197

It seems that the behaviour I described in post 195 about this recent calling for the cops suggests the involvement of the corruption guy rather than a mere  discrimination like the previous examples. It is hard to see that a cop would unnecessarily invoke that discussion of  crime or not crime and direct his attention toward the person like that second cop did if the motive is discrimination. If it involves a violent action or an insult toward the discriminated person then the trade off with the psychological inconvenience of directing the attention toward the latter might be convincing but just for the sake of arguing like that for a cop, it does not seem so. The only explanation that seems to fit good here is that that action was intended to add another layer of protection and service for the corruption guy whom I would hardly expect to have let things go without making a contact to pull the police to his direction after seeing me contacting it regarding the matter if he was involved. The first cop might have not been involved or was also seeking serving this guy but after seeing his level was achieved, he wanted to upgrade to that sought by his comrade. Both scenarios also fit the time order of the events with the second cop arriving less than a minute after the first, because the first cop might have been dispatched before receiving the communication related to serving this corruption guy or that the second cop was sent merely for adding support to that purpose. I have twice before called for the cops to come in this city and in both cases only one cop in one car were sent and it does not seem that they are inclined to send two cops and in separate cars for no reason (The part I mentioned suggesting more than one cop is a special occurrence resulted from me continuing communication and complaining about their own behaviour toward me).    

196

Continuing from the preceding post

Earlier that day I was flipping through TV channels and saw the remainder of a show where two guys were walking through tall grass or the like and had to be careful to avoid rattle snakes and this guy knows what I watch on TV even though I do not have a cable (I have known this for years and some of my reactions should have been enough to suggest that sooner to the corruption guy whenever he is not toying with the world and taking things to his desire playing around). It seems like when I  later went to do my yard it occurred to this guy, and you know that I am accepted like a toy to him according to this modern day slavery by corruption, the desire to make me experience a smaller version of that so he arranged for what I described in the preceding post. 

I have before seen or passed near snakes while mowing the yard but it was connected to the yard being mowed and never looked as artificially created situation like that of yesterday.

I probably also better mention previously seeing what seemed to be this same snake in the middle of the street, also like it was put there, across from that same neighbor and my house as I was coming from shopping in what sounded like another episode of cooperating action with this guy before I started to turn my cell phone off in order to avoid being tracked and enable synchronized action like that. So it seems like this time they decided to bring things closer. 

195

I was going back to my garage to add gas and continue mowing my backyard when I found a snake about 4 feet in length and thickness of about 1/2 to 3/4 inch, inches away from my garage opining. It seems like it was put there by one of the neighbors and probably for this corruption guy using accommodation from a new neighbor that is more dedicated and/or put there for the service of this guy. From the timing (at the moment I was coming back to my garage) and the location (the body of the snake had just or not yet been totally on the paved path from the side of that relatively new neighbor) and the body position of the animal, things fit good with that it was thrown from the side of that new neighbor there just while I am about to return. That is also a good way to avoid a security camera I have in front of my garage. I have other things fitting the big picture that that snake did not come by itself but was thrown there. 

I called the cops on that neighbor whom I think controls the snake and now I want to talk about my experience with cops here in general.
One time in Knoxville, the big city near this one (Lenoir City), I called the cops complaining about a neighbor who repeatedly crosses into the yard of the house where I was living to pull down the trashcan and they argued back against me that I did not have a "no trespass" sign, despite the action I just described. 
Here, one time I called them about how an adjacent neighbor guy parks his car on my side intentionally trying to agitate me despite that there is an ample space on the portion of the street in front of his own home and I got informed that I do not own the street. Later that cop came back to tell me or argue against me using the excuse given to him by that guy which was that he parks on my side in order to avoid his car getting accidentally hit by one of the neighbors across without any support for that claim. The situation ended with this cop threatening or warning me that if something, which I did not hear correctly what, happens again "we gonna have a problem" (or something like that). I have this bad habit of nodding my head without noticing even though I did not understand what was said but that was probably for accusing him of being biased (This story continues but the most interesting part of it was other cops laughing when showing them pictures of other cars that came to park on the side of my home supporting that guy after recognizing that one of those cars belongs to another cop the know).
This time, the first cop who came asked me if I have a proof or I saw that neighbor throwing or putting the snake in my yard and I said no. He then said that he by himself or with the other cop who came by another car probably less than a minute later, will go to ask that neighbor and if that neighbor admits the guilt then it is a crime. After they came back, the second cop came first to me and informed me that that neighbor did not admit throwing any snake. However, despite how I did not show any insistence on them to act for my side without proof or even argue back against the denial of that neighbor, this second cop on his own volunteered telling me that even if they threw a snake into my yard it is not a crime. Then the first cop came back to support this second one as if he himself did not say what he said a few minuets ago, let alone how it can directly be seen wrong. We are not yet dealing with a court and still at the level of cops dealing with the matter and he argued the question of intention and suggested a scenario of someone finding a snake on the street and throwing it away to my yard.

194

Lets make it very clear. This system here is very far from showing itself as honestly tries to equally enforces the law on everybody and gives no privileged treatment to some, or even anywhere close to sufficiently counter indications to the otherwise.  

193

Even without that in the preceding post, being the target of the challenge is by itself a very strong reason to make one assume no responsibility of the actions of its opposing side. 

192

After all the talk I did, I did not want to be seen as always discontent and revolting so I let myself follow others who took me to here like a fish pulled out of its water with a net. Otherwise, I wouldn't go along one inch with this guy making the system and the world here his toy for even a fraction of what was done. It is beyond outrageous, unthinkable, and making one speechless. 

191

I have just spent over 20 minutes just trying to log in to my computer  while it was doing "updating" that felt endless and I do not know how long it would have taken hadn't I turned off the internet. Then I spent an additional 40 minutes to write this. I do not know if this was the result of interference by this guy or that Microsoft may need to be sued for hijacking people's computers like this.

