yellow dots are interruptions he put for me. In case you wonder why those dots do not continue at the same level with the rest of the movie you need to know about my habit of dividing a movie in two halves instead of watching it all in one sitting. He may also pause what I am playing or interrupt it even despite the absence of such dots.

47

As if the continuous invasion to my privacy is not enough, the guy may disrupt and cause malicious actions whenever he wants. In just this week I had an application over the Internet that was taken different than the way I submitted it.  Second, yesterday I was, for no reason, logged out of my chrome book. Not only that, but my choice for not to be asked for a pass code on that computer was also cancelled. And just a while ago I tried to log in to my mortgage account and received  THIS . To be sure that was something faked by this guy I tried to access the same website using my cell phone and was able to do that without a problem (of course access though the cell phone could have been faked too).   

46

The level of confiscation to my privacy by this guy seems to leave only things like a brain installed chip that can read thoughts and emotions as a room for improvement.   
I actually only relatively lately realized, through his knowledge of things about me, how much further this could have been the situation before I discovered it. That seems to take us back to  the story of Viking Systems Stock in 2010. 

45

I don't know if when a corporation speaks about itself in the privacy agreement whether itself could extend to include some shareholders and they are not considered third parties. I am trying to see if there is a legal issue preventing going after this guy for invading my privacy in everything I do over the Internet or if it is just the shameless corruption.

Even things I do outside like credit card transactions or phone calls he watches or get conveyed to him in real time or very close to that. Is that all legal? Because if it is not then for it to continue like this with all my boundaries crossed like I do not exist and for this long is beyond disgusting.
  

44

Although this Trump vs. Romney shows considerable improvement on the Trump vs. Mccain, Trump vs. Kelly and Trump vs. Hillary (the going to the restroom show) previous installments in the same sequel, it was still not that hard to be seen.

By the way they say that the President grew half an inch taller. Are they counting in nose length nowadays?      

43

I think that Trump sometimes probably gets confused and try to pass what is suitable for the general conspiracy on me, elsewhere. As if it did not appear from the beginning that he  and Sanders are the Bloomberg guy guy's, he recently appeared to have done something that strongly suggests connecting him not even through that hub but directly to the other side although it is still for the sake of that hub. According to the news, he said that he will keep mentioning the Email issue every day if /when he stands directly against Hillary. Now, think about this.Why would someone point out the repetitiveness in his action like this? Instead one would imagine that a candidate would himself state that he did not notice or care and was merely focusing on the issue if he gets questioned about such repetitiveness? What strongly seems to jump to the mind as an explanation is the showing or emphasizing the value of the free pass on that issue which Sanders gave Hillary.

By the way, I would be surprised if Sanders is really getting that much donations from regular people and not the Bloomberg guy. Although, to be fair, except for his targeting connections to Goldman Sachs, up to this point I don't remember seeing him providing direct services back to that guy like Trump.    

42

Continuing from the preceding post

A note about the translation there. Although it is relatively better, it still also suffers considerably from that problem in Arabic translation I have seen so often. That problem is related to how some translate things like delivering the news, killing the artistic expression. For example, translating that someone is glued to his chair to another language as the person does not move while may deliver the same result news wise they are not the same as an art. Even with expressions that became like a term as, for example, the Egyptians saying that someone's brain is dry which was translated directly to being stubborn, that translation could be added in parenthesis while preserving the beauty of the original expression. All that is of course in addition to other things like ignoring parts that are related to culture related things and abridging of things and skipping parts. 

In addition to that, I don't know why the word "kabob" in the title of the movie was translated to "BBQ". Another thing that could even be arguably suspicious is the translation of the salutation told to the praying guy as "you may pray in the Holy Land". The word used there is an adverb about the status of being in a sacred area. It is a common salutation like word told in Egypt to the person who have just finished a prayer and I never, and can hardly assume anybody else, took the implication to refer to something other than Mecca and Medina which is completely in line with the other salutations or titles in that culture.

By the way, there is much less probability that you could find a Muslim praying in a government office there than here but adding such thing could help make the government allow the movie. Even with all the softening and diversion included there was a text at the very beginning thanking government entities for their "understanding" to the topic of the movie.         

