284

Actually, related to the preceding post, even assuming the deal I criticized in that case was surely not needed, I do not know that the entity I criticized has the final authority for making such deals. 

283: Correction

 I insisted on criticizing the handling of that case about the guy whose company claimed false sales to Walmart and Costco, by the FBI, and the silence of congress on that handling, because I ignored the possibility that if the CEO claims not knowing these things it could be seen as casting reasonable doubt. But at least based on some other case I watched on TV, it seems I shouldn't have taken such a position.   

282: Epstein vs. Zimmerman

 Who wins for maximum return on effort, Epstein with his bearded look for suicidal depression or Zimmerman with his injuries for killing another person as self defense? 

And by the way, aside from other things about Zimmerman's case, why should the injuries of Zimmerman be seen as  justifying a self defense claim but the fear of a teenager who finds himself suddenly being approached by an adult and the teenager reacts by running away then gets chased by that adult should not be? If the answer is that that fear could have also supplied justification for a self defense claim then what if the killing had happened the other way around? Should we not care about that and just rule in favor of the survivor like a jungle?   

281: Corruption And Congress

 Believe it or not it seems that the charges brought against Epstein were Federal charges. So this extremely suspicious situation of acting as if the claim that he died in prison did not sound like made up show belongs proudly to the head of our government here. On the other hand they broke the record of the shortest silence time with the two trillions they authorized at the beginning of this corona virus exaggeration scam. The speed with which that was done makes it hard to avoid thinking that it was not done for the people but to make things run smoothly for the scam. And it does not even appear that they gave close to that  level of decisiveness and actionable care with regard to this matter throughout the preceding time. So which path is more believable, the one suggesting sudden change or the one providing better connection by suggesting a planned thing?

   

280: Zero Calories Same As 1/3.2 The Calories?- 2

 I wonder if the other side may argue that using the product as a substitute to table sugar is itself what fits the "amount customarily consumed" regardless of what uses exist for the level of sweetness provided by that amount.  

But again the most important thing is for the FDA and other agencies not to override or disable the common law and language people use, in the information presented from the maker to the consumer, without requiring the signaling there for dependency on their rules.   

279: FDA Got Nothing Better To Do?

Related to the preceding post, even if that rule was made for amounts customarily used in life and were applied correctly, still, why would we need such a rule? How can the customer be better protected here? How good is it to read nutrition information thinking that the maker is responsible for its claims, but then it turns out that the FDA allows different thing without the knowledge of the consumer? I have always wondered about food labeling rules like this one where the common law and language render them completely unnecessary. Regardless, that could still be done with much less harm and betrayal to the consumer if the FDA were to require the maker of the product to mention that such information (like, for example, here, calling the calorie amount, zero calorie, if it is less than 5 calories) is according to an FDA rule if that maker is depending on that rule, instead of communicating to the consumer through a new language known only to the FDA itself and the maker of the product. Otherwise, how can what is going on in such cases be seen but fraud supported by the government?

278: Zero Calories Same As 1/3.2 The Calories?

Apparently that is what the math of Splenda sucralose packet sweeteners and/or the math of the FDA says. Take a look at the "Energy (caloric) content" section of this Wikipedia Page on Splenda. What does "amount customarily used" mean? If it is something the maker of the product sets on its own, then one can also take table sugar itself and market it in packets as zero calorie sweetener. Otherwise, in what customarily uses one packet of Splenda gives the needed sweetness? So what is going on here? How can a product be marketed as having zero calorie content when it in facts has close to one third the calories? Is this corruption at the rule making or at the lack of enforcing that rule level? Or both? 

277

 Not wearing a face mask here, and if I were with the authority, I could have invaded Florida for that fake court which supposedly tried Zimmerman for killing Trayvon Martin. The system is so corrupt that, Zimmerman, because of the strength of the corruption force backing him, appeared so far from being really concerned about what was going on to the level of probably struggling to keep a serious face.

276

 Still proudly never wore face mask and fighting that corruption.  

275: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 14: Again The Response Looks Missing The Target

Even though there maybe a significant amount of questioning for how this virus was called as the cause of death for many of the situations that involved pre existing conditions, still if there is one thing that may answer the question in the preceding post it is that pre existing condition explanation. However, the response that is supposed to be because of this virus is again wasting energy and imposing restrictions on the general public to whom infection for the vast majority would most probably be like a passing flu. On the other hand if I were somebody with a related pre existing condition I may appreciate something that enables me to stay far from the probability of infection like a financial support for example but it would not make me alter even a little the precaution I take not to be infected by the outside having even everybody else wears breathing mask.