190

Related to post 187, I was focusing on the defensive aspect of my side when I said that I cant, even with the limited domain of only its interface, sufficiently see that absent judge claim against me. Otherwise it is a huge understatement. No one in this guy's place acting seriously to resolve the issue more than toying around and showing off would like to take such a risk of suggesting to the opposing side anywhere close to this a probability that the court and/or its judges are holding themselves in such position for the case of the latter. I continue to struggle in whether this absent judge claim was done for the guy or was the guy required to accept it (still talking at the level of merely its interface).      

189

Again, it seems like this guy wanted to treat me like a toy of his and impose his will on me not merely through being affected by his malicious action but also to the level of forcing me to do some action in order to get rid off that effect. I wanted to log in to my Ameritrade account and after entering the user name and password, this time I got a security question which kept refusing my answer even though I kept entering the correct one. I cannot at this moment answer if that game was played with the help of Ameritrade or my Internet provider Charter. I had to call to gain back my access to my account and for that I had to close all the windows on which I was working. And if that is not enough, I was made to choose the new security question and answers twice which also sounds like the result of a malicious interference by this guy. 

Do you know how it feels, even for once, having this guy disables your access and treats you like a toy just because he wanted to do that,  let alone the number of times this guy has been doing this to me.

And here it goes more than an entire hour of my time just because this guy felt like not letting me have it.  

188

Several days ago my cell phone with Virgin Mobile was again, turned on while I was out even though it was off which I cant see but, again, as a service to this guy related to how he had been able to track my moves when I used to do that while my cell phone is on. I have had my phone turned off at my home for months without ever seeing it turned on on its own. The call that made me notice that my phone was turned on was a regular one I do not remember it ever turning my phone on while I am at home.     

187

I do not know how could the Supreme Court sees its false absent/replacement judge claim as  appropriate for it to do and not degrading to the system? Also, don't people have the right to know who are the judges in the court they may seek? 

Note that, personally, I cant sufficiently see it against me at its interface let alone from its root purpose. 

186

Aside from the question of morality or my rights, I wonder how many of the others on his side object to this guy regarding his behaviour toward me and say:

Hey, we trampled the whole system for you and you waste all that doing these things? Despite all what we have been doing for you, do you think you are making it easy for that guy to believe it is not you who are in trouble if you target him like this? 

 

185

In the category of his harassment to me everywhere and his refusal to leave me in peace and how agitating that is look also at this example. Recently he has been sending me  notifications from a company called recordsfinder.com when I open my computer (like I did a while ago and as a result pushed away  from what I wanted to do to spending my time writing this instead). The issue here is not just about this apparent level of annoyance and the forcing of his will on me (and the latter applies not just at the level of forcing the thing on me but also at the level of forcing me to take action to get rid of the notification because it does not go away on its own) That is because I previously wanted to use the services of this site and became a paying customer in order to look for something but he prevented me from that and made it useless to me in the most shameless way (To show the level of that I even searched for my own driving record and got the message that my record was not found). So instead of me going  after that, it is he who doubles on that audacity by bringing it again and this time forces his will through it. 

184

In addition to how this guy violates my privacy through knowing what I do on my computers it seems that he could not resist not actually watching videos I have been making and intended for private use.  

183: Modern Slavery

Yesterday I was watching a movie from Netflix when after less than twenty minuets it suddenly went back to the beginning even though it is about two hours in length. I tried again more than once with the fast forward and still every time the movie flips back to the beginning from about that same point. I thought it could be a software problem with the disk I received and turned the disk player off. A little later when I went back to my computer it started over like the way it does after an update and with the added bonus this time of not opining the windows I had. This struck me as something that was made by this guy interrupting my work. Anyway, I went to the netflix site and reported a problem with the movie disk. However, that same issue with my computer was probably a reason why I before taking the disk out from the player, to be returned, I wanted to tray playing it but this time while I have no wi-fi for the disk player to connect to the Internet. When I did that and fast forwarded the movie it continued to the end without any problem as if the earlier issue never occurred. 

So, again, could it be someone other than this guy maliciously violating my right and playing me like I am his toy here? Moreover, specifically about this issue, I had suspected him in the past doing malicious things and for a while I often turned my wi-fi off when I want to play a netflix disk. 

I just want to know why is this guy allowed to treat me like his free boundary less thing to violate its rights? If it were unknown who is behind those things I could see an excuse in not prosecuting them in that there are more important cases but those in the positions of authority know how he is and how much he is probably really violating my rights as I claim but still do nothing and go along with this modern slavery of allowing one citizen with the power and connections to do whatever he wants to the other.Not even disabling a computer of mine to the best I could from accessing the Internet was sufficient to convince him to stay away from violating my privacy at least there. 

I do not care what testing he may allege to others that for which he is doing these things to me and how I could be compensated later for that, I do not accept violating my rights and being made a toy of his, period.  

182

Continuing from the preceding post

Also, aside from everything else, it is not like I was found fantasizing or even submitting an application when I made the offer to this guy so one could think of me as seeking the end result regardless of whom will get burdened in the process. No, it was a reaction challenge directed at the guy from the position to which he pushed me (at least while there is no entity from any other party on his side (including the group of judges at the final court) representing it to me in a negotiation).

181

Continuing from the preceding post:

The system shouldn't be sold or traded of even for one second. The thought that I could be or become more acceptable of that if or because of how it could help in resolving my issue in a way that is more beneficial to me, before or after resolving it, is intolerable to me to the level of disgust.    

180

Related to my situation, I don't know how I left myself and tolerated these beyond belief games and toying of the system which I think history has not seen the like of it anywhere before this. I refuse to accept their continuance even for one more second. I hope that ending these games is not dependent, as if I felt any bad effect on me from them, on resolving my issue.