  

41

Speaking about how governments like that wouldn't care much not to kill the innocent in order to reach the guilty, here is an Arabic Egyptian movie (they are the main producers of that there) from 1993 (according to wikipedia) that is one of the best I have ever seen. The main event is an accident that drags into a hostage situation. Anyway, in one part of the movie the minister tells the hostage takers that nobody can twist the arms of the government and those who get killed in the middle are martyrs to their families the government would issue compensations. It is surprising to me, especially being originally from Iraq, that the government even had stopped to negotiate to begin with but the maker of the movie had to work within the limit of the freedom of expression which was probably already more than risky enough.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWVVlAzYtPk

(Although, I don't remember how good the translation there)  

40

Couple of days ago I saw a clip of a presidency candidate mentioning that there were no "terrorists" during Saddam's ruling on Iraq. Although, like I said before, things could have been done much better there, no body can compare that with the ease with which Saddam did his things. You know why? Because it is not a big problem to him to kill the innocent in order to reach the guilty.

However, if that speaker wants to learn lessons from Saddam, here is one that does not involve stepping on the innocent. Power there was in the hands of the government and corruption happen through external entities aligning themselves with the government not the other way around. You know what Saddam could have done to a post office man who miss delivers a court document obeying this guy in defiance to the government like what happened with my appellate brief?           

39

Before talking about increasing taxes, why is it that there is no talk about honest scrutiny on how really guys like this are paying theirs? After all what this guy was able to pull, how much confidence remain in him paying his taxes like the ordinary person?

Why make one rich person pay 50 percent while the other may not be even paying 20 percent?

The suspicion extends to further than validly taking advantage of loopholes in the system. That is a problem with the tax code. No, I am thinking about violations of tax code that are allowed to pass because of corruption especially favoritism. How much of what this guy had done to me was some kind of artful manipulation of the law? Hardly any. Almost all of what he did were the kind of in your face things.      

38

Although it hasn't been even two weeks since I talked in POST 30 about how this guy seems to have connection and can pull things in the IRS, yesterday I received a certified letter from that agency informing me that my installment agreement with them will be terminated and that the total amount is due immediately. The reason was supposedly that they "did not receive one or more payments from (me) as agreed to in (my) installment agreement".

I did not miss any payment. The only thing I did was that my usual payment on the 28th day of the month was late for January. I don't know when it was received but my bank record still lists it cashed on the 5th of February.

Moreover there was a reason for even this one time late (not missing) payment. I still have the envelop for the monthly payment stub letter showing a post mark date as late as the 25th of January for a payment expected to be received on the 28th. Actually it was the receiving of that letter after I used priority mail to catch the due date of the earlier payment (the stub time was as usual on  that one. It was just that I forgot to send it early enough for regular mail) is what suggested a game being played and made me write the post I mentioned above in anticipation of this.    

  
  

37

continuing from POST # 31

And here is some refreshing for the memory for the stories I mentioned in POST # 26.

HERE is the story of the transfer request and the conspiracy with the brokerage firms. 

And HERE  is what I posted about the communication from the SEC part for the service of this guy in the VKNG story (LINK1, LINK2).

36

To the best of my judgment, this guy here, including his group, is a competitors or rival to Goldman Sachs. He may not like that entity because it is closer than him to the top of the food chain in the market. So one should be careful before allowing him to concentrate attention on that entity away from himself and hit two birds in one stone.

All the corrupt control and manipulation in the market, media, courts and the government I saw that made them like a joke came from him not Goldman Sachs.     

35

continuing from post 34

I could have filed a hundred cases and in all of them the courts act like they did with my cases here and it still may not come anywhere close to make me mistake what could be the correct stand for me to take if I were someone who was thinking about investing with Madoff and knew that he had passed SEC investigation ounce or twice. That is because refusing to believe the results of what depends on checking such direct and basic stock trading things is probably as close as it could gets to refusing a direct witness.  

As you can see the thing seems to be extremely far from just not performing a good job and the SEC intentionally acting passively or actively in support of Madoff is very hard to avoid. However, it seems it was agreed that if he get caught then he is on his own and he had kept his word.

Although I read before that the courts dismisses cases suing the SEC on the Madoff's fraud, I haven't not yet found that any one of those cases was taken to the final point on that path and was denied.