274: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 13: Counting In That Elephant In The Room

Up to this point my conspiracy talk here did not extend to the data itself that is related to the death count related to this virus. But now I do not see a trust in any reporting out there that is capable of stopping this question:

How could an infection related disease have that many mortality cases in countries like this while not affecting even close to that many other places where infection has much bigger opportunity to spread? Look at the statistics about other countries. If this virus kills that many here with this level of cleanliness in the public environment and interactions among people, how many it would have killed at places like where I came from and other places that are even not as good as the latter in those qualities? Isn't this a joke? Like how all the consumption here for butter and saturated fat makes sense for things like heart disease and stroke to be more common here, it should be the other way around with infections. Nothing can explain this except a game and conspiracy being played at some selected countries.

    

273: Suffocating The People

The corruption of this corona virus exaggeration scam is at the dirty level of even chasing people on their basic necessities like groceries. Yesterday, I saw a TV short news about a woman throwing stuff out of her cart in a grocery store because she was told to put on a mask. While she has no right to do that, the stronger feeling related to the story for me was about how much she seems to be  frustrated for being chased with this nonsense to be forced against her will while all what she wants to do is just to buy food necessity.

She did not just dump her cart but instead was throwing items individually as if trying to counter a feeling that she needs to buy that thing for each of them.

272: The Question In Post 271

The answer to the potential for a need to generate new  objections, in the question in the preceding post, could be that objecting to management needs to be done in terms of asking them to do the correct thing related to some issue, rather than in terms of stop doing a wrong thing. This way management will enter the state of unacceptable behaviour after the first objection and will not exit that state until they remove all reasonable doubts related to the matter that gave rise to the initial objection, and therefore no further objections related to more clear wrongs associated with the same matter would be needed.    

It seems that, depending on the type of wrong, there could still be a good purpose to asking management to change even a clear wrong action before filing a lawsuit. That is because a corporation needs a purpose in order for a definition for what is and what is not for its benefit, to exist. That imply that if a corporation is registered as being for profit, for example, then any deviation from that purpose would be a wrong thing even if all shareholders were okay with that deviation. But even though it may be technically required,  it is impossible to follow that purpose to the max. Therefore I should have put my question below in terms of how much a thing is clearly unacceptable to shareholders rather than being just clearly wrong. Because otherwise management can do irreversible damage if allowed to do anything  unless they recieve an objection first.   
Back to the first part above, I might have exaggerated the technicality there. That is because what is needed could be  just to let management know that they need to correct something wrong until it is in an acceptable stage. For management to Know that there is such intention behind the objection it receives may not need a language at a contract making level like it is suggested in the first paragraph above. Nevertheless, it does not seem like a bad idea to take such a precaution. 

271: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 12: Correction To The Preceding Post

I should have noticed the lawsuit option earlier. That is because the only path for that that seems to be readily available argument wise is the derivative path (on behalf of the corporation) and that requires asking management to correct the action, first. Still it is not a bad idea to start doing this now in case they want to continue this closing stores everywhere game for some more time. So based on this I do not see that I can do much with a lawsuit at this time and therefore no longer sure I am going to do so . Also, contrary to what my talk about class actions lawsuits may suggests, any recovery obtained through the derivative path is for the corporation not the shareholders directly. 
On second thought, if a wrong as obvious as this requires asking management to correct their action, before filing a derivative lawsuit, wouldn't that open a potential for an endless process here? They could correct only a fraction of the problem. So, in that case, would correcting that resulted new thing also requires asking management again to correct their action? If no, then wouldn't that be based on that it is an obvious wrong? So why was it required to ask management to correct their action toward that first obvious wrong at the start?    

270: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 11: Big Conspiracy, Bigger Response

That what could happen to those business accomplices if their shareholders sue them for their closing or lowering their businesses without a reason like this, especially department stores. What could be better than suing for your benefit while doing good to the nation by teaching corruption a good lesson? If they want to argue back that they were following executive orders, they should be asked about why then they did not challenge those orders at the courts. But shareholders need to be very careful about what lawyers they select for class actions and even then they may need to very carefully question the actions of those lawyers and research carefully if they are really in their best interest. Then the cases should be followed all the way to the supreme court if needed.
Although anyone can get in a similar position by buying shares of those companies, I still do not feel good toward not using the authority I have here as a shareholder, against this corruption, after all the criticism I did to those in the government who do not stand to corruption despite how this country desperately need that. So although I do not wish to add more things to this kind of my to do list, especially with the special impediment I get from this corruption guy, I think that I am going to file at least one derivative lawsuit against  one nationwide department store. It may not contain much more than telling the court hey look no reasonable person can see this widespread closing to make sense. 

269: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 10: Flipping It Back

I wonder if the participation of businesses in this game and  their conspiracy on their own shareholders by not running, or closing their stores, can be flipped back on them with lawsuits. For example, how can those big chain retail stores that closed their stores everywhere counter the argument that that cannot be seen as being done in good faith for the benefit of their shareholders?      

268: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 9: The Smooth Cooperation

Do you really think that if there were not a big nasty conspiracy behind the scene, there would be this much acceptance to close businesses, by their owners? Are they really that convinced to make such sacrifices because of a reason as weak as this? Because they are ordered to do so?  I think that if this situation were real and many businesses are themselves not part of the conspiracy, you would have seen lawyers representing companies camping overnight at the courts  to object on receiving such orders, especially the big companies. Actually, here for example, not only that I never heard about refusal and enforcement for those orders, I am still not sure we have enforceable orders in that regard to begin with.