179

Related to post 177, in case one somehow is unable to see how hard to believe the claim that making that deal with that woman was needed, here is the main defendant expressing it for you. He was heard on the recording "admitting that purchase orders were “fake” and claiming “divine intervention” was the only way to explain how he and co-conspirators had “gotten away with this for so long.”"(LINK)  

So if the fraud was that much hardly hidden without a tip about it, how can we accept the claim for the need to make that deal after the attention was directed to the probability of a fraud there? Having such thing pulled publicly where there is no dictatorship forcing it is huge degradation to democracy. 

Although  what plan could have been behind it does not change how much the need for making that deal is hard to believe, this still can fit with the plan theory suggested in the preceding posts. It could have been intended to defend against that they were supported or tolerated by the big guys or law enforcement despite knowing the fraud. This purpose could even have had higher priority than at least part of the one stated for the theory. The admission could also fit the theory in suggesting how much the speaker was bound to come to the authority like that woman except that she went first by herself.

178

Notice that because I am not a law professional, I may look at the intended deception behind the corruption like someone who can see that one chess player is doing some preparation to deceive the other but he (the watcher) may not see correctly how that preparation would be used because he does not sufficiently know how the pieces move. For example, after reading more Federal Criminal Laws, I have a new theory competing with that I put in post 175 about the purpose for the secrecy in imprisonment because of a wittiness protection program, and that it is intended to make the claim of the collaboration of the convict more believable in order to get the sentence reduced.

177

Even aside from what is happening in my situation, this is very far from how a system that is not corrupt should react to a suspicion of corruption. For example, how could it be that any of those, from top to bottom, with authority on the matter is accepted as trusted unless he provide a convincing answer for his position toward the deal with that woman mentioned in preceding posts? One could use such a deal as a corruption test for any official. Anyone who does not feel an urge to question it is either corrupt or, at best, much less effective than what is required for a position of authority.

Again, the claim that a case like that of fake selling, and not even for some kind of intangible things like stock shares instead of physical products, with all the leads it provides, could not be investigated without making that deal, screams outrageousness and suspicion. The outrageousness of that claim is high enough had it been all about investigating connections with companies overseas let alone when it is all about or at least include companies here like Sams Club and Costco. 

176

Related to post 174, HERE is what I was referring to when I spoke about one of the defendants claiming that "he came with that woman but was not allowed to make the same deal or something like that". 

175

Related to THIS, Did anyone at the top care enough about the system to check if this guy is really in prison? Did the President do that? Did Congress make an authorization for an entity that enabled a confirming checking on that with a surprised visit that does not give the FBI the time to arrange things to hide the truth? Actually, the potential for such a check needs to always exist and not to be a one time thing.  Even assuming such a reason for prison location secrecy is convincing, the whole Mafia thing (LINK) sounds like something that was superimposed later on the other facts. I do not even need to argue here for the probability of big guys pulling things from behind the scene for this guy because the guy himself may have that power through his involvement in the field of law. You think that with the status he reached there, and as corrupt as he was, it is not probable he found a path to play such a game?

People, democracy gives the system back to you. You need to own it. You cannot leave it like a lonely orphan.  

       

174

Which one of those two, the case mentioned in the preceding posts, or Zimmerman's is more deserving for a best picture award? The dramatic effect of the scene when the judge and the defense team where supposedly involved in a heated argument in Zimmerman's seems to be more than countered by that of showing a Jewish person jump the ship then go back to secretly record the rest for incriminating them (Even though this theory occurred to me later, I want to point out that my focus in post 168 was on the issue of deference in treatment with others having the same guilt or accusation in general. Seeing the different treatment or the effort to have different treatment was extended to all of the defendants in this case does not take away the support of the case to the existence of that difference in general. My focus was not on the issue of betrayal or loyalty among the same group of defendants in a case. Notice how I spoke about "everybody else in similar situation" not "everybody else in the same situation". Assuming the same level of guilt in violating the law for that woman, I would have written exactly the same had the case involved only her). 

However, against the theory that showing was at least partly intended for that effect by the hardly seems not a corrupt deal with that woman anyway, I found today that one of the other defendants said something insinuating him being of "the Jewish faith"(LINK). But if we take when a defendant pleads guilty as the same date or after when a plea agreement was signed then THIS shows that that insinuation happened after making his PLEA AGREEMENT, which included agreeing on no more than 20 years sentence, and by a period that is also lengthy enough to see the reaction (or its absence) and consider adjustments or taking more advantage of the situation, assuming that was not also part of the original plan to begin with. Then it was also countered by the judge supposedly giving the defendant credit for "his assistance" in the actual sentencing which was the reason for slashing off close to half of that 20 maximum. So, you can consider that as being done as an additional support for the purpose which could have been encouraged and/or called for by how the law enforcement found it easy to pass this and the deal with that woman earlier.  

Until now, what I have found are only two camps, the camp of Jewish or supposedly Jewish persons who supposedly helped the investigation, and the camp of others, related to whom I found no suggestion or allegation for being Jewish, who supposedly gave no worthy of mentioning assistance to the government. So, one camp gets the benefit of being seen supposedly assisting the investigation while the other gets the benefit of the sympathy of supposedly being betrayed by Jewish accomplices. Of course, the main defendant, being in the most difficult position, could be allowed to extend showing being betrayed even to the none Jewish defendants but that does not contradict the theory suggested above, because of the capability of the later group to in turn transfer that complaining using the separation of those two camps  mentioned above.

It seems like there are other things also in support of this dramatic intention. One thing of the kind I read today is how one of the none Jewish defendants claims he came with that woman but was not allowed to make the same deal or something like that.

In addition to that, I read today what made me also pay attention to how recording a defendant could be good for the defendant especially if he knows being recorded. It fits with how much that case seems to offer leads, that the defendant here would lose nothing by admitting on a recording guilt that can be easily proved by those leads but would still gain the good of the appearance of making something like regret statements supposedly before knowing he is being prosecuted or investigated. An additional benefit for this here is that it can be combined with the process above to make a case for how the other person seems to be also regretting his actions like the recording person except that the latter jumped the ship to get the better deal.    