Showing the SEC's failed investigation excuse because of alleged Madoff's manipulating behaviour was not the first time I see desperate attempts to find excuses for that agency even in movies. In the Wolf of Wall Street the fraud guy supposedly made SEC investigation on him fail because he turned the cooling in the room too high. Also as much as these defending claims for the SEC came from the scamming guys themselves as much as it adds support to having the SEC as a partner.   

34

I don't know why all this fight against admitting the corruption of the SEC. Yesterday I watched even the guy who pointed out Madoff's fraud try to limit his argument against that agency to being inept. He says that they are not intelligent enough to be corrupt. Why such a week and desperate looking defence?

First, corruption is far from being reserved to especially intelligent people. Second, even assuming so, the one here does not require more that turning the head away from seeing the facts. 

What kind of scheme did Madoff defraud people with? Was it something like fabricating sale numbers of a product so one would think that it requires more from the SEC to go and check?

No he was fabricating stock trades and positions. That is the core and the most basic of what the SEC should watch for. A scam of that kind at that magnitude and for that long was passed and despite how the guy here says that it takes five minutes to suspect or discover a scam by looking at the numbers. Moreover the guy himself also mentioned four or more times writing to that entity about the issue.

If that was not enough, and to blur the line between passive and active support even more, that entity supposedly investigated the scam once or twice and did not find anything wrong. Even if you had a big doubt , if you hear that it was investigated and nothing bad turned out you probably say I must be wrong then and invest your money there if you were already contemplating that. Imagine if you where to still suggest there could be a scam there what level of paranoia could have been ascribed to you. It is like the cops investigating whether a car was registered and fail to find that it was not despite having no tag number or, to take the analogy away from direct visual discovery, one that was entirely made up.

   

33

I was lucky enough yesterday to get a signal to watch the first part of the Madoff's movie. I wonder how much the world laugh on us for claiming that the SEC did not know what was going on.

By the way, the New York SEC office which the guy making the fraud allegation against Madoff was referred to but was not met is also the office that this guy made to make that conference call with me trying to know if I was the guy who did the sudden big buying in the story of Viking System Stock I mentioned.  

32

At least that guy did not need to shoot anyone to push the people in Iowa away from voting for him.

31

Speaking of that mail story, here is a refreshment for the memory:

http://ontcposts.blogspot.com/2013/10/usps-attempted-delivery-after-1030-pm.html

http://ontcposts.blogspot.com/2013/10/beyond-outrageous-and-shameful.html

http://ontcposts.blogspot.com/2013/10/what-is-astonishing-here.html

http://ontcposts.blogspot.com/2013/12/usps-response-for-1030-pm-court.html

http://ontcposts.blogspot.com/2013/12/usps-response-for-1030-pm-court_26.html

30

And you think this guy with his boss at least really pay his taxes or scrutinized for it like the ordinary person? I am far from being confident of that. If the corruption of the IRS is close to what we saw here or even a fraction of  the SEC's then there is not much to be surprised if the answer to that question was in the negative. But it is not only a matter of being part of the general environment. That is because I have been seeing things and accumulated signs suggesting having connection inside for years there. 

On a second thought, one may tell me are you serious? Even without that extreme shameful corruption that we watched being carried out publicly in the past year, the guy can make the post office man ignores the duty of the position and the whole federal government and select your papers to take to a Federal Appellate Court closed at 10:30 in the night in fulfillment of his overriding desire and you think you need to discuss this?

29

So will there be a prosecution on this guy for entering my car or should I just add it to the privileges given to him over me despite crossing a clear line like that?
Just in case some want to pretend they don't understand, of course I did not mean he doing that action himself.

28

That presidency contender was not talking about himself when he said that he can shoot somebody publicly and some would still vote for him or at least was not only talking about himself. What he was doing is sending threats on behalf of this guy here and his boss.

Like I said earlier the talker is the dummy of those guys. 

27

It seems as if this guy has crossed another line. Walking out from one shopping store yesterday I found that my little GPS monitor was not in its place. It was attached by a suction cup to the middle of the dashboard if not closer to the driver side. It was also in a position that is tilted a little bit toward the windshield. However, I found it on the passenger seat and despite how that seat was in a position pulled all the way toward the back of the car. I don't think there is a way one can see it fallen by itself to that position. That is of course is in addition to the much bigger probability for it to fall while the car is moving instead. I had it attached for several months and travelled over 300 miles highway fast and it kept in its place. 