267: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 8: I Warned You

For whoever honestly not trying to burden the country and create artificial recession to help the wealthy corrupt have their way with the stock market (Although this aim itself could be a minor thing in comparison with not implementing the targeted protection, pointed out in the preceding post, for the two more vulnerable groups, instead of this mess and wasting of effort and resources while letting that number of deaths occur in those two groups) : I warned you. I told you that although the falsification that is going on around me in relation to my issue with the corruption guy is less than a joke in its effect on me personally, how can you be not worried that similar games could be played with more serious issues? It seems like it did not take long for the result of that encouragement to lead to this unprecedented level of country wide misleading and  fake show.

266: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 7: Choosing The Harder Path

From as soon as it was recognized how it is less likely for this virus to be deadly for other than those with pre existing health conditions and the elderly, why didn't the protection be focussed on this group? We could have pointed out that fact to the public then asked people with preexisting medical conditions to come forward in order to protect themselves. In addition to the less restrictions on the rest and less burden on the economy, those two vulnerable groups could have been better supported financially and that in turn would support the effectiveness of this path of dealing with the issue. 

Nobody was arguing against the quarantine for the infected. So why was there such emphasis on dealing with the issue in terms of not transferring the virus instead of not receiving the virus? Why the clear and stronger path of having one taking care of himself was replaced with the more confusing and weaker path of taking care of others? Why choose what is much more undefined, and more dependant on morality here? Job adds, for example, as much as they can provide an enticing pay, are very far from from showing this self serving information in the background to the public serving, like here. It seems that the harder to implement path was intended here to magnify the problem.  
Even without being sure about that virus related thing, mentioned at the beginning, we should have looked for if there is enough probability to make the path described here our next step instead of jumping directly to or  continuing what we are in now.  

265: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 6: Market Data

Even aside from how a pandemic may have just a transitory effect on the economy, the preceding post should not be taken as accepting the economic data resulted from this artificially affected economy as belonging to the original. It is beyond ridiculous to tell businesses to close and people not to go out unnecessarily, then bring data like the unemployment filing and retail sales as representing the real economy like they do without those directives . So despite how the related news may be presented in a form that suggests a direct link between this corona virus and some economic data, one may need to pay attention to the intermediate link mentioned above. 
By the way, I wonder how many of the business owners or mangers, especially those at the big corporations, are so cool about closing their businesses, because of the relation they have with those who want to affect the stock market with this corona virus thing.       

264: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 5: The Pandemic Underneath

The whole country was hijacked like never before in its history and got its economy legs broken, for no reason except to serve the corrupt forces with the financial power in bringing the effect of the resulted artificial recession to the stock market. 

You people think that with a tyranny system you get a manual that shows you how to judge everything the government does or an alarm that sounds when the action of such government is not really intended to serve the people? Many times a tyranny government justifies oppressing its people with a purpose lacking complete proof for being misapplied, more than the purpose claimed in our current situation here lacks such proof. All what you get left with there is just the sense of not finding what is being done sufficiently reasonable and making much sense, which you cannot afford to ignore.        

263: The Sewage Called Capital One

Look at This on the go corruption of this company. There was nothing different in my login and even if there was I never signed to two step verification with them and even if I have signed for that I do not use this number because it is a landline not a mobile number. This sewage itself does all its communication with me through an email address which is now replaced with a phone number I never use with them and for a process I never chose to begin with. This is something that suddenly appeared from nothing. It is not  the not recognizing the computer verification which I always use for it that same email address to which this sewage itself communicates all things to me which is now not even given as option. This whole message shown in the link is entirely new to me and I have never seen it or even seen the like of it anywhere else before. Because they are excluding my email for their "verification" as if they are my email provider and therefore phones are the next degree in verification. But they made it on the go for this other sewage, the corruption guy, because I just sent email to the company called Phone Power about the shown phone number telling them that I will inform my credit card company about how one cannot delete his credit card information on their website (I wanted to do that after requesting cancellation). So this sewage made the other prepare all this on the go for me in probably less than 2 minutes.

Now I cannot access my account there even if I just want to end any relation with them unless I tolerate them forcing this on me and this sewage forcing his will again and again and again.
Also, if I click that I do not have access to those options they require me to call them.  

Before, this sewage company disabled my card while I am far in a different city but I continued with them trying to give things another try.

I just spent over two or three hours frustrating on merely accessing an account I have for absolutely no lacking on my part. 

262: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 4:The Increasing Death

Trying to see more clearly how much of what is going on is rooted in corruption, yesterday I directed my thinking toward the increasing death of this pandemic here. It really seems to even make some unwise looking protection measures understandable. But later I noticed how I am missing something big here. We did not start looking at these statistics from the start of the spread of the virus. It seems like we were intended not to go through the issue of this disease gradually but instead receive it more like a shock. That connects with why the matter was not brought to the forefront like this earlier and the issue of testing availability and the length of time it takes to reveal the result. Let the disease progress then bring attention to it so that things look more scary. 

