148

The sewage called Youtube is giving this corruption rat..sorry.. big corruption rat a pass on even interrupting a video I am watching with a commercial even though there was no sign it contains any. 

By the way, I can find what I look for elsewhere in the internet but I use that site because there is at least a path for those who want to complain for their copy rights here. That is especially true for materials from where I came from.   

147

This rat continues not to leave me without messing my things. You turn your head away from one thing, you get another. About a week ago I ordered six rolls of the kind of paper needed for the petition to the court from, apparently another group of corruption mice, a site called Lexjet.com. I ordered six and my credit card was charged for six but with an unexplainable corruption audacity they delivered me only one. Even if this was a partial delivery, they did not tell me that when I contacted them about the order and gave me the tracking number neither there is anything to indicate that on the package I received. 

With the earlier petition, the UPS guy refused to deliver the papers until I myself went to the UPS center and brought them.   

Writing this made me lose about an hour of time.   

146

continuing from the preceding post:
Electricity was brought back yesterday at about 8 pm adding another sign that the power outage was arranged with this corruption rat, . But then Charter's little mice started their turn in serving the master rat and I did not get to the internet service from them until a few minuets ago.

145

Continuing from the preceding post
There is even less excuse and the situation looks manufactured and wanted to continue even more than the previous episode. The weather situation lasted only minutes and was not that significant and this day has been good from the beginning but we continue to have no electricity because the electric company is serving its master, the corruption rat. I have never been in power outage that looked as intentional in its continuity, let alone how it started especially with the current one, than it is with those two episodes. Of course later in the news made for the rat there could be, like the previous situation, stories about other places that stayed longer with the power outage as if even if one wants to ignore the special things of this situation, the corruption rat has kept any value to the news media
around us to be trusted after all what he had used it for.

144

I have been without electricity since 10:30 pm Eastern Time yesterday courtesy of this corruption rat and the mice of the electric company repeating the same game on me they played couple of years ago. I am posting from my cell phone.

143

Why is it okay for this guy to do all the fraud he does in the market? Would it be strange to see an ordinary person gets prosecuted for even just one of the ordinary fraud actions of this guy? Or is it that the law is only applicable there? In addition to his actions with the trading of stocks, he even creates fake corporations or assign fake leaderships to those he controls pretending being a separate entity while he pulls the strings inside. How is it that all of that is okay? (Also imagine how he tries to pull a fake president for the country while his fake CEO show for the stock I mentioned in the preceding posts about the Ask price being lower than the Bid, has been to me like one of those children shows where you can see the strings moving the dummies, despite how the environment there allows for much stronger isolation).

142

Upon reflecting on my situation, I am not sure that being on the other side allows me to throw the responsibility of the actions I see as bad to the system on the side doing those actions without myself being a participant. The integrity of the system should always be at the best it can be and never sacrificed even for one second. Even just reasonably, as much as the reason was the integrity of the system to begin with, what has been happening here does not make sense. Should we just close our eyes now then start over when things are over?  

My desire to show how much I am not affected by what have been going on has led me to be light years away from my natural behaviour here. However, I now realize how I missed seeing that as tolerating what is going on for material benefit could even make more sense as accusation. Therefore I tell all those doing those things to the system that if you think that I am willing to trade-off even a tiny bit of what you are doing for such a gain then you are in different universe from where I am. So if that is out of the picture then why are you doing what you are doing? Shouldn't you at least check to see if it is the only available path first? Why do you let a psycho have his way suggesting to you that somehow you can create a fake behaviour for the system showing corruption while inside he maintains a satisfaction in that the behaviour of the system is the system?

I know that I could have confused things, especially toward the court, speaking from an external point of view without sufficiently emphasizing the internal one but I intend to no longer even blink from seeing myself as part of the system.   

    

141

Related to post 139, look how beautiful it is that he continues to show an Ask lower than a Bid price on the streaming quotes. The situation of this country with corruption, if describe sufficiently, can very easily serve as vomiting inducing medicine for so many people living under dictatorships because they cant harness the military power enslaving them.

Like I mentioned before, I have seen this guy manipulate stock volume in fake buying and selling to himself to make a volume of over 30 million shares in the first hour or half of the day for a stock that hardly trades and I wrote about that to that swamp of corruption called the Securities and Exchange Commission and it still went like nothing as did other things I wrote to it (but they were fantastic at revealing my name and email to this guy fast from the first time I trusted them on that in 2006). While that was less probable than what you may see on a Bugs Bunny Cartoon, at least it is theoretically possible. But here how is it even possible to have the Ask stays lower than the Bid price? This like seeing water in the higher place not flowing to the lower place despite not being held by anything. The only thing that could stop the buying where there is an ask lower than the bid would be if the seller attaches an All Or Nothing condition (sell all of the shares or do not sell anything) to his broker and I have done that with my asks to sell shares before and have seen that doing so would prevent the ask I put from being displayed as the Ask even though it was for the lowest price.     

140

Every now and then, this corruption rat disables my internet connection then enables it imposing his will and control on when I do not get impeded from doing what I want to do and instead waste my time trying to solve this new situation he imposed on me.  
And with writing just the above he caused me to have 40 minutes of additional wasted time on him and believe it or not he seems to have imposed his will again forcing me to leave posting here temporarily in order to prevent Windows form shutting down my system for an update its time was mysteriously changed from much later I set a little while ago during another interruption for the same update. Even with this Windows update it seems he is involved in using it to frustrate me. Couple of days earlier I opened my computer to do a short task and this same Windows update message came. So I thought it is a good time to proceed with the update now instead of interrupting me later but, again, believe it or not, after I agreed to the update message and even closed for that purpose all open Windows the update did not continue but instead displayed a strange message telling me that they will "take it from here" then went away then came back later and did the interruptions I just mentioned.         

139

Got enough corruption and this guy treating everything like a joke?

Take a look at this SNAPSHOT here for Scottrade trading platform. Look at how the symbol "CTDH", a stock he is playing, has an "ASK" lower than the "Bid". In case these terms need explanation, the "Bid" is the highest price offered for buying shares of the stock while the "Ask" is the lowest price accepted for selling shares. So you can see that an "Ask" lower than the "Bid" situation is impossible to happen. Yet, this has been shown like this here for days and continues even despite reporting it, which, astonishingly enough, brought out arguments trying to justify seeing such situation as a real occurrence.     

138

continuing from the preceding post

That of course comes on top of the absence of my privacy to him through all those things which he still had to supplement with absence of my physical privacy where I live. 