Anyway, I attached it to the same place then drove to another store, probably not less than 2 miles away, and it remained perfectly in its place. I spent probably not more than 10 minuets there then walked out to my car to find that monitor not in its place for the second time. Although this time it was on an area that would have made more sense to fall on it but, still, only if the car was moving to counter the tilt toward the windshield.

I am always conscious to locking my car doors when I leave it. 

I attached it to the same place again then drove probably not less than 4 miles and parked in my garage and it is still perfectly in its place.  

      

26

continuing from the post below

By the way, volume manipulation is something that was mentioned directly from the thirties securities laws and prosecuting it may not even depends on a regulation from that entity. It is one that is the kind of in your face clear violation. So imagine what happens with depending on the oversight of this entity on things inside.  

Related to the case that reached the final court, aside from volume manipulation or what is in the complaint, I  also mentioned before the story about the test I wanted to do to see if I was really getting the shares I was buying from this guy. It began with what sounded like a change in his tactics making me getting the shares more easily. So I wanted to test if the brokerage firm I was concentrating my buying of the stock in my account with it was cooperating with the guy and showing me merely a fake number of shares in my ownership. While it still might not have assured things were correct, I tried to conduct a simple test consisting of transferring the shares to another brokerage firm which is generally an easy routine procedure. I tried but did not succeed with different brokerage firms. I also saw from their handling of the request and how things change from being like an automatic procedure when they initially take the request to even fabricating new rules just to avoid that transfer afterwards what made me give up on trying other firms. Things were like a joke and you can smell the conspiracy from beyond the Atlantic ocean. 

So did the executive authority take such things into its account regarding the balance with this guy before doing what it did for him?

And what about the story I mentioned before about how, instead of protecting investors this guy made the SEC contact me and even conduct a conference call with me in order to make sure if it was I who suddenly did all that buying in a stock of a company called Viking Systems? There, even before that conference took place any modest amount of hope for it not being for a corrupt purpose did not last the same day I received the invitation for it.   

25

continuing from the post below:

It is like they closed their eyes to what is happening there until they really forgot there are problems there and as a result thought of themselves as being in the weaker position instead.

I think I mentioned this sample story before. This guy plays the fake volume game freely and without much restrictions. So trying to leave that entity called the SEC with even less excuse for its corruption, I once sent them a tip or complaint about this guy fabricating a trading volume of 30 million shares in only the first hour for a penny stock that usually can hardly be seen exceeding 10 thousands shares traded throughout the whole day. Even in Bugs Bunny cartoon they wouldn't do something like that. Did those there investigate or even care? Does AlQeada investigates Terrorism?

24

Aside from the question of morality, if it was not part of satisfying a contract and doing their part, did those in the executive branch pay sufficient attention to their being in the EXECUTIVE branch before acting as if they were hostage to this guy and do the corrupted work they did? Did they really think that they do not hold the power to go with prosecuting this guy despite of all what he does especially with the market related activities? And why go far? What about criminal prosecution based on the original merits of my two cases?

But again, how can you see that when your selection to head the FBI is someone with that much connection to the market? It was as if one said to the like of this guy you already have everything, why bother, take the FBI with that too.

23

Continuing from the post below, isn't it interesting that despite adding this kind of behaviour, the pizza rat video was brought without caring about how much its similarity to me is in smallness in size relative to the carried  task and to him in its behaviour of passing through sewage and other dirty paths?     

22

By the way, speaking about his attempts to degrade my character I mentioned in post#20 and since many already chose to degrade themselves even much lower than the intended destination for my character by accepting such communications about me in the privacy of my own home from him, it may not be a bad idea to fight the deception of the psychotics a little bit also here. Much of that which this guy was conveying from that neighbor of mine would have been seen as no occasion created from scratch fabrications to a person sitting in his chair with me in the same room if there was one. I am using this assumption to show how applicable to be  reasonably called lying was what I called in the past misinterpretation. 