According to the world wide "Total Deaths" chart Here one can see how much we started looking at things from when the effect of the virus started to intensify.  

This site here makes comparison between the death rate of this pandemic and that of 2009 starting from the first reported death. It seems like it is trying to make use of the strategy described above. Because according to Wikipedia the first infection for the 2009 pandemic was confirmed in March 28, 2009, while, also according to Wikipedia , with this pandemic, the same happened on  January 20, 2020.   
By the way, one may need to pay attention to the difference between death rate as applied directly to people and the one applied to the infected (Which I think is called Mortality Rate).      

261: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 3: H1N1 Pandemic of 2009

60.8 million cases, 12469 US deaths and 151700-575400 world wide deaths according to estimates Here. Additionally,  according to This , vaccine  was not developed until mid september 2009. So, how many remember even knowing about this at the time, let alone having it brought into focus and making it require stopping businesses and holding people at their homes like this? Maybe because we just had the recession  of 2008 and nobody wanted to bring down a stock market that went like crazy up?

260: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 2: Testing

The situation of testing for this corona virus thing here does not fit the level that exists in this country in science and technology in addition to the resources that seems to be ready to be allocated for this purpose as evidenced by the stimulus bill passed last week. On the other hand it connects nicely with the preceding post and the strategy of keeping the people away from real facts in order to show a big enough monster in that darkness. This article shows how the testing development here was late compared to other parts of the world while This article speaks about the backlog and how long testing results take until revealed in California. The latter added to my connecting the availability of testing with the scaring game that seems to be going on, questioning the time it takes to reveal the result (not just in California but in general) under the same light. However, while it still may not hide the big picture, one needs to pay attention that with regard to the time it takes to reveal the results, it is not one fixed fit with the scaring theory I am making, but depends on the situation. It is about the number of positive compared to negative results in addition to some compromising to avoid suspicion.

It is also interesting how things in the second article suggest

pre planning and arrangement for the results not to be revealed fast. 

259: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy

With regard to the direct intentional level, initially I thought about only what seems to be an attempt to manipulate people with this  corona virus thing through interpretation. But now I feel like seeing that being done at the presentation level and a wide conspiracy. I clearly got enough of that kind and do not need any addition but lets take some steps back and look at our situation with this corona virus thing. Although I did that before, I want to start here with questioning the wisdom of the stay at home advice. Why is staying home the better alternative for protection from this virus? If someone has the virus, would not the probability increase to give it to related people if they all stay home? People get physically close to those related to them much more than they do that with strangers. And regardless of which approach to protection from this virus is better, don't they all share the purpose of preventing people from unnecessarily getting close to other people as practically as possible? So why should the advice here be given at this implementation level?

I started to suspect a no good intention at the root of this talk about staying home when I connected it to how when I searched the internet I could not find any statistic about how many of the number of total cases were infections among relatives or people at the same residence. Actually that connection was preceded by connecting this inability to find that statistic with a CNN news story about how a 38 years old man died from this virus without having pre-existing conditions because in that same story they mentioned that the wife also tested positive for the virus while the daughter still waiting for the test result. Speaking about sample stories, another one came today also from CNN about 70 college students who went to mexico for spring break and how 40 of them returned with corona virus infection. But if statistics have or presented more with that lacking mentioned above, how much one can depend on cases brought as samples here? 

Then look at how when you search for example Google for "coronavirus" you get a statistic on the side from wikipedia

that include only total cases, deaths and "recovered". How often you find news conveyed in the media in this manner. One often finds news stating that for example three people injured in car accident and were taken to hospital and two of them at serious condition. So how about a flu like situation being expressed not in terms of who is in serious condition but in terms of  who " recovered"? Some times one restore normal health after an intense sickness flu but there would still be something like for example a cough that keeps lingering for weeks. On the other hand This site list 95 percent of cases as mild for this corona virus. And in addition look at what This site reports about the common flu that "This season CDC estimates that, as of mid-March, between 29,000 and 59,000 have died due to influenza illnesses". 

All of this suggests intentional effort to install fear  and see this corona virus thing as much bigger than its real size. It seems to be a large scale conspiracy. Thanks to what happen to my own personal situation with another thing, I learned to disregard or consider for the opposite direction, the role of the media to be honest and state the real facts, enough to have no problem in seeing this at this scale. But of course, there could be people unknowingly participating everywhere. 

What could be the reason for such conspiracy. I think it is to negatively affect the financial market in order to gain better ownership of stocks after the economy improved and the stock market moved like this. The DOW moved from less than 9000 in 2009 to over 29500 in February this year. It seems that the economy was so good that big financial guys became in sever need for something to scare people away from the market so they decided to make the best use of this corona virus thing by presenting it as discussed above. Actually, what I mentioned here was preceded by signs I noticed within the financial market itself.    