137

This rat, with his allowed access to everything I do over the internet in addition to phone (tracking and calls) and credit cards transactions revealed to him in real-time, already has enough empowerment to practice his joy of positioning himself like God to me or making me his toy. So there is certainly no need to add to that things through the government like him pulling me to jury service on his whim or even worse make the mail refuse to pick a package it was required to pick from me and, still worse, allowed to break and enter into my car repeatedly without any prosecution. Even aside from messing or controlling government related things, while other legislators might think about limiting or regulating how the power this guy has can be used, this guy was allowed here to frustrate me with actions as illegal as preventing me from accessing what I want to access many times over the internet in addition to the phone by taking my input to somewhere else.   

136

I tried to see more probability in that the jury service thing may have not been pulled by this guy given that I have been living in significantly smaller population county for over 5 years but going there made me see enough to make me think it is the work of this guy even had this been about an everyday life thing.      

135

Continuing from the preceding post

He positions himself so that all my communication needs with the outside world to get something done (and how could that be hidden from him given his access to my communication means?) should go through him. He prevents me then he allows me. He is the one who closes and opens the doors for me.

134

One reason I made post 131 was to give an example of how much a guy like this could behave far from what one could expect from seeing how he fits himself with what suggests otherwise elsewhere. While he shows trying to accommodate me with something, he comes from everywhere else to miss or make things more difficult for me or even just to position himself like a God to me allowing me to do things only through the paths he chooses for me (This latter thing reminded me of his externalizing me in my court case so that he can position himself like God toward me in having his behavior above being seen mandated by other things. Even his accommodating attempts in that thing, supposedly directed from behind the scene to me, made me laugh when they brought to my mind the similarity of a major psychotic behavior to which I was subjected, or subjugated, in the main story of my life and saw the shared tendency of trying to defeat reality with abnormal substitutes in order to position the self as God ).       

133

All this non reluctance, actually enjoyment, to put himself above the law and how much others submit to him without caring about the legal consequences, is not a good reason to do a thorough investigation on the actions of this guy and his boss? But who would do that? The same people his boss push to the government power seats?

Where I came from, when I was a child, hearing comments during American movies about how it is for sure that some guy in the movie is the bad guy but he could not be touched because of lack of evidence felt very unconvincing to me for reality situations. After living in this country this long and seen what I have seen, from the joke called the Securities and Exchange Commission to the rest of the government in recent years, I began to recognize how much I could have been right then. It seems very probable now to me that the reason this country lived that organized crime gang period had much more to do with corruption in the government than it is generally thought and that was replaced by this which is much less sever in comparison but also cannot be seen not involving the much higher levels in the government.      

132

Still, what is in the preceding post, even if considered in the same domain, it does not come close to that of crossing the line of breaking  and entering into my car, and not even once but repeatedly. Or, next to that, it does not even come close to when he makes my internet service provider or the phone company prevent me from accessing some place directly or by diverting my input to that destination from reaching it or replacing it with a different one in order to make it lead to error like in the situations I talked about here. Just a little while ago, I had a website where my input took no effect and I started to wonder if it was also one of those situations.  Imagine living with this guy having the power over you to prevent you from accessing things whenever he wants and freely from any prosecution like this. Sometimes, when I look at how people are forced to submit to the law on that cops show, the severe contrast with the immunity given to this guy makes me wonder: Is this the same country?

By the way, even for a common issue like paying taxes, what is in the behaviour of those in the government toward this guy which can keep the faith that this guy and his boss are held to pay their taxes like the rest of the people?          

131

Imagine having whatever you do over the internet watched by this guy and him using that position to mess things for you. So if the absence of privacy is not enough you have also to suffer through how much a conspiracy rat like this would not resist going behind the scene and doing its thing. And with the power he has to take others to his side, imagine what that could cause. What may take another person five minuets to order over the internet, could take me well over an hour sifting through things trying to avoid him coming from everywhere. Recently he has been working on frustrating my effort to have a lawn mowing service. In addition to conspiring with some contractors themselves he seemed to have used a shorter way for doing that through the Homeadviser.com which I was using, and making it play games for him while pretending to be honestly doing its work. Contractors who were in a very short list provided by the website were not showing up after setting the appointments through that website itself. I also tried to use the service of a website called Taskeasy.com, which comes on the top of a google search for a mowing service and it looks like that he has made them back off not just from agreeing on an estimate but, also from proceeding beyond that to take my credit card number for payment. When providing the estimate, which I got from that website twice with weeks of separating period and was the same, the website just took my address and calculated the size of the mowing area on its own. But the conspiracy rat saw me searching the internet trying to figure out why that number was smaller than the size of my lawn on paper (Although I later saw, through the google's satellite picture and comparing the size of the built portion of my lawn to the rest, how much the size calculated by the website itself seems closer to the correct size for what is usually mowed of my lawn than the one on paper) so he apparently used that to provide them with an excuse to shamelessly reprice and back off, not conditionally but totally. He then, after arguing through emails, probably taught them the same thing, which he apparently think of as a magic trick to stop me, to use the phone as a communication medium like he taught the local USPS guy who was supposedly answering my complaint for the intentionally unpicked package (POST 77), to insist on the same thing.  

Last year, I had to tolorate the behaviour of the guy he sent me, which I recognized from the first moment that guy came, through the homeadvisor site which I tried to use for the same service (Although I think, or at least do not have what suggests otherwise, back then that was only based on his watching what I do and not with participation by the website itself).  

130

This fake presidency should stop because it is degrading to the system. Also, for the judges of the final court, how sure they are that their false absent judge claim is not encroaching on the right of others or degrading to the system? Is the risk of such consequences bigger here or if they make use of that waiving of my right I did for them? 

129

He appears to have crossed that personal line again. All what has been going on for him from the FBI locally and nationally sending things like threats with lying and fabricating stories for him to the other branches of government is not enough for him as a message for power and connections. He has to send somebody to break and enter (in the legal sense) into my car every now and then. Let me then tell those with the authority to stop and prosecute him for doing that that I hold them responsible and do not care whether they are really corrupt like this here or just pretending.

I also decided not to let trying to avoid being seen personally affected by his games makes me tolerate his degrading of the system. He is even far from believing they can really benefit his purpose. He is just enjoying making the world his toy. If I am going to tolerate such things why did I do all that fighting to his corrupt ways to begin with? 

I really do not care whatever signals I receive in relation to the prospect of my case if they do not encroach on the right of others or degrade the system or cross a line that is as personal as the one mentioned above. Otherwise, it is a BIG NO!.