[(Added 1/12/16) I wrote the word "Much" in "Much of that which this guy.." thinking that it would be more than equivalent to "Most". I probably still venture prematurely to think that I mastered a use people make of a common word in this language]

21

Notice the guy's attitude of acting in playful way as if things never really touch him. The depth of the meaning of such attitude becomes better lighted when it gets combined with how much of the guy's interaction with me involves the creation of an environment for me from a God like position away from direct presence.

20

Imagine, they put him in a God like position that even when he wants to deal with  something bad or degrading he had did or does to my character, he makes some balance that with degrading themselves while  he stays in his high and above position.    

19

I made the guy that offer, after all what he did, in front of everybody trying to show who would still continue to support him escaping the consequences of taking the arrogant careless path  he chose. It turned out that they break the scale of shamelessness for him and move on without even noticing. With their way of holding the guy above being responsible, their support is almost like calling on the other side to join them in worshiping a new God.  

  

18

I have recently noticed how hard it is to find where the expression "fighting for the soul" of something can fit more than the situation here. The soul of this country was robbed and its body lays under some of the highest mountains of waste on the earth with the level of corruption out there. From democracy to basic real existence, this country is nothing more than a joke and a toy to the corruption forces and their psychotic desires.

17

In general, I am not willing to take as external, and therefore real, what is internal to this guy's game.

16

Of course for each his own choices. But I am not inclined to take more than what is as little as possible in making this guy take credit for achievements inside with his lead and control, using things done for the sake of others with him. No, he took everybody and made them come through him isolating me from their representations for themselves in the matter.  

15

5/6 of the first offer I made the guy was based on an amount he seemed to be showing himself to those on the other side as being ready to settle for before the decision on my petition and what followed later. If it were me in the position of those on the other side, I would have taken the guy on that claim and opened my own communication path to the other side before letting him add one mess after another.

[(added 12/18/15) 5/6 of the first offer I made the guy was based on an amount he seemed to be publicly showing himself ..]

14

Before deciding on the path of playing such games, I wonder, who in his right mind would have depended on this corruption guy to be the one, and only one, in the middle communicating a solution that should have brought the two sides together here, if an alternative was possible,?

Notice how the corruption guy here successfully isolated me and prevented the connection of the minds of the two parties, directly or through an intermediary, even for one second without his knowledge. That is how psychos take control of the world.       

13

It is not even like that I barely hold myself from seeing other events of the kind as fake then cross that line here. On the contrary, even with an event like that of the prevention of the attack in a train in France , which is relatively much easier to be fabricated, I never feel anything calling on me to see it as fake. On the other hand, with the two events I mentioned below, and other fabricated domestic attacks here, I never feel any calling on me to see them as real.

    

12

Before they attempt to play the game of what is real and what is fake on me here, had they yet at least realized the correct answer to this question with regard to the trial related to the case of the killing of Trayvon Martin in Florida? 

11

Let us state this clearly. The government with its partners fabricated the alleged attack in San Bernardino California and the one in Chattanooga Tennessee several months before. Aside from others, the guy in the white house and his FBI director  are themselves part of the game. 

It seems like the corruption guy started by himself fabricating stories like breach of data security at this or that company with the role of the government and its FBI being just toleration, at most. They then completely joined him in the alleged hacking of Sony and moved from there to the level described above. 

10

I did not catch the thing from the beginning but it sounded like they brought that FBI director to testify about that alleged attack in California. Too bad! Now I doubt the existence of California.

9

Again regarding the guy in the post below, although I may like to play along and talk to a ventriloquist's dummy, that does not necessarily mean I recognize its serious existence. He, made that statement about preventing some group from entering the country probably trying to show a reaction that would support the recent fabricated attack look real. But that intention was betrayed by how premature it sounded.      

8

Somebody has been using that guy currently claimed to be topping the republican candidate list to say things counter to his own intelligence which could be one of those examples demonstrating the unfair taxing on the poor.

It is unbelievable how the system here tolerates the invasion of this guy to my privacy as if I am an object he owns! 

Continuing from the post below:

In case somebody thinks otherwise, I did not change course from  a general talk like that because of that silencing reaction. No, I put an effort to avoid such talk because I recognized that this is a significantly different place to what I came from in how much the identity complex could use that causing injustice at the individual level.     