        

258 Charter Again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Again Charter cut my internet connection and this time I am using it for trade stocks and cannot afford one minute of losing connection not hours like here until this corruption guy allowed me to connect. Again, does not being selectively targeted like this deserve prosecution by the government?

Charter keeps repeating this again and again and again. I never known something similar happening even once for someone else but it is a common occurrence to me. Why is it okay for this to happen to me? Why no body care to prosecute? Because it is not important? Okay you may not be interested in teaching corruption like this a lesson but do not you at least care that I should get internet service like other people? So when will you prosecute or at least tell an entity like this not to do such corrupt things or it will be prosecuted?   

When will you do that? If I go with another internet provider but this corruption guy make them do the same thing, would you prosecute then? Lets see. 
Not only I lost or missed in the market whatever I missed or lost because of this internet cut but it is now hard for me to focus on the work because of being frustrated and feeling like enslaved.

257: FINRA

Some kind of trading stocks may make you designated as a "pattern day trader" and that leads to having some special conditions imposed on your account. I already had some knowledge about the related rule but I still wanted to get more information. So I went to the FIRNA website and after searching for the words "day trader" (without the quotes) I found This. As you see, it says that the action that can lead to have that designation applied on you is if you "buy and sell (or sell and buy)" the same stock at the same day. That seems clear enough and ready to be followed rule from FIRNA website itself,  right? I could have seen it as such had I not already knew that it is not the same for selling and buying a stock as it is for buying and selling a stock. Initially I thought that the rule could have changed. Following the links provided in the article did not help me but doing a search at the SEC site confirmed my understanding. So I came back and wanted to find that support from the FIRNA site and did a search for "day trade" (without the quotes) and found This. Read the "exception" mentioned in the "What is a day trade?" (internal quotes omitted) paragraph. It clearly excludes selling then buying the same stock in the same day if the stock was held overnight. So unless it is for some corrupt reason, who in good faith would write the information in that earlier article and miss pointing out this? One may wonder about doing such a thing even if this missing information is considered an exception but why would buying the stock any other day be the exception to buying the stock on the same trading day, instead of things being the other way around?

What could that corrupt reason be? My guess is that it is for the same reason this whole "pattern day trader" designation was created to begin with. I think that without this rule, day traders may make the work of hedge funds and other big financial institutions on stocks to accumulate them from the hands of individual holders, significantly more difficult. 
I missed this, but actually it seems that with the "exception" mentioned in the second article everything would be covered with the buying then selling order without any need to mention the other way around unless the reference is to short selling and that may make things even more suspicious for being expressed that way. 

Note: The designation could be about the same shares not just the same stock as I described it here.

256: Prison Corona Virus

Just read news about death of a prison inmate after being infected with this corona virus. Had this virus been here earlier, you could have read the same about Epstein.  

255: Bugged Car?

If spying on my computers and tracking everything I do over the internet is not enough, I have a high probability that after I began to carry my cell phone separated from its battery to avoid being tracked through it (I did that with my earlier cell phone. The new one I generally do not carry with me), this corruption guy bugged my car with a tracking device. Furthermore, I think that this tracking device was most probably installed into my car when I took it to a dealer in response to a recall issued by the manufacturer. I think that it is highly probable that I have been tracked everywhere I go for years through this device.

254

Trying early to make correction to a Second Amendment argument I am making and this corruption guy made Charter take away my internet access and I had to wait for the permission of this shit to have my access to arguing on such important issue. And by the way he knew what I wanted to do because I continued late in the night working on this matter and also that it seemed that I had internet access when I turned on my computer until I clicked on my Second Amendment blog

253: Under Corruption Siege

How is it okay to let people unprotected from the level of corruption here like this?  If it is not enough to have no privacy over the internet with all my communications being seen by this guy, he also interfere to mess my actions there. Take what happened to me this day a little while ago for example. I needed to purchase a replacement part for an exercise machine from the Marcy brand so I called the phone number provided on the manual of the machine for this purpose. In the past I contacted this same company to order another broken thing and this guy made them act corruptly enough to send me a thing not completely made and had to wait again for the correct thing. This time from the start, after having my phone call directed where I can make the order, strangely enough there was supposed to be a waiting line of eight callers before me. What a slim chance for  such a thing to happen  the middle of the day to a company in the business of making exercise equipment.  But if this is not enough to suggest this corruption guy behind the things and having fun here, look at how the call ended. I kept waiting, for a total of probably around 20 minuets, with the message telling me to continue to wait for the next available customer service representative and my number on the waiting queue until I became number one.. then guess what? I found myself left with not a representative but the voice mail of a representative.  
Thinking about the legality of my position if I have the time to sue this company for such disrespecting action reminded me to point out that after reaching the voice box I still did not hang up and the call was ended from their side.    

252: What Is Left To Trust?