By the way, look at this GOVERNMENT POSITION BRIEF for the sentencing of that woman. Does it really add any explanation of value? You again have to take the government at its word for why cooperation of that defendant beyond the initial tip was needed despite how much the case suggests no shortage of leads. And what about all those hardly seen as other than being exaggerated descriptions for the value of that cooperation? How far the government was from saying that cooperation was the best thing since the sliced bread (Although personally I think calling much of the "bread" of the west as bread is akin to perjury)?

I also wonder if instead of sentencing that woman to one year and one day the judge would have even better suggested himself as none participant in a corruption by showing precision good enough to make that sentence something like: one year, one day, three hours, forty six minuets, and twenty seven  Seconds.   

173

Continuing from the preceding post

Whether the deal (including sentencing) with that woman was really intended just for her or part of a plan to encourage privileged treatment to the rest of the defendants because the Jewish defendant was treated that way (instead of doing corrupt deals with everybody), I would not allow a corrupt law enforcement to make me start from that deal as a reality instead of starting from the real root of the matter.

People here are unbelievable. It is like they have dead nerves when it comes to corruption. If you do not act preemptively against corruption at least react appropriately when the stink of corruption reaches you.    

172

Continuing from the preceding post

So in addition to the unexplainable deal, we should add this case to those where investigation stops as soon as it reaches the doorsteps of the big guys? 

Back to the deal itself, if I were a Congress Member I would call on bringing that United States District Attorney to ask him to convince me how or why with that much amount of data they needed the service of that woman to convict those who were convicted? It is hard to think of a case offering more potential leads than that. I also would question the action of the judge for at least impeachment and removal from the bench.

Notice that if one were to ask those questions close to when that deal or sentencing happened he could have been asked how do you know it is not being investigated? But we are now more than 7 years from that time, were you provided with any explanation why such a hardly seen as needed deal was made and the low sentencing that followed? Another sign for how much applying the benefit of the doubt here is exaggerated at the expense of making the respectable use of the freedom of speech.   

Another potential sign for the corruption here is how the American Greed Show mentioned that the deal with that woman was that she should not be sentenced for more than 5 years then the sentence came for one year. If that one year sentence was only the choice of the judge from the range of that 5 year deal, this suggests an effort to spread the load of the outrageous appearance of the verdict. 

171

Continuing from the preceding post:

How long do you think that if you were making false statements about selling products to the like of Sams Club and Costco for those companies to notice especially if the company you run is prominent enough to be the owner of things like an airline and the company Polaroid? If they knew what prevented them from pointing that out? Actually how much would you be ready to take the risk of making such false claims on companies like this here instead of those overseas to begin with? So as you see, the deal with the law enforcement was not the first thing suggesting privileged connections. 
As for how she is supposed to pay part of the money owed, if government officials are willing to do that prison sentence deal publicly God knows what they are willing to do there. In fact I need something to install faith in me that the alleged selling of her already owned assets to compensate victims of the scam really happened and was not money laundering by the government.     

170

Continuing from the preceding post:

It would have appeared worth it (assuming you do not oppose such deals in principle) if the recordings were for, for example, those at Sam Club or Costco accepting false claims of sales to them being made. Otherwise, for sellers or launderers with fake selling of tangible products or money laundering that continued this long at this magnitude with this number of the transactions and participants (including alleged participants) in this country, sorry the government officials were not even close to showing a real need for anything from that woman except for the initial tip if investigation did not start before that. 

169

What a wasting of democracy and freedom of speech to have something like that to which the preceding post referred passes publicly like there is no problem there. You don't need to make any association or reference to any group like I did. Instead, you could say: I do not care to whom this was applied, I cant see other than corruption as being behind making that deal.  

168

While watching the American Greed episode show related to the fraud in THIS story I told myself here seems to be a Jew or Jewish person strongly associated with that huge fraud lets see if she gets the level of punishment at the same standard like everybody else in similar situation.  Does the punishment mentioned in that article seems sufficient to fit the actions described in the fifth paragraph of that same article? Does not the whole story of her collaboration with the FBI sound smelly? Also was her secretly recording conversations really needed to convict anyone? Actually I haven't read yet that those recordings were used in the trail of anyone other than the CEO who, anyway, most probably would not have made a reasonable doubt against his conviction claiming that he did not know he was not really making sales. It is hard to avoid the impression that she had a special backing that helped in making that deal and probably also without her dependence on that backing she wouldn't have participated in the scam to begin with.         

167

Recently I have been trying to convince myself that this guy is not invading my privacy with viruses spying on me in my computers, given how he sees everything I do over the Internet. Moreover, he got cockroaches who put their attention and listen from their place to everything in my home like an ultrasound machine and probably beyond what a normal person may think he can do even if his life depends on it. I thought that given such absence of need plus this level of already fulfilled intrusion on my privacy why would he risk making a clear law violation like the one mentioned above? But apparently all those reasons were not enough to make him make a consideration for the law and abstain from invading the rest of my privacy with that. 

166

I have been wondering about it and now I am at the level of suspecting it and it is that this guy puts software to spy on my activity and send him information about that even at computer(s) I do not use for the internet and have chosen to disabled its wireless driver from Windows Control Panel. 

165

Although personally I cant be at easier position, I feel like being on the other side of the galaxy from that of choosing to allow this corruption guy to have his way with the system and the world like this. However, believe it or not, I have been postponing thinking about what adjustment may be required to my passive position in that regard since the time I filed my second case to the final court. Yes, I am a huge procrastinator. But in the mean time shouldn't somebody at least keep a score on this guy? What is it now? A million to zero? Or is it that this guy is allowed to lower those things like that without at least his failures being counted on him? Or is it that how much persons like this present themselves in playful or partial self engaging attitude takes some away  from realizing what is happening?      