NBC TV Network did not change from its path by allowing that presidential candidate to host its show. It only provided help to those who did not already see the conspiracy between the two. It is a repetition of the one with that cooking lady I wrote about before . The guy who asked the question about Muslims was also not acting on his own and without arrangements with that candidate   

Having said that people may need to think before they seek equality by imitating the silencing reaction used in another group to prevent others from complaining against what is being done by members in it and  the inexcusable support to each other you see. Instead they may want to make a better use for the advantage of position that does not seek a diversion  from the issue.

A government watching and tolerating like this government is watching this guy having all the freedom he currently has over my Internet privacy is placing itself at the disgusting level of how a government should be. And no, having some celebrities complaining about how their accounts were hacked and the like does not balance things out by giving the excuse of widespread problem regardless of whether one thinks it was intended for that purpose or not. Nothing is like what has been happening here, and for years, with this guy's government granted privilege over my privacy.        

And these hacking stories from Target and the like to celebrities to North Korea with Sony and China with insurance companies or whatever and even some similar things attributed to ISIS were caused by him playing around and trying to distract others from his sever invading to my privacy and, at least with Sony's story, partly trying to show me his control and how much corrupted cooperation he can pull. 

What strengthened more my confidence in that or at least made me less hesitant to emphasize such view despite its megalomaniac look is the ease with which I saw him pull all the level of corruption I saw him create publicly in the past few months. 

Actually, with little attention to the history sequence of those hacking claims one can see how the claims were increasing in intensity as if somebody crossing one line after another while watching out for the reactions.  

This is not a government. This is an extremely dirty swamp of corruption we are trapped in and no body cares. Aside from other things, look at how long it has been like a public knowledge to them that this corruption guy is a permanent invader to my privacy over the Internet watching every thing I do and they are OK with it. 

I wonder how much the sinking to this level in morality and dignity with all this media fabricated stories and public conspiracy is enjoyable because it doesn't seem to serve any material purpose and much less the one it might have been intended for. However, and I repeat this again, in order not to make this abyss a bottomless one, at least a line should be drawn when it comes to such actions coming from the cops and the FBI or other entities trusted in applying and enforcing the law. 

  

I mentioned the time and the network in the previous post in order to help identify which episode of that show I was referring. The time is Eastern Time and the location, just in case that network programs can differ by location, is east Tennessee. 

At 12:30 am today I watched one of those Forensic Files shows aired on the Escape TV network. That show was about the killing of a girl, who was arrested for use of drugs, by her boyfriend when she was about to tell on him, according to the show in exchange for making a deal on her drug charges, for involvement in committing a murder in a black neighborhood, the thing that fits with him being accused as a white supremacist. The show was about how the advance analysis of tiny evidence from a refrigerator belonging to the boyfriend in which the body of that girl was kept for some time helped in convicting him as being the killer and how the police chief kept that refrigerator all that time despite providing no evidencing benefit.

After watching the show I suddenly noticed how it was left a big necessary question unanswered. How did the boyfriend know that the girl who was at police custody was about to tell on him for him to come pay her bail to take her home then kill her? 

Also the girl arrest for drug use in the home of the boyfriend where she was living happened when the cops came to talk with boyfriend about that murder and did not find him home. What police detectives concern themselves about the use of drugs by a person while they are in the process of investigating a homicide? On the other hand, that seems to fit with over compensating not finding the boyfriend at home as something arranged with the police. Or it could be that the girl was the real intended target of the visit by the police in order to keep her away from noticing what her boyfriend was doing by keeping her in prison for drug charges but that path fired back with her wanting to reveal what the boyfriend did . 

The show also talked about how the police chief was seen as behaving crazy or unreasonably trying to find the body of that girl which could be, together with the keeping of that refrigerator all that time, intended to compensate for less than serious investigation.The case was also resolved after the guy was already in jail and enough time had passed to disable the capability to prosecute the mother and sister of that guy, living in the same house, because of covering evidences of the killing and not reporting it.

In short, answering the main question about how the guy knew that the girl was about to tell on him negatively regarding the role of the cops in that can also find support in other things in the picture.

Was that girl betrayed to death by the cops themselves? Did the same people taking credit for prosecuting her killer knowingly conspired creating what led her to death ?

Of course this could be entirely wrong but I couldn't let that obvious question go without pointing it out despite speaking from my stage here.