Although it is less than a joke for its effect on me, I still want to ask how can people here trust being in this system after seeing all this fabrication and falsifying? I think that a feeling of group identity establishment by contrast through this conspiracy maybe making things more enjoyable. But how can one answer the doubts that it can be done in the future against other things?

And what about the media? What is left of the media after seeing that it can all join together like this in acceptance and support of lies and false news, serving one specific entity?

What has been happening here on both of those directions is literally beyond imagination.

251: Charter's Intentional No Internet Access For Me

This is beyond ridiculous. I have contract with Charter but they continue to intentionally take away my internet service whenever they want. One person has been intentionally specifically  targeted by Charter with taking his internet access. How is such a thing not worthy of government enforcement and prosecution? It is clear that neither of the two safety catchers ("as is" and "as available")  mentioned in the contract with Charter covers taking away service targeting only one person like what is happening to me.

What happens if it becomes the general view to companies that they can announce readiness to provide service to the public but still may choose specific persons to play on and violate their contract with? Is not that defrauding to the public in general? If some special exception is being given here then I repeater again that I do not accept or tolerate a bit having my rights disregarded and violated like this.

250: Charter All Along

After posting the theory in post 246 that it was not Charter taking the role of the direct executor for that kind of having no internet access I discovered that I much more probably was wrong, but neglected to post the newer conclusion. The reason behind this change of mind is that I noticed that I missed that while I did not have internet access through wi-fi I did have the wi-fi itself. So the probability of making my router allows internet access through wired connection but not wirelessly is much slimmer than the probability that an ISP can distinguish between different access points coming through the same router and allows one but blocks the other from accessing the internet.    

249: I need permission to use what is my own

Allowed to use my internet access for sometime last night then it did not take long this morning for the problem to reappear.  It is like they grant me or take away permission to use my own internet access.   
Just in case having this guy watching all what I do over the internet and having no privacy is not enough, you have him reacting to that knowledge.

248: Still the same

I still do not have access to the Internet like other people because of this guy and/or Charter (of course the latter does whatever it does for the former but I am referring to the executor here), not any other entity, just in case it is claimed otherwise.

Hey government, leave this guy does whatever he wants without any prosecution even though you know he should be, or even help him, but show your enforcement of the law on the poor and unprivileged with things like tempting other people to do a violation of the law then catch them, creating case from nothing, like in that bait car show, because that is how things work in the septic tank of democratic systems.

247: And now my wired internet access

My home wireless connection to the Internet is still controlled and blocked from the outside and does not work except occasionally and/or with intermittent connection. Furthermore, I have just spent about 40 minuets trying to correct my wired connection to the Internet which stopped working suddenly just when I stopped watching a youtube  video and went to my computer to do something, as if somebody intended it to happen at that point to frustrate me.

Whether it is just this guy or Charter and this guy, unless I am in an isolated country on my own, this should not happen. I should not spend my time like this trying to make one abstain from intentionally providing me with bad service despite its contractual obligation to me and/or fighting against cyber attacks violating my right inside my own home.

Again, I do not accept living with this guy having the permission to do whatever he wants to me like this.

Writing the above took me an additional hour. I had different plan to spend this rest of the day but this rat refused to leave me alone and despite being content with my only wired access to the Internet. But it is not like it did not occur to me earlier how his megalomania might be itching him hard from even a minor thing about showing less control like what the preceding post suggested.

246: Disabling my internet access from the inside?

Now this corruption guy seems to disable my internet access from the inside. When navigating the internet the connection comes and goes on its own and even though my internet phone seems uninterrupted (Although this test may not continue to be available after writing this given how corrupt my internet phone company (Phone Power) is (LINK). I tested this on two computers with different operating systems and the same interruptions continued to happen. While usually the computer display the "no internet connection" message during these intermittent disconnections, after rebooting I got the message "network change was detected" after first interruption following rebooting then the old "no internet connection" message returned with the second interruption. 

Although it is a violation to my rights either way, this looks more as the result of the work of this guy from inside without the participation of corrupt Charter Communications even though it did disconnect me earlier in the day. 

Before this situation, this guy did interrupt and mess my local connection to a wireless hdmi device I have on more than one occasion and also today. This looks like an upgrade or extension to that.

After writing the above, I connected my computer directly to the cable modem and no interruption happened for relatively a long time. Given that those interruptions were far from looking like the result of a malfunctioning router either, this test supports the theory I put above.

Another Update:
I still wanted additional support that the reason  is not a malfunctioning router  on my side. So today, while I was disconnected from the internet I unplugged the modem but kept my router running. Then I connected to my wireless hdmi device I mentioned above, which uses my wi-fi network for communication, and was able to use it without any interruption for hours. This very strongly supports that the cause of the problem is not on my side. I am writing this using wired connection to the modem. 
         

    

245: Similar Story to This Death Allegation

This is the POST I mentioned earlier where I talked about seeing this kind of game before. The guy there was even too polite to burden the jail keepers with cleaning after him and apparently his good manners stopped just short of making him bury himself after committing suicide elsewhere. 