164

And again this rat paused what was running on my computer from his place requiring me to press the run button. Some days ago it happened with the youtube site and I ignored it. Imagine, you in your home and somebody not only invades your privacy but also forces his will on you.     

163

I wonder how much those playing those games of  pretending or false claims and news have done their homework that there is no standing against them to be sued for those games? Or is it that they do not care about this because it is not their responsibility to deal with such consequences of their actions?    

162

Continuing from the preceding post:

It seems like I was wrong in the part of the preceding post regarding this rat being behind this latest change according to this explanation I received from UPS less than two hours ago:

"We did receive a request from the shipper to have the package sent back to them. However, this will be completed until the package reaches the destination center that was meant to complete the delivery as originally projected. Once the package reaches this destination, it will be processed and sorted back to the shipper."

However, the rest of the post is far from being damaged without the above.

161

Continuing from the preceding post

You think his toying with me ended there? Yesterday I bought a replacement item only to have the UPS notifying me of scheduled delivery of the earlier one for tomorrow after they themselves mentioned that it would be returned to sender. Here is a LINK to UPS Tracking showing that (original image captured at 75 percent size to make it fit). How often do you see UPS tracking contradicting itself like this? 

This is all have documented proof from the communication with the seller who came two days later to follow on a cancellation request that was reversed by another request within less than 20 minutes to, in addition to the link above, the email I received from  UPS for this intended delivery. 

Like I said before, aside from other things, I anticipate this guy may make my life difficult every time I need to be in contact with the outside. All this uncalled for consequences which are not even on the easier side of anybody except satisfying the whims of this rat followed from a simple order I made. 

In addition here he came after seeing me reading the shipment information I received as an assurance that my cancellation request did not change things, to flex his muscles and act like a God showing how things do not end or are not guaranteed unless he allows that, which was something I thought he may do. Although the rat often acts as if he can contain my thinking and do things that affect me psychologically toward that issue at the court, he cannot even hide playing this game (on himself before me) from me let alone affecting me with it. Even if he succeeds in hiding that, what I keep complaining about in his actions toward me is the direct effect on me not the signs implied in that toward my case with the court. But look at the level of defeat here. He got all that which is going on for him outside but still revert to what annoys and affects me at this level of interaction.

In addition to the time I lost earlier I lost several hours today dealing with the issue of that order which killed the day for me. This brings us to the issue of how he may pretend to others that he is doing things to save me time as if it is totally a different person not him who causes all that losing of time because of those things he does to me directly. This also connects with what I mentioned earlier about how he positions himself like God closing doors sought by others while replacing them with his own.

By the way, I also anticipated that he may bring the earlier order back after seeing me involving myself with buying a replacement yesterday.

            

160

Amazing how this may act like a mouse going behind me to mess my things then after disabling my will he may come again to create a path for me placing himself like a God. I placed an order to buy something couple of days ago then mistakenly requested its cancellation a day later but within less than twenty minutes I sent another message reversing that request. This guy, through being empowered to watch everything I do over the Internet seems to have used that incident as an excuse, as weak as that is, to make the seller use that cancellation request that lasted only 20 minuets to cancel my order and send it back from its path through UPS two days later. Then now this guy may offer the item through his own ways cancelling my existence by replacing my will with his . You can only see this mouse-God combination in the behaviour of a psychotic like this.      

159: SOLD SYSTEM?

Aside from the issue of being on the wrong or right path, if how the games of this guy are extremely unreasonable for the declared purpose is being countered by thinking that there might be something on the other side (my side) that would make those games make sense for the purpose then it should be known that the answer to that is not only no but also the addition of another extremely unreasonable behaviour of this guy toward that other side as well. It is like for example even though it is very easy for the average person to lift 10 pounds of weight, you think there could be a special exception with a person that was challenged with that to justify at least a glimpse of reasonable expectations for success while in fact the guy on the other side do not only have the average power to do that but himself a heavy weight lifter as witnessed by the challenger himself.

How did I and this guy cross paths in the market to begin with? Was I the kind of guy who follows charts and trading indicators? Even if I was inclined to do that how can you apply it on the kind of low price stocks I was following? No, we crossed paths because of my view to things there which extends beyond that to include other things, like paying attention to whether the selling of a stock is really seeking the best price or itself chasing the low price. I kept complaining of the latter without anybody caring from the authorities until I decided to make a lemonade from that lemon and crossed a path facing this guy starting from the story of a stock of a medical device company called Viking Systems which I mentioned  before. The point here is that if he struggled against my expanded view way in such environment where you can only see trading numbers how can he expect better results in the direct world  with all its indicators?

So the question here is: Even assuming the situation is not already so because of other reasons,  if this guy is really that far from reasonably expecting success from his games using the system, doesn't that, with the system being treated like a toy in this manner, suggest going along with him there being like selling the system to him?

As much as the target is what he pretended it to be, this guy have zero believe in the success of his games and is merely enjoying his control.

    

  

158

It seems that it takes additional time to reach any Internet site I want to access as if there is an additional layer of processing being done for this corruption guy by my ISP provider (Charter) on every request I send.    

157

The cooperation between this guy and Charter Communications on playing games and frustrating me seems to continue. For example a minute ago I kept pressing a submit button for an order I wanted to make but nothing was going thorough. I left that site and went to another one to buy the same thing. It is not just the frustration and inconvenience what this guy is seeking here. He enjoys preventing and allowing things positioning himself like God. In fact, for some of his interferences with my matters I have never been able to really convince myself with any intention until I reached the latter. He sometimes without any material purpose  interferes through his connections to facilitate  what I already can easily do (except for trying to avoid those same  interferences) through other paths without his help. By making me reach what I want to do through his path, he cancels my will and instead establishes his like that of God. The real purpose is not to enable me but to disable me from doing what I want to do through my own path. Even though it is directed to the opposite side in implementation, the purpose behind this unneeded facilitating is the same as that of disabling me by closing all the doors. That is why the path between facilitating and impeding is much closer in his mind than it is in that of the normal person.       