128

Despite all what was said here, it seems like this guy has added another breaking and entering to my car detaching from the windshield the suction cup of my camera while it was in the parking lot of Walmart.   

127

About two weeks ago while I was shopping I mistakenly left the car key inside the truck of my car and closed it which led to call a locksmith service. It seems very probable that the guy who came was contacted by this corruption guy. But this is more expected than not for me and it is not why I am writing this. I am writing this because of the way I was led to the guy who came. I was unable to go back to the first page for locksmith service google search on my mobile phone and subsequently the search led me to different results. Because of that I am wondering if with the later search I was not really accessing google and the search result page was a fake one provided by my carrier (Virgin Mobile).        

126

Continuing from the preceding post:

Of course I realize that, having no dependents and no real time job, I have even much less excuse than most other people not to participate in this duty if this call was really generated by the system.  

125

I have a letter I received and put aside because I did not think I need to read it. I have just opened it and it turned out to be a summons for jury duty in the coming month. Is this really from the system or is it that there is hardly a thing this corruption guy cant pull here?  

124

Again I lost time reinstalling my router after what I have no reason to see being other than another malicious interference by this guy intended to disable the device.

123

I want to know what happened to all that breaking and entering this corruption guy did to my car which I reported here (of course I do not mean he did that himself directly)? Was that also a special class of crime not familiar to law enforcement? Or was it left to local authority because it is within its jurisdiction even though the FBI knows things very clearly here? Or is it that the FBI is only ready to interfere for him in fabricating stories and emboldening him?      

122

Again, I had to go through the unnecessary lose of time because the corruption rat could not resist to play his harassing games on me. First, he apparently wanted to surprise me with an unforeseen  margin call (maintenance call) on my Scottrade account even though I have been without any margin debt for years. He strengthened that by making my inquiring emails receive no response until I waited for the next day to check the history and find that margin call had happened, as expected, because of some fee, a 20$ "reorganizing fee" which I was charged because of a reverse split that suddenly came out of the blue and executed for one of the stocks I hold. Still that was apparently not enough for him. So when I went to try to log to my Schwab account to check on what could be also happening there I was asked to change my password before being let into the account. That still could have been seen with more probability that it was not related to the corruption rat if it were not for I was asked a different security question from the one I had chosen. Because of that he probably also enjoyed another instance of forcing his will seeing me resorting to make a phone call to gain access to my account.

     

120

Scums do not expect or fear any prosecution for following what this guy wants them to do regardless of how much they shouldn't do that. This is a dirty swamp not a real place with justice system. You cannot let the mess be at such level and still claim that you want justice and the law to be above corruption.  

119

A little over a month ago I received this LETTER responding to the complaint I mailed to the post master general about the event I wrote about HERE then HERE and HERE. As you can see the response is a joke even more than the response I received from them regarding the indecent of 10:30 pm delivery of my brief to the court in showing they really took the thing seriously. They tell me to talk to my local post office, to which I probably was already referred when I complained HERE. Notice again employing the same childish sarcastic game this corruption guy is probably teaching them of supposedly trying to contact through the phone. However, I did this as a preparation for going to the court. They are fooling themselves if they think I would let this guy push a button and make me disregarded from receiving a service everybody else receives and for no reason like this, and gets away with it this easily. As if the behaviour of that mail carrier showing things like continuing to drive forward when I kept running behind for a while to give her a letter, among other incidents, needed more to manifest more discrimination.

When I talk about going to the court I am not referring to a small claim court. If I am allowed I intend to go to the federal court and again all the way to the final court if needed. It was a pure discriminatory behaviour for no reason and those who participated need to be taught a lesson or at least one who does all what he can by bringing them to where they can be taught a lesson. Even for the purpose of serving this guy it is hard to see how what happened serves anything of value to him except that he just liked to see me denied a basic service everybody else get.

118

The recent monthly payment stub I received from the IRS according to my installment agreement had the "Notice date" of 10/19/16. Add how long it takes for that letter to reach me then think if that is practical for a payment due on the 28th. It seems a repetition play to this story HERE with the improvement that there was no post mark this time (Next time they may work on that "Notice date" thing). Anyway, I still wanted to follow the "You can pay online now at www.irs.gov/directpay" they mentioned. I spent hours yesterday and the day before entering my data and the system continued to be unable to confirm my identity. So are they inviting people to use a system that joke in being unable to recognize somebody who files like me and has been on installment agreement for years or was it another thing caused by this corruption guy? I am not sure.
After that I tried to pay using one of those commercial sites and my check card from Regions continued to be declined for no reason. But the most clear play from this corruption guy happened when I called to activate my card in case I missed to do that earlier. Here a repetition of what suggest a participation by the phone company (Phone Power) like in THIS GAME happened and for two different things. First, I kept selecting the choice number for card activation while the message kept repeating the choices as if I did not enter anything. Then when I called again this guy apparently thought rather than just that one digit selection, why not have more fun and make me repeat entering the card number and the rest of the information required to activate the card and that what happened. My selection number from the menu was recognized but then I stuck on that stage repeating my entry.  
I forgot to say, in case it was understood that I was predicting that the same thing could follow from the IRS like the earlier situation because of a late payment, I ultimately made my payment in time using the higher charge credit card option.  

117

And that goes on top of what I described HERE with my Chromebook computer turns entirely off if I leave it with no activity for a short period. I couldn't solve the problem but he, probably to show me his control, some days allowed my computer to act normally in that regard.   

116

I moved from youtube, now he forces his will or takes control of all my computer not just one tab or one window. Look HERE. The small window on top and the tab behind it both appeared from clicking something entirely unrelated in the adjacent tab on the left.

115

As an alternative to pausing what I watch until I click it to continue, look at the length of the advertisement this corruption guy put HERE. Does everybody else gets over six hours advertisement  on youtube (although as you can see he still came back to pause the video before I take this screen snapshot)?

114

Continuing from the preceding post

Notice that the time counting also stopped with the external pause. Here is A SECOND SNAPSHOT for the same pause taken after I chose to remove one of the adds on the side. You can see that time counting was still the same as the earlier SCREEN SNAPSHOT including that "You can skip video in 1" shown on the bottom right side. 

113

This SCREEN SNAPSHOT taken just hours ago, shows this guy externally pausing what I was watching. A bit later I clicked the video then clicked it again to pause it and captured  THIS SNAPSHOT. You can see that when the video was paused by the user there is no arrow button in the middle of the screen (It would have been much harder to prove external action had he done the pause through my computer). 