This story would have been probably enough to make me anticipate Epstein death allegation that followed later had I known earlier about what sounds like a building and preparation for this claim with that first suicide attempt claim, but I did not know about that and only knew that there is a case on such a guy a short while before this death claim (I hardly watch any news, trying to avoid participating with the hijacking of the world that is being done for our corruption guy here, even if it is just at the level of just watching).   

244: Epstein Death Allegation

Probability of corruption like this, passed on and tolerated publicly like this, is beyond imagination.

243: "Autopsy Completed on Epstein"

Too bad cannibalism is not condoned so that one could have said "I ate him" and be closer toward preventing checking the truth.

Speaking , in the preceding post, about not changing my view, I do not feel even a bit less, now than I did before, that Zimmerman court in Florida was fake.
Back to this, as if how ridiculously the whole thing sounds like arranged and made are not enough to make one seek real verification, you read about the history of this guy and you wonder how much more and how bigger than this the red flags showing what this guy can pull with the government can be?  Actually, the bigger parts of the picture add up like the parts of this death allegation itself. After exhausting what can be shown to the outside about having  you pull things from the government in one character, it is time to start fresh again with a new one. 

242: Faking The Death of Epstein?

I am not even in-between regarding alleging the death of this guy. I am considerably more on the side of seeing it as false claim, and would be surprised if the claimers really prove it to be true.  
And let me add this. No matter what is being or going to be put out there regarding this, unless I come back to correct myself on this issue it should not be taken even as a possibility that I changed my view. 
The thing could be looking much more believable than this and I would still have sought verification by eyes of a person I really trust and/or DNA analysis by a lab and a person I really trust, if I have the authority to do that. Otherwise, I would not think of myself as being even close to doing the job I am supposed to do and sufficiently caring about the country.
I repeat again that I am not motivated here by how much I want the guy to be punished but by the need to fight corruption especially when it reaches the level of in your eye under the sun corruption while it looks like everybody walks around like there is nothing there.

241: Alleged Death of Epstein

Did a sufficiently trusted entity see the guy dead? I mean really trusted not some officials given the benefit of the doubt. I do not have any special access and was not searching records or even looking for suspicious stories but still within a short period of watching stories of this kind that were selected to be shown on TV to convey good actions of the system to begin with, not how they looked to me, I noticed several suspicious stories that included one about what sounded also like fabricating death of another well connected man and I wrote about it here. I may one day trace my posts here back to it.  It was one of those stories I posted starting from that amazing story about the FBI making a deal with somebody in order to catch a person accused of falsely alleging selling things to Walmart and Costco. 

My knowledge about the story of this guy is at the headline level, at best, but I am amazed at how much a suspicious system like this is blindly trusted. I searched for more details about this death news trying to find what makes me closer to believe it and instead things sounded even more suspicious to me.

240: Let Me Set This Clear Again

Having to stay on my situation with the court does not bother me a bit in itself. However other than that I do not accept a bit of violation to my rights and being left like a toy to this guy for any period and no matter what the compensation for that could be in the future. And I would be happy to use the empowerment of that same compensation to prosecute as much as I can the same people who did not follow their duty in preventing or prosecuting these violations to my rights in exchange for enabling that compensation to reach me.
And even if I were to accept being left like this by those with the enforcement and prosecution power of the government, what about their duty to prosecute things violating the system? It is not like they are like a court in that it is not required to invoke itself unless it is invoked by one of the parties.    

One After Another

Tried to follow the resetting instruction but that was not possible because one of the modem lights was supposed to stay solid but kept blinking.  After some attempts, I searched

the internet (on my cell phone which was also what I used to write the two preceding posts) and followed a suggestion to disconnect the coax cable then connect it back which restored my internet connection. However, I am far from believing that was itself the reason without Charter making it the reason. Even if we assume this can also fit an on off problem like mine, seeing how things fit like somebody moving something with his hands and to his own reactions, versus on its own, and the history of Charter with me, would still prevent me from believing otherwise.

When this guy made Hulu violates my rights like they did I wanted to ignore that and focus more on that other task I am supposed to do within this period but apparently that option was also not left to me as he followed that by this. Now I cant bring myself to pushing to the background fighting back against this corruption like the past anymore.