156

Like it is mentioned before, this guy pushes others to whom I make a business or service contact in the outside, to ignore or even mistreat me. He made State Farm treat me this way for years even though I continued to pay them for my almost always garage sitting, pleasure use only, car auto insurance significantly more than what probably should be for a similar client. So yesterday I decided to switch away. But when I came back to log into my account with this company this guy again played the game of disabling my log in password even though I have used it recently. I had to choose the option for forgetting a password and follow a recovery process hoping that he will not disable me again.

Do you know how it feels having this guy exercising his control over you like this? Why is it that this guy can be enabled with an intentionally deceptive behaviour like this and so often like this without any prosecution? 

And again look at the deceptiveness of maintaining two contradictory processes like this where in one of them he frustrates me like this while in the other he pretends creating all those time saving offers, as if the two has no relation to each other.      

155

Continued from the preceding post:
The guy doubles with building and inserting one delusion inside another instead of just acting on one at a time. He plays games that have no chance to succeed for matters that are in another galaxy away from being cared about to begin with. As if for my issue I feel even a trace of caring toward whether it was that woman or the other guy who won the election. However the confusing of this doubling of delusion was not by itself why I did not point out the joke earlier. I also thought about how letting games already played pass may help in reducing the chance of degrading the system with more later. 
I have been avoiding watching the news for probably over a year now trying to avoid encouraging the encroachment on the rights of others with the fake attack news this guy does in addition to the reason mentioned above.  

154

I  know that I might have waited too long to tell you guys this while you add additional layer of lowering yourself on top of degrading the system following the whims of this psychotic.

Here is what you forgot to bring with you for the story of firing the FBI Director: A new constitution where it is at least less clear that the President, even a fake one, has no power to do that. You could have as well claimed that he fired one of the federal judges including those at the Supreme Court. 

However, this misplaced thinking would have worked much better for that TV show,  Revolution, if you recall that. I was about to laugh watching how in one scene in this country, which supposedly turned into a dictatorship, people were still referred to what law mention the forbidding of something when told that something is not allowed. I don't remember from the dictatorship in which I lived before here even thinking about any use for knowing what I was told to do or not to do by the government is required according to what law. It is all about who is giving you those orders. 

153

Walmart on the other hand, seems to have given the best protection to this guy that its parking lot security cameras will not be used to provide evidence against him when he, through his guys, does his breaking and entering to my car.

152

Continuing from the preceding post:

Later I thought that if google is really participating in this then the same result would probably appear if I put different words searching for the same thing. I did and got the correct time with different searches. However, contrary to what I expected, it was not the change in search words from "time" to, for example, "clock" or "date" that led to the correct time. Instead, I got the correct time when I specified my location with the search. A little later I thought of probable explanation. It seems that when you ask a search engine to know the current time specifying a location then it would search its own info to find the answer. On the other hand, if you just request the current time then the search engine may have no info to use to find the current time for you. Therefore to fulfill such request the search engine may send this request all the way back to the ISP and get the time from it.

As you can see, with this explanation, google may not be participating in this game even though all the search results are coming from it. On the other hand the sewage called Virgin Mobile and Charter Communications seems to be playing this game even though, contrary to what I thought earlier, not through intercepting the search I send.            

151

To show to what degree this ridiculous situation of this guy positioning himself as a God and others submitting to his desires has reached, consider this. Because I usually set my clocks advanced in time, yesterday I used my sell phone to get accurate time. Today, time is being reported to me directly on my cell phone with Virgin Mobile and when I do a Google search on both my cell phone and my laptop on the word "time" as Central Day Light Saving Time  (CDT) even though I am in the Eastern Day Light Saving Time (EDT) Zone. HERE is a link to snapshot for the Google search on my laptop.

This directly apparent action of Virgin Mobile also supports the conclusion I made previously that they might have intercepted my search and replaced the results in some earlier situation(s).

I do not know what to do to google, assuming that search really went through its servers, in response to this, given how much they probably resisted this guy from blocking me from using their Blogger and Drive service.    

As for the other guys, Virgin Mobile, and Charter Communications if it intercepted my google search on my laptop,  to whom even being a paying customer still did not prevent them from doing this, they may face what they did here in court.   

    

150

The sewage called youtube now insists on showing me adds without the escape after five seconds option which feels like another thing in service of this rat that never leaves me in peace. 

Buy the way, isn't this sewage owned by google? So how could it be that recently, less than a year ago, I tried to access it on my google tv and received the message that the device is not licensed for that? Google does not licence it for its own device?  

149

A sample of how this rat messes and disrupts my things everywhere is what happened just a little while ago in how just after I finished entering my order and clicked on the submit button on one of his sewage sites called net32.com I received a message telling me that the site is busy updating its dental (the type of product I was buying) products. It felt one of his creation fake sites from the beginning but the problem is that you are trapped without confirmation for your order nor can you cancel it.

Imagine living with this rat using his connections everywhere to mess your things and make your life difficult. And it is not like you can hide things from him. Internet, phone calls, credit card transactions, everything is revealed to him and in as much as real time as he wants. Even a place in a city over 160 miles away where I go to buy halal meat, he did not leave for me without messing things there and now I have to grind my own meat and that in addition to the unpleasant behavior I started to see there (and just in case the rat thinks otherwise because I am writing about this now, he should know that I detected that from years ago). Wherever, I want to go he interferes causing strange and unusual behavoiur or totally impeding me.        

148

The sewage called Youtube is giving this corruption rat..sorry.. big corruption rat a pass on even interrupting a video I am watching with a commercial even though there was no sign it contains any. 