112

I have this guy just some hours ago pausing the video on my computer, which is something he does forcing his will. But then he followed that by turning the Youtube video I was about to watch back to the one I had just chosen not to watch then he opened about 20 or so new tabs. He also continued to play various things like sizing or minimizing and maximizing windows on my computer all in front of me.

111

Remember what I wrote HERE about this guy getting into my car? In June or July of this year I reattached my GPS screen again and traveled over 300 interstate miles with it not showing any kind of being destabilized. After that, one day I drove with it still seems strongly fixed in its place. I went inside a supermarket then when I came out and drove my car a little again that screen fall to the ground. I was surprised and wondered if I were wrong about how stable that thing is. I did not give much attention that this corruption guy could have sent somebody to enter my car again. That was until some day later I came out of a store to find out my windshield camera which also has not shown any sign of being shaken or unstable was completely separated from the windshield and was dangling from its wire. Now I feel I would be surprised if it turns out that the corruption guy did not send somebody again to enter my car and do these things.   

110

Another thing that shows what I described in the post below being abnormal situation is that every time I turn my Chromebook on I receive the message indicating that Chrome was not shut down properly. 

109

By the way, he probably have recently added a new game to those in which he forces his will while I use my computers. Now my Chromebook turns off any time I leave it without activity for a short time then requires me to re enter the password when I turn it on again. This happens whether I close it or keep it open and even after choosing the "Power wash" option to clean it. Sometimes he like to have more fun and requires me to do the complete two steps log in process.           

108

I said "apparently" not because I saw sufficient things suggesting what is going on was not maliciously intended but because I hesitated on how much of that could be the guy doing things through viruses. However, the problem being connecting to the internet, I forget to check for skipping the Wi-Fi router and connect my computer directly to the cable modem which is what I am doing now. But I think the audacity of the earlier games involving faking web site portals or interrupting and replacing my input to the real one with a wrong input, on some of which I posted those videos, made me go directly to my cell phone. 

Anyway, this wouldn't be the first time my Wi-Fi router was maliciously messed and I had to reinstall it. Still this was not necessarily all what happened and necessarily done without Charter's help.       

107

Again my internet access was taken away and appearently Charter is again doing that serving the corruption guy. I am posting this from my cell phone.

106

Yes, I should have put better effort to search on that before writing what I wrote and accused the FBI and the rest of the executive authority on this issue and for that it takes from my credibility whatever it takes. But remember how much my talk was from how things appear to me and even wondered if there is an argument justifying doing it.

While this issue was the one, at least psychologically, affecting me the most, notice that it does not extend to the games he plays on me in accessing the internet and its sites or the viruses he put in my computers. This is merely about the ISP giving him knowledge about my internet navigation.

Having that legal or not sufficiently clear as illegal is much more tolerable to me than it being otherwise but still see my privacy being left to him like it is free space and despite how publicly he shows knowledge about what I do there.    

105

Guess what? It appears that there is no law or any legal precedent directly against the ISP's revealing information about internet navigation of his client. So if one wants to be the first here he may need to supply the legal argument.   

104

This is a very stinky dirt. They refuse to go after the like of this corruption guy publicly like this and still expect us to have faith in a just law enforcement that treats everybody equally?! 

Again, I am not asking from the scums running the government to help me against his financial power and connections or the cheap rat paths through which he passes to do his things. They have already seen to what level he sank trying to debase and make a joke of me using what is communicated to him from others based on the proximity to my place. But I still did not complain that he should be prosecuted for that because there was no law violation.

Also if he hires thousands of lawyers to work together to find a real legal view justifying his invasion of my privacy on the internet, I still would not ask the government to empower me the same way.

But if it is a clear violation or probable violation like this and somebody has been treated like being a no boundary free space like this then the government should go after him for that if it is being run by anything other than very dirty cockroaches. 

103

Such a privilege given to the corruption guy on my privacy, probably should at least have been something one discovers as a scandal for the secret inside working of the FBI and others. But if they publicly act this way, what could be done for this guy inside?

If that entity acts in front of us with this level of corruption is there anyway to have faith in it acting on the hidden things in the back?

Is this the entity that one should look for to protect his rights and stand for him where he himself do not know what is happening to him?

All this public knowledge about the guy's continuous invasion to my privacy on my computer, imagine I were one of those special computer guys doing that the other way around on him, how long do you think the situation would have continued before I get arrested and my computers taken as evidence? If I am lucky I probably would get a warning about it a short period after doing that. But for me to continue doing that like this guy and with this audacity, you may have to upgrade the assumption from even being a computer genius to a real magician capable of doing that from his prison cell.    

102

The choosing of James Comey to lead the FBI was the final nail in the coffin of having any remaining faith in that entity to be really against corruption and really prosecute the like of this guy. We wanted the SEC to be like the FBI, the guy in the white house with the help of those wonderful guys at the senate made the FBI like the SEC. Those guys may only approve a nominee with less than 97 percent if some of them were away preparing drinks for the party.

Any wonder why the boss of this corruption guy is at the stage of pushing his guys for the presidency this time.

And for our current white house resident, just knock the wood. He is thinking about how he will retire after his presidency. Because he had done his job and the country is working like clock free from corruption, right?

I need to tell him that I got a package to show him. If you think this sounds like a dirty talk, you are right. But it is not what you think. The package I want him to see is the plastic bag containing food and designated to be picked up and carried by the mail but the mail carrier refused to take it for no reason  just because this corruption guy issued his order for that and is still in my house. The corruption level this shows is much dirtier than whatever you may had in mind. And, although wrong, just in case you think they do not need to go after this because it was not related to a big thing, a similar thing was done before with a package sent to a federal court of appeals. 

   

101

It should be noted that even if my case that reached the final court gets solved tomorrow, that still would not affect a bit my demand for my privacy here.  

100

Back to the need to be treated like a human being with a right to privacy from this guy. Continuing from post 96, there are three possible paths for the guy to invade my privacy in the Internet like this. Either he is using viruses he injects into my computers. Or he is getting that through my ISP provider. Or he is getting that through search engines I use. So which one of those three paths legally allows doing that or has an argument for the legality of it strong enough to stop the FBI and other law enforcement agencies with the applicable jurisdiction from prosecuting the guy or at least making him cease and desist if their corruption is not what is stopping them? Remember, the corruption guy has been, for years now, revealing knowledge of things I do over the Internet and in a way clearly suggesting knowing everything I do at the same time I do. The notion that he watches and knows what I do over the internet can hardly be seen other than a widely known and far from being honestly disputed fact.

     

99

And I remember submitting a complaint to the FBI about THIS. Anything did they do about it? Probably only in the sleeping dreams of somebody. The things were very clearly showing cooperation on preventing me from transferring my shares and that was a request I only did to test if I was really adding shares to my account when I buy or merely being shown a bigger number in my holding. 

98

Even for just one incident, imagine if it were I who conspired and kept him hear "Goodbye" then the call ends every time he calls his bank for a week until he went to the branch and discovered that call answer was only happening on his landline phone number like he did to me ("Probably just for fun")? How many charges I would have faced for that?  

97

And how about all the times this guy made my internet provider prevent me from reaching a website or from accessing a website posing as the portal to that website or just simply interrupt my input to the real portal and replace it with a false one so that I do not gain access? 

Can you tell me that any other person is also allowed the same thing without being prosecuted for it? Can you tell me if it were the other way around and the FBI really knows or have probability as much as they do now that it could be true that I, some how, do those things to him, I would have not been charged with a list of law violation charges? 

96

I ask again: Is there a legal argument sufficiently reducing the probability that this guy has been violating the law by invading my privacy or is it real that I have been left like a free space to him in violation of the law publicly like this with no prosecution or even just making him cease and desist? 

95

On the wiki page about Comey I read about how he was supposedly considered for a Supreme Court Judge position. It sounds like something from the corruption power that pushed Comey for his position. However, in addition to questioning that, I also wondered about how the importance of the position of an FBI director was not sufficiently accounted for to the level that such claim was probably thought to make him look overqualified. They apparently do not pay sufficient attention to how everything a judge does is seen publicly or can be made public by the parties of a complaint while people have to depend on hidden actions from this guy on things inside.   

94

Why doesn't Comey testify why he is not prosecuting this guy for all the invasion of privacy he does or at least make him stop? Why doesn't he explain what legal path allows this guy to know everything I do over the internet?

This country is eaten by corruption. Yet they make Comey leads the FBI. Nominating and approving nomination is not a situation of innocent until proven guilty. You need to make the best choice and feel confident about the way you answer doubts beyond depending on assumption. Aside from anything else, can anyone in those who nominated and approved this guy say they carried their duties to even a modest level in making a guy who previously held a job at the financial market take such a position despite this control of the financial power on the country? And have they missed how connections play a role in that world for them to assume one could get there and remains clean that easily in one of the most susceptible places on earth for being affected? 

93

It seems as if Charter is cutting internet access from me serving this guy. Today it was cut for about six hours probably until the corruption guy allowed restoring it to me.

No body fear any prosecution for cooperating with this guy here. The situation is beyond being a joke. If anything, cooperating with this guy may insure being on the side of government.  

92

Back to the issue of my privacy, I just want to ask one simple question. It is like a public knowledge, and has been so for years, that this corruption guy know every thing I do over the internet. My question is: How does every body, especially those in the law enforcement and the top of the executive branch, think the guy obtains the information they hear? How could anyone honestly say there isn't at least an amount of suspicion sufficient to cause going after what this guy has been doing here to see the legality of it? Why is it accepted publicly accepted like this that my privacy can be continuously invaded by this guy like I do not exist?

91

As shown HERE, I started with claims "about the alleged death of Justice Scalia and/or how the court is equally divided on my case". Then in post 297 I expanded that to "all claims about all levels of inclination" before expanding that again to include "any claim about the judges of the court". 

90

Instead of the encroachment on others playing those Terrorism allegation games, I gave the guy the opportunity to make direct false claims about what the judges of the court are going to do to my case by waiving any right I may have against the falsehood of those claims.

Remember, I said that everybody, including the judges themselves, can make any claim, false or true, about the judges or what they are going to do to my case without affecting my rights because of making those claims (subject to the limitation I stated HERE). In other words, while how the case will be resolved count, for my part, any allegation about that does not. 

So, if he wants to scare me off, it is hard to think of a better or more empowering tool to give him than this which I gave since March.  

   

89

As much as this corruption guy thinks he is defying the reason for my case in the big picture by involving the rest of the government to this level as much as he could be supplementing it.  

88

Actually, even that talk should be needed for somebody who at least from the outside acts acceptably. Here, with an FBI director and his subordinates themselves lying about the occurrence of crimes, it is mind boggling to see them still in their positions even before you dig any deeper.

And your congress seems cool with all that , if not themselves participating in that lying, as if approving James Comey at the senate by , as I remember, 98 percent, or something like that was not enough guilt or degrading thing on their part to begin with.

I, on the other hand, questioned that guy taking this position from the beginning and you did not need to wait long to see him behaving in this corrupt manner. Had any director acted like this before? 

He started with the Sony cyber attack fabrication and I questioned that before he proves me right once again about him and move to make clear fabrications like the ones we currently have. 

By the way, apparently the guy was approved and set to stay until 2023 for us to enjoy his corruption.

87

Until I have privacy and lines this guy cant cross I don't feel I really exist. I demand freedom from this new form of slavery. I demand a law enforcement that could prosecute this guy for invading my privacy even if I myself did not know he did, let alone when it is clear that he is not just invading but more like confiscating it. I demand a law enforcement that causes worrying that an invalid cooperation with this guy could be discovered, instead of counting on his backing to do the most outrageous things publicly.

This law enforcement is a sinkhole of corruption that wouldn't care if you bring evidences against this guy that would hit them on the face let alone having them to honestly back you were you yourself don't know you were violated.  

86

As if I did not already have enough to ask this question. All this public conspiring and lying by government officials, is this a real government? How is it that such situation is even remotely tolerable? How can anyone trust someone who shamelessly fabricate things and lie like this in anything, let alone running the country? If they do these things publicly for the service of the corruption guy, do you think they really apply the rules on him like everybody else where nobody can see anything? Just one of those stories they keep fabricating is enough to drag to the lowest scale in moral values and integrity, let alone the legal consequences.  Just one of those stories is enough to make you ask: Is this really a president? Is that really an FBI director? Is this really a government running a country? 

Don't get me wrong. When it comes to affecting me with these games they are light years away from doing that.The corruption guy has been making those "officials" degrade the system and themselves for nothing. But how about the effect on other people?

They are fabricating Terrorism attacks! How is it even remotely acceptable to allege such false things on the group to which the attackers supposedly belong? And how about those who really had suffered such attacks? I was hoping that they, especially with all the showing of care and concern about Terrorism here, would at least respect the real victims of such events enough not to cause confusing real suffering with fake. Unfortunately, I was in another world and nothing is too sacred for the corruption guy and his boss to trample and make a joke of it. And all this is not even because of a question of survival or even remotely close to that for them.

85

How beautiful is that? The corruption guy presses one button and he makes my brief delivered to an appellate court at 10:30 in the night. He presses another one and the mail carrier denies me a basic service refusing to pick up my package, on a day that was specially designated for those packages, for no reason and leave it out there in front of every body (By the way, I don't even send any mail through my mailbox. Instead I drop my mail in street mail boxes).

Speaking about denying basic service, this guy may think I did not know that the period my area stayed without electricity during the time of the so called polar cortex was a thing intentionally created as service to him.  

      

84

continuing from post 77

As if the privilege given to him on my privacy with the various other crossing of lines and games he is allowed to play on me is not enough, he emboldens others on me and makes them deny me service directly for no reason. Then, because they are backed by him, if I complain nothing happen to them  even in a federal government entity like the postal service . 

83

I hope that supporters of Trump and Sanders will not one day go to a puppet show and think the dummies they see move on their own.

82

continuing from the preceding post

In addition to the timing, I wonder if Sanders's rival was like one or two superdelegates away from the number for nomination or was it that a big chunk of superdelegates suddenly came to its side and nobody questioned that it stopped exactly at the number required for nomination, not even one superdelegate more than what is needed?

81

News are being spread by the media that Sanders's rival had obtained the required delegate count for nomination. A simple google search showed that she still doesn't have the required number in voting based delegates. But they counted in pledges from superdelegates. So one purpose could be to tell her voters that their votes are not needed so her rival can as much as possible exchanges the superdelegates who supposedly went to her with voting based delegates he gets in the election then if he exceeds her voting based delegate count he could claim that he is the legitimate winner.  

80

It is ridiculous how much the absence of prosecution because of the corruption makes others do what this guy wants without fear of consequences.

79

continuing from post 77
How often have such a thing happened? I was denied service, and publicly so, by a federal government official and it went like OK.  

78

It has always sounded to me as if the situation with Edward Snowden was created by somebody who was trying to threaten the government in response to its reaction toward what I sent the senate about my case with the courts. Then before I carry out what I intended to write regarding how the creation of the Sanders hype was the other side to the same Snowden coin, the strength of that view became doubled with the change in Sanders behaviour to a threatening one after facing how his wining in voting based delegates is a remote probability.

Trump, Sanders and Snowden all belong to the same entity but they just use different styles for their service to it.

77

I submitted a complaint to the postal service regarding what I mentioned in POST 61. What was their reaction? Nothing except for requesting in their emails to communicate through the phone despite not explaining why that medium is needed or stating anything that could suggest such use would make a difference.

It sounded more like following the advice of this corruption guy to replay that trick when they sent me what sounded like a childish request for my phone number again after I told them that they can tell me whatever they want on email. I also pointed out that I myself haven't done anything to speak about except being selected by the mail carrier to be refused the service.

I had the food stayed on top of my mail box until I brought it back home after 8 pm on that day, in a bag they themselves delivered to me for that purpose, and they think it would go like that?   

By the way, the selection of the communication or response medium was in the complaint itself and I selected Email.

76

As an example of how corruption could find its way, I once checked on one of those judges who behaved badly in my case and found that judge was recommended to the president for nomination by a veteran who lost most of his limbs in battles. So if recognizing Sanders is difficult for you then good luck with the like of that.

Actually, at the level of making and insisting on claims like those which came from Sanders regarding funding his campaign, failing to figure out someone feels like lowering for the world itself. Those were not slips of tongue or occasional misbehaviour. Those were part of a position intentionally and continuously maintained. You could hardly get a clearer sign in life.  

75

Another sample of how I live far from a free freeman should be let to live, yesterday I experienced what was very probably, as usual, the work of the corruption guy in cutting me from the internet service until he decided to connect me back.  

74

Sorry boss of the corruption guy, your overestimation for the power it had in making that very doubtful claim probably cost you a corruption sleeper cell you have been keeping clean and away from suspicion for years. However, I personally did not really need that and already internally found it hard to give your guy more than the lowest score in morality based merely on his talking.

73

Even that grievance for Sanders made on the NBC's Saturday Night show was a fraudulent one. His rival did not get a single voting based delegate, where Sanders is still trailing her, more than she earned in that state. The allegation counted in superdelegates, who are neither based on voting nor bound to any commitment they make. 
It just doesn't feel good letting someone pass with a fraudulent grievance in front of everybody.  

72

If Sanders become the democratic nominee we could all enjoy watching a good pillow fight with Trump to decide  the presidency.  

71

continuing from post 68

Despite calling this President as corrupt, one may need to be careful not to confuse those who choose to act corruptly in some specific things from those who are more like agents or extensions to the corruption guy (including his boss of course).

70

Searching for a president? Those in the government who resisted and were not taken by the corruption guy should get credit for that. Tests like what happened in my case should not be ignored. 

69

I repeat again, I refuse to exist having no boundary against this guy. This is nothing more than a new form of slavery. The invasion to my privacy is a public knowledge and nobody cares. Does it look like to anyone that the FBI is holding this corruption guy accountable for his actions anywhere like the ordinary person? They are not even stopping him from continuing his actions let alone holding him responsible for what he did. Is it any wonder all the arbitration clauses you see? Because for the like of this guy it is known that if you just pass the civil entity itself you get the whole field open for you with hardly any questioning to what you do.   

68

Does that guy realize how desperate his use of the word "crooked" against that other candidate looks like?
Speaking about corrupt liars, even though this President will go, are we supposed to continue with this FBI director?

67

I just want to ask supporters of Sanders this. Do you believe that he has been funding his campaign through the small donations from ordinary people as he alleged? If you don't then think what does that imply on the charachter of the person who falsely alleges such thing for himself and receives the advantage it gives him over his rivals? How about when he himself brings that contrast to mind when he uses pointing out things like the paid speeches against another candidate? How could such a fraudulent behaviour passes as OK thing?

Although thinking otherwise sounds like a joke, remember suspicion in things like these may not need to reach the level of certainty required to make judgment on the person because that is not the main objective when trying to make the best choice.

Six years ago, in reaction to what this corruption guy was doing, I talked about those whom I called deceptive psychotics (although there is much redundancy in that than meets the eye) and how much they depend on character deception and the magnitude of how convincing their character assumption. Even if I were to bring an example for that it would have been more like something the reader would look at externally. This situation on the other hand makes people live seeing how a character could be convincing to make some ignore the facts to this level. However, one may need to be careful that he still may not have seen much of this kind of convincing yet.  

66

If you wonder what to make of that Trump's telephone call story it is not hard to see it in light of his previous activities serving the corruption guy here. Most probably it was him who revealed that tape intentionally trying to claim fraudulent activity on himself to defend Sanders. He is acting as if he thinks he is so immune that instead of being affected by something like this the view to the thing itself and its kind would become less bad. He is probably lying in denying himself intentionally trying to make things worse.

Much of the character issue implied in the story of the tape itself depends on the kind of relationship he had with the other side but this adds other dimension to it regardless .

His contradiction to himself about seeking funds to support his campaign is probably at least partly for the same purpose.

Also, the story about Sanders supporters and their reaction in a democratic party event and  the death threats they supposedly sent seems to show intentional creation of something at least partly to suggest violent nature in his supporters to counter the claim that Trumps accusation to them was intended to help cover the connection between him and Sanders.

65

continuing from the post below

Also with the level of corruption he has been pulling in order to deal with the consequences of his earlier corruption, one cannot escape the question of aiming to defeat the purpose. It fits with what I talked about elsewhere that with characters of this type you may never know who is the real target.

64

Do you see through all the fighting he has been doing how the corruption guy cares for what affect him here compared to how easily and carelessly he pulls his corruption and degrades the system?

63

continuing from the preceding post

And if what Trump said there was another service from him for the corruption guy and his boss, like other things he has been doing, it is an easier path for showing his corruption.

62

I don't know if I paid attention to it earlier, but watching Trump speaks about how another person was bought by Goldman Sachs made me feel somewhat baffled about the level of double standard that guy is allowed to get away with. Somebody takes a loan and therefore becomes owned because of that while he still should be considered a free man despite a show given to him where he for years appeared sitting like a king with aids on both of his sides and fire from among those sitting awaiting his judgment, not to mention his business connections and affiliations especially in the most suspicious land for corruption, New York. Even the pretending of NBC to sever connection with him did not last a modest amount of time. He could be seeing himself as an unquestionable fact of life, but it maybe unavoidable to the ordinary person to wonder about why this guy has been given all that media support as if he is the only billionaire in the country. If it is a question of money, do an internet search and see if you can find this guy listed even within the top 30 richest people in this country. Yet he is the one appearing like the one and only.        

61

Although it may not reach the level of interfering with the work of a court, this new mail thing this corruption guy had pulled recently also makes one wonder about the level of corruption that makes people put following him above the law and their duties that easily. You know those plastic bags with mail permit number where you can put none perishable food then leave them outside to be picked and delivered by the mail. I received one of them in the mail so I went out and bought a number of instances for two items to fill the bag with for the specified date. It clearly was not something unnoticeable to the corruption guy who could have at least known that from my credit card transactions. So what could he have done to that? The mail carrier for no reason made me the special exception to her duty on that date. She refused to pickup the bag and did that in front of my surveillance cameras. She did not even deliver mail or come close to mail boxes on my house side of the road on that date. Instead she chose to drive forward then back on the side away from my mail box on the road.        

60

I wonder if it was noticed how the news about the FBI catching someone with intention to attack a synagogue was timed close to the Indiana democrat's Primary election. It suggests an attempt to help Sanders using his Jewish identity. 

I actually wanted to say the same about the news of that bus thing that seemed artificially made and stunt like as in a movie, in Israel which was timed for the earlier primary before this one added support for the same thing.

According to the news itself, the arrest happened as a result of having the offer made by the undercover FBI agent to the guy to make that attack accepted instead of the later initiating things himself. That shows an admission from the FBI about how much the choice of time came from it. What also adds to the question of timing having that entity says the public was never in danger.

Also, the connection to Israel mentioned above was itself preceded by other connections related to which I also wanted to mention earlier how they show the Israeli Prime Minister working for the boss of the corruption guy here to the level of executing a policy for that purpose that led to blood shed from both sides there. And by the way, I doubt that Trump's talk about closing mosques here was just something he took from the news instead of him being in the depth about what was going on and how things were pulled from here to happen there.

With or without that Trump thing, the things can easily fit to connect for the corruption guy and his boss and how for his service Jewish related things are being used.

So how much there is a probability that all those are just volunteering their help to Sanders and he is not part of the group?Even if we add to that his claim of how much his campaign runs on funding from regular people?

Yet he is the one who kept throwing stones on that other democratic candidate for taking money to do speeches.

I think that some may falsely believe that they can corruptly define corruption and control seeing it.

And of course, adding Trump to the picture helps to support the picture even more with things like what I mentioned in earlier posts and Trump's claim that those who were disturbing his gatherings were Sander's supporters later.

Anyway, if there was made an exception about the corruption of the FBI with things related to me and my situation with this corruption guy, here is some external material suggesting it trying to manipulate the public for that same guy and his boss.  

   

       

59

Imagine always living with this guy here may anytime enjoy exerting a power over you or controlling you by interfering with your things. Yesterday, for example, he apparently decided to stop my Bank of America credit card twice. And while this one happened at home, he used to do this same disturbing thing while I am in a distant city (Speaking about Bank of America it appears that they also abandoned Emails and any similar message sending thing for this guy who pushed for this behaviour after his story here).

You cant go anywhere without his connections following you. At the beginning of this month I had a dentist appointment and dreamed that he would not contact that dentist and mess up my things. Unfortunately, it was just that, a dream. The Hygienist appeared less interested in doing her job after not succeeding with something else related to this guy and now I have to wait for a good cleaning session because this was counted as one.     

58

So that guy now decides to stop the joke and start acting "presidential"? Did anyone tell him that we wanted to play games with him and that it should end whenever he wants it to end? Even worse it can hardly seems to be something unplanned from the beginning that he serves his corrupt billionaire friend or boss then switch back his behaviour later. If he in this state shamelessly speaks about shooting somebody for the service of that guy, what could he be willing to do for him if he becomes the President?    

57

Continuing from the preceding post

And if you wonder that the different seller name for one of the items in the link posted below could be the reason for the difference remember that I reached the other seller by clicking the "Buy it again" link supplied by Amazon itself. So why couldn't it replace the seller or offer to replace the seller in case that seller was unable to fulfill the order because of running out of the item or whatever reason. Anyway, even that is most probably not needed. That is because THIS and THIS, images, show the seller is offering that item and that Amazon itself is directly responsible for fulfillment of orders from that seller.    