BEFORE WRITING THE. MESSAGE BELOW I CONTACTED CHARTER AND THEY AGAIN STATED THAT THERE IS NO INTERNET SHORTAGE IN MY AREA. IN CASE CHARTER WANT TO CLAIM THAT IT IS SOME INTERNAL MULFUNCTIONING , IT IS CHARTER ITSELF WHO MOST PROBABLY MADE THAT MULFUNCTIONING IF ANY. IN A PREVIOUS TIME THEY CLAIMED IT IS MY ROUTER AND SHIFTED THE PROBLEM TO THAT SIDE. THIS TIME IWAS CAREFUL ENOUGH TO TEST CONNECTION ON MY COMPUTER DIRECTLY CONNECTRD TO THE MODEM AND THEY PROBABLY SENSED THAT SO THEY MAY CLAIM IT IS THE MODEM THAT NEEDS RESTTING THIS TIME. SUCH EXECUSES ARE HARDLEY BELIIEVABLE WHEN IT IS AN ALWAYS OFF PROBLEM LET ALONE WHEN SOMETIMES THERE IS A CONNECTION. ANY HOW I INTEND TO KNOW WHAT THEY MEAN BY RESSETTING THE MODEM IN ORDER TO ALSO REMOVE THIS EXCUSE DESPITE HOW IT IS UNBELIVABLE TO BE THE REAL PROBLEM EVEN IF APPLYING THAT WOULD RESTORE MY INTERNET CONNECTION.

NO INTERNET ACCESS

I DO NOT ACCEPT BEING LEFT ENSLAVED LIKE THIS. I WANT MY INTERNET ACCESS AND DO NOT CARE WHAT MESSAGE YOU ARE TRYING TO SEND ABOUT THE CONTROL OF THIS CORRUPTION GUY ON THE GOVERNMENT . SEND YOUR MESSAGES THROUGH OTHER MEANS THAT DO NOT AFFECT ME PERSONALLY WHICH WOULD ALSO MAKE THEM MORE BELIEVABLE THAN THIS UNNECESSARY STUPID PATH. BUT EVEN IF IT MAKES SENSE FOR YOU TO DO THIS I DO NOT ACCEPT BEING SUBJUGATED TO IT NO MATTER WHAT THE ULTIMATE OUTCOME COULD BE FOR ME. I WANT MY INTERNET ACCESS AND IWANT TO HAVE IT OR DISCONNECT FROM IT ON MY OWN CHOICE LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE. I DO NOT ACCEPT THAT THIS GUY CONTESTS MY AUTHORITY ON MY OWN THINGS INSIDE MY HOME JUST LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE. SO ANY GOVERNMENT ENFORCEMENT AND PROSECUTION THAT IS NOT TOTALLY CONSTITUTED OF CRAP NEED TO ACCT ACCORDING TO WHAT I WROTE HERE.

236: Those Thuggish Corporations

Hulu continued the kind of actions I described in the preceding posts then the old thug Charter Communications came back to cut my internet service for hours and hours continuously. Actually, for yesterday for example, I cant remember having internet service any time throughout the whole day until it was later than 1 or 2 am.

Those thugs may not care about the words and promises they give through their contracts. They also may not worry about any prosecution by the government. However, I wonder how sure they are that the enforcing of arbitration according to their contract works on even actions of this kind. So, in addition to the similarity with being a thug by not keeping their words, corporations acting like this may not be getting away with the kind of things they are doing here except for that the other side picks his battles and treats them as having no significance more than a fly that enters a room and makes one just want to get rid of its annoyance.   

235: And Again

Hulu did not even wait for tomorrow to delete this one which was just recorded to my DVR today. 

They are deleting my DVR recordings and even though they themselves usually show a message when scheduling a recording, stating that the program will be recorded and stay there until DVR space is needed, and I am far from exhausting my DVR space. Actually, this one is deleted while I have no program scheduled to be recorded to begin with. 

234: Hulu Deleted my DVR Recordings Without Permission

I had two tennis recordings from yesterday in my DVR space I planned to continue watching today except that I just found that Hulu deleted them on its own without my permission and without any need for DVR space.  I thought Sling was too bad but if Sling was dirt, Hulu is crap because at least Sling did not encroach on my own DVR space like that. It is like the land of lawlessness when it comes to corruption here.

Time to leave this crap but I only wish that they had shown such shameless violating to my rights behaviour not during the current tennis tournament.

Anyway, it is now two providers, Sling and Hulu, that were tested and found to be certifiably corrupt.
   

233: Corruption of Hulu again

I started watching a recorded soccer game this afternoon when suddenly it jumped from the beginning minuets to the thirtieth. I thought that could be because I set the game to be recorded not from the live broadcast but from a rebroadcast later and therefore it may have been cut to fit the designated time slot, so I continued watching until the fortieth minuet when I stopped to go and set the DVR to record another game. I then returned back to continue watching the earlier game but instead found myself back to the 22 minute which was in the part that was jumped and not shown earlier. I went back in the recording and this time all the game time that was not shown earlier is now there in my DVR.

232: The level of Corruption of Hulu

I kept silent on this Hulu doing things for this corruption guy until it reached the level I am experiencing now of making my DVR stuff not available for me. My stuff suddenly disappeared from My Stuff and even though the remaining recording time still reflects the recording.  

231: Sewer Sling freezes pictures on my TV

Related to post 227,  sewer Sling now freezes pictures on my TV and keeps the screen like that.

230: Not Even Looking Or In Proximity

One day it is that suicide allegation in the preceding post. Another day, it is that story I mentioned before about the guy who after being sentenced suddenly declared