By the way, I can find what I look for elsewhere in the internet but I use that site because there is at least a path for those who want to complain for their copy rights here. That is especially true for materials from where I came from.   

147

This rat continues not to leave me without messing my things. You turn your head away from one thing, you get another. About a week ago I ordered six rolls of the kind of paper needed for the petition to the court from, apparently another group of corruption mice, a site called Lexjet.com. I ordered six and my credit card was charged for six but with an unexplainable corruption audacity they delivered me only one. Even if this was a partial delivery, they did not tell me that when I contacted them about the order and gave me the tracking number neither there is anything to indicate that on the package I received. 

With the earlier petition, the UPS guy refused to deliver the papers until I myself went to the UPS center and brought them.   

Writing this made me lose about an hour of time.   

146

continuing from the preceding post:
Electricity was brought back yesterday at about 8 pm adding another sign that the power outage was arranged with this corruption rat, . But then Charter's little mice started their turn in serving the master rat and I did not get to the internet service from them until a few minuets ago.

145

Continuing from the preceding post
There is even less excuse and the situation looks manufactured and wanted to continue even more than the previous episode. The weather situation lasted only minutes and was not that significant and this day has been good from the beginning but we continue to have no electricity because the electric company is serving its master, the corruption rat. I have never been in power outage that looked as intentional in its continuity, let alone how it started especially with the current one, than it is with those two episodes. Of course later in the news made for the rat there could be, like the previous situation, stories about other places that stayed longer with the power outage as if even if one wants to ignore the special things of this situation, the corruption rat has kept any value to the news media
around us to be trusted after all what he had used it for.

144

I have been without electricity since 10:30 pm Eastern Time yesterday courtesy of this corruption rat and the mice of the electric company repeating the same game on me they played couple of years ago. I am posting from my cell phone.

143

Why is it okay for this guy to do all the fraud he does in the market? Would it be strange to see an ordinary person gets prosecuted for even just one of the ordinary fraud actions of this guy? Or is it that the law is only applicable there? In addition to his actions with the trading of stocks, he even creates fake corporations or assign fake leaderships to those he controls pretending being a separate entity while he pulls the strings inside. How is it that all of that is okay? (Also imagine how he tries to pull a fake president for the country while his fake CEO show for the stock I mentioned in the preceding posts about the Ask price being lower than the Bid, has been to me like one of those children shows where you can see the strings moving the dummies, despite how the environment there allows for much stronger isolation).

142

Upon reflecting on my situation, I am not sure that being on the other side allows me to throw the responsibility of the actions I see as bad to the system on the side doing those actions without myself being a participant. The integrity of the system should always be at the best it can be and never sacrificed even for one second. Even just reasonably, as much as the reason was the integrity of the system to begin with, what has been happening here does not make sense. Should we just close our eyes now then start over when things are over?  

My desire to show how much I am not affected by what have been going on has led me to be light years away from my natural behaviour here. However, I now realize how I missed seeing that as tolerating what is going on for material benefit could even make more sense as accusation. Therefore I tell all those doing those things to the system that if you think that I am willing to trade-off even a tiny bit of what you are doing for such a gain then you are in different universe from where I am. So if that is out of the picture then why are you doing what you are doing? Shouldn't you at least check to see if it is the only available path first? Why do you let a psycho have his way suggesting to you that somehow you can create a fake behaviour for the system showing corruption while inside he maintains a satisfaction in that the behaviour of the system is the system?

I know that I could have confused things, especially toward the court, speaking from an external point of view without sufficiently emphasizing the internal one but I intend to no longer even blink from seeing myself as part of the system.   

    

141

Related to post 139, look how beautiful it is that he continues to show an Ask lower than a Bid price on the streaming quotes. The situation of this country with corruption, if describe sufficiently, can very easily serve as vomiting inducing medicine for so many people living under dictatorships because they cant harness the military power enslaving them.

Like I mentioned before, I have seen this guy manipulate stock volume in fake buying and selling to himself to make a volume of over 30 million shares in the first hour or half of the day for a stock that hardly trades and I wrote about that to that swamp of corruption called the Securities and Exchange Commission and it still went like nothing as did other things I wrote to it (but they were fantastic at revealing my name and email to this guy fast from the first time I trusted them on that in 2006). While that was less probable than what you may see on a Bugs Bunny Cartoon, at least it is theoretically possible. But here how is it even possible to have the Ask stays lower than the Bid price? This like seeing water in the higher place not flowing to the lower place despite not being held by anything. The only thing that could stop the buying where there is an ask lower than the bid would be if the seller attaches an All Or Nothing condition (sell all of the shares or do not sell anything) to his broker and I have done that with my asks to sell shares before and have seen that doing so would prevent the ask I put from being displayed as the Ask even though it was for the lowest price.     

140

Every now and then, this corruption rat disables my internet connection then enables it imposing his will and control on when I do not get impeded from doing what I want to do and instead waste my time trying to solve this new situation he imposed on me.  
And with writing just the above he caused me to have 40 minutes of additional wasted time on him and believe it or not he seems to have imposed his will again forcing me to leave posting here temporarily in order to prevent Windows form shutting down my system for an update its time was mysteriously changed from much later I set a little while ago during another interruption for the same update. Even with this Windows update it seems he is involved in using it to frustrate me. Couple of days earlier I opened my computer to do a short task and this same Windows update message came. So I thought it is a good time to proceed with the update now instead of interrupting me later but, again, believe it or not, after I agreed to the update message and even closed for that purpose all open Windows the update did not continue but instead displayed a strange message telling me that they will "take it from here" then went away then came back later and did the interruptions I just mentioned.         

139

Got enough corruption and this guy treating everything like a joke?