56

And if you think this guy leaves me without bothering elsewhere you are wrong. Look at THIS which also shows the corruption in Amazon. The story behind it is that I ordered things yesterday and selected two days shipping speed. However, today I read an email from Amazon stating that the order will be arriving on Monday which sounded too late. So to show that it is also a harassment thing pulled by this guy I went back to my Amazon account and clicked on "buy it again" for both items then selected the two day shipping speed. You can see how the window on the left states that the older order will be delivered on Monday while the smaller one (I had to make it smaller in order to show the "Shipping Speed" selected on the other one) showing the order I am in the process of making, on the right, states that the delivery is "guaranteed" to be on Friday 4/22/2016 for exactly the same items. That is of course before the order gets customized  for me for harassment purposes. 

55

The invasion to my privacy over the Internet is always on and in real time and the FBI is not stopping it let alone prosecuting it despite knowing clearly that I am not lying here. Actually, because of the continuity of the action, the word "invasion" can hardly be less expressive here. The much more closer to correctness here is to call what has been going on the occupation to my privacy.

54

continuing from post 52

I hoped that adding the crossing of physical boundary line by entering my car would leave no excuse for not persecuting this guy but apparently it still couldn't bring a match for the shameless corruption here.      

53

I did not like to do this earlier because I don't like empowering changing results based on thinly focused momentous impulse reactions . But now I can more easily say that those who may think that the claim about the level of financial contributions to Sanders campaign from regular persons has even a five percent chance of being credible might be severely deluding themselves. In other words, anyone thinks that he can pass something that is hardly believable as this because of a character playing may need to think again and again. I have seen more than enough of psychotic deceptions that stands on nothing except showing a character that doesn't seem to fit the accusations in my life for me to feel easy about such a thing.  

52

If interruption is not enough, even without the yellow dots I showed HERE , yesterday he suddenly cut something to which I was listening in the middle of it and replaced it with something else of his choice. 

51

The guy wanted to continue playing so he disabled my access to that website again. This time I brought my kitchen Chrome Book and was able to access it on that computer. It is probably not hard for the ISP to distinguish between computers enough to do that. In fact I am not sure that my cell phone did not use the home wifi to access that site when I used it and that is why I concentrated on the different devices and avoided using the different network explanation in the preceding post. Anyway, this time I decided to catch the thing on video. The first video HERE shows me unable to access the site from the computer I usually use then able to do that from the other one (although I failed to manage to use the same portal). Then he returned the capability to access the site to my main laptop so I used that opportunity to intentionally enter a wrong password and show how that leads to a different response in case one thinks that the difference in the first video was the result of entering different passwords and that was recorded in the second video.    

50

While THIS picture, from post 47,  shows my inability to access that website from my computer, THESE two pictures shows me accessing that same site at a very close time on my cell phone. Although just the site address in the first picture above could by itself suggest very high probability that it was faked and the ISP provider for my computer (Charter) diverted me to it.  

49

Back to the things that more probably constitute a tort or a contract infringement even if the other party allows this guy to do them, do you know how it feels having this guy may take away your capability to login to an account of yours at anytime?

It is not just online where he does such malicious actions. I mentioned before how he did the same thing with my attempt to access my bank help over the phone to recover access to my account online (I don't remember how much of the problem I was having online was of his making to begin with). Every time I dial the number of my bank I get "Goodbye" and the call ends. After a week or so, I went to a branch of that bank trying to recover my access online. Although I did not expect them to tell me that they themselves have to dial that same number, I was much more surprised when they dialed that number and everything worked normally without that "Goodbye" and ending the call. I went back home and tried to access that same number again but this time using my cell phone instead of my landline phone and was able to do the same. I told the person there about what I have been experiencing with my calls but what are the chances that he could have believed such a story resulting from this guy having fun and enjoying himself by infringing on my rights like this?

48

continuing from the preceding post

And if you want to include things that may not involve infringing on a contractual right of mine, take a look at THIS. This is something I wanted to watch on YouTube and the yellow dots are interruptions he put for me. In case you wonder why those dots do not continue at the same level with the rest of the movie you need to know about my habit of dividing a movie in two halves instead of watching it all in one sitting. He may also pause what I am playing or interrupt it even despite the absence of such dots.

47

As if the continuous invasion to my privacy is not enough, the guy may disrupt and cause malicious actions whenever he wants. In just this week I had an application over the Internet that was taken different than the way I submitted it.  Second, yesterday I was, for no reason, logged out of my chrome book. Not only that, but my choice for not to be asked for a pass code on that computer was also cancelled. And just a while ago I tried to log in to my mortgage account and received  THIS . To be sure that was something faked by this guy I tried to access the same website using my cell phone and was able to do that without a problem (of course access though the cell phone could have been faked too).   

46

The level of confiscation to my privacy by this guy seems to leave only things like a brain installed chip that can read thoughts and emotions as a room for improvement.   
I actually only relatively lately realized, through his knowledge of things about me, how much further this could have been the situation before I discovered it. That seems to take us back to  the story of Viking Systems Stock in 2010. 

45

I don't know if when a corporation speaks about itself in the privacy agreement whether itself could extend to include some shareholders and they are not considered third parties. I am trying to see if there is a legal issue preventing going after this guy for invading my privacy in everything I do over the Internet or if it is just the shameless corruption.

Even things I do outside like credit card transactions or phone calls he watches or get conveyed to him in real time or very close to that. Is that all legal? Because if it is not then for it to continue like this with all my boundaries crossed like I do not exist and for this long is beyond disgusting.
  

44

Although this Trump vs. Romney shows considerable improvement on the Trump vs. Mccain, Trump vs. Kelly and Trump vs. Hillary (the going to the restroom show) previous installments in the same sequel, it was still not that hard to be seen.

By the way they say that the President grew half an inch taller. Are they counting in nose length nowadays?      

43

I think that Trump sometimes probably gets confused and try to pass what is suitable for the general conspiracy on me, elsewhere. As if it did not appear from the beginning that he  and Sanders are the Bloomberg guy guy's, he recently appeared to have done something that strongly suggests connecting him not even through that hub but directly to the other side although it is still for the sake of that hub. According to the news, he said that he will keep mentioning the Email issue every day if /when he stands directly against Hillary. Now, think about this.Why would someone point out the repetitiveness in his action like this? Instead one would imagine that a candidate would himself state that he did not notice or care and was merely focusing on the issue if he gets questioned about such repetitiveness? What strongly seems to jump to the mind as an explanation is the showing or emphasizing the value of the free pass on that issue which Sanders gave Hillary.

By the way, I would be surprised if Sanders is really getting that much donations from regular people and not the Bloomberg guy. Although, to be fair, except for his targeting connections to Goldman Sachs, up to this point I don't remember seeing him providing direct services back to that guy like Trump.