Take a look at this SNAPSHOT here for Scottrade trading platform. Look at how the symbol "CTDH", a stock he is playing, has an "ASK" lower than the "Bid". In case these terms need explanation, the "Bid" is the highest price offered for buying shares of the stock while the "Ask" is the lowest price accepted for selling shares. So you can see that an "Ask" lower than the "Bid" situation is impossible to happen. Yet, this has been shown like this here for days and continues even despite reporting it, which, astonishingly enough, brought out arguments trying to justify seeing such situation as a real occurrence.     

138

continuing from the preceding post

That of course comes on top of the absence of my privacy to him through all those things which he still had to supplement with absence of my physical privacy where I live. 

137

This rat, with his allowed access to everything I do over the internet in addition to phone (tracking and calls) and credit cards transactions revealed to him in real-time, already has enough empowerment to practice his joy of positioning himself like God to me or making me his toy. So there is certainly no need to add to that things through the government like him pulling me to jury service on his whim or even worse make the mail refuse to pick a package it was required to pick from me and, still worse, allowed to break and enter into my car repeatedly without any prosecution. Even aside from messing or controlling government related things, while other legislators might think about limiting or regulating how the power this guy has can be used, this guy was allowed here to frustrate me with actions as illegal as preventing me from accessing what I want to access many times over the internet in addition to the phone by taking my input to somewhere else.   

136

I tried to see more probability in that the jury service thing may have not been pulled by this guy given that I have been living in significantly smaller population county for over 5 years but going there made me see enough to make me think it is the work of this guy even had this been about an everyday life thing.      

135

Continuing from the preceding post

He positions himself so that all my communication needs with the outside world to get something done (and how could that be hidden from him given his access to my communication means?) should go through him. He prevents me then he allows me. He is the one who closes and opens the doors for me.

134

One reason I made post 131 was to give an example of how much a guy like this could behave far from what one could expect from seeing how he fits himself with what suggests otherwise elsewhere. While he shows trying to accommodate me with something, he comes from everywhere else to miss or make things more difficult for me or even just to position himself like a God to me allowing me to do things only through the paths he chooses for me (This latter thing reminded me of his externalizing me in my court case so that he can position himself like God toward me in having his behavior above being seen mandated by other things. Even his accommodating attempts in that thing, supposedly directed from behind the scene to me, made me laugh when they brought to my mind the similarity of a major psychotic behavior to which I was subjected, or subjugated, in the main story of my life and saw the shared tendency of trying to defeat reality with abnormal substitutes in order to position the self as God ).       

133

All this non reluctance, actually enjoyment, to put himself above the law and how much others submit to him without caring about the legal consequences, is not a good reason to do a thorough investigation on the actions of this guy and his boss? But who would do that? The same people his boss push to the government power seats?

Where I came from, when I was a child, hearing comments during American movies about how it is for sure that some guy in the movie is the bad guy but he could not be touched because of lack of evidence felt very unconvincing to me for reality situations. After living in this country this long and seen what I have seen, from the joke called the Securities and Exchange Commission to the rest of the government in recent years, I began to recognize how much I could have been right then. It seems very probable now to me that the reason this country lived that organized crime gang period had much more to do with corruption in the government than it is generally thought and that was replaced by this which is much less sever in comparison but also cannot be seen not involving the much higher levels in the government.      

132

Still, what is in the preceding post, even if considered in the same domain, it does not come close to that of crossing the line of breaking  and entering into my car, and not even once but repeatedly. Or, next to that, it does not even come close to when he makes my internet service provider or the phone company prevent me from accessing some place directly or by diverting my input to that destination from reaching it or replacing it with a different one in order to make it lead to error like in the situations I talked about here. Just a little while ago, I had a website where my input took no effect and I started to wonder if it was also one of those situations.  Imagine living with this guy having the power over you to prevent you from accessing things whenever he wants and freely from any prosecution like this. Sometimes, when I look at how people are forced to submit to the law on that cops show, the severe contrast with the immunity given to this guy makes me wonder: Is this the same country?

By the way, even for a common issue like paying taxes, what is in the behaviour of those in the government toward this guy which can keep the faith that this guy and his boss are held to pay their taxes like the rest of the people?          

131

Imagine having whatever you do over the internet watched by this guy and him using that position to mess things for you. So if the absence of privacy is not enough you have also to suffer through how much a conspiracy rat like this would not resist going behind the scene and doing its thing. And with the power he has to take others to his side, imagine what that could cause. What may take another person five minuets to order over the internet, could take me well over an hour sifting through things trying to avoid him coming from everywhere. Recently he has been working on frustrating my effort to have a lawn mowing service. In addition to conspiring with some contractors themselves he seemed to have used a shorter way for doing that through the Homeadviser.com which I was using, and making it play games for him while pretending to be honestly doing its work. Contractors who were in a very short list provided by the website were not showing up after setting the appointments through that website itself. I also tried to use the service of a website called Taskeasy.com, which comes on the top of a google search for a mowing service and it looks like that he has made them back off not just from agreeing on an estimate but, also from proceeding beyond that to take my credit card number for payment. When providing the estimate, which I got from that website twice with weeks of separating period and was the same, the website just took my address and calculated the size of the mowing area on its own. But the conspiracy rat saw me searching the internet trying to figure out why that number was smaller than the size of my lawn on paper (Although I later saw, through the google's satellite picture and comparing the size of the built portion of my lawn to the rest, how much the size calculated by the website itself seems closer to the correct size for what is usually mowed of my lawn than the one on paper) so he apparently used that to provide them with an excuse to shamelessly reprice and back off, not conditionally but totally. He then, after arguing through emails, probably taught them the same thing, which he apparently think of as a magic trick to stop me, to use the phone as a communication medium like he taught the local USPS guy who was supposedly answering my complaint for the intentionally unpicked package (POST 77), to insist on the same thing.  

Last year, I had to tolorate the behaviour of the guy he sent me, which I recognized from the first moment that guy came, through the homeadvisor site which I tried to use for the same service (Although I think, or at least do not have what suggests otherwise, back then that was only based on his watching what I do and not with participation by the website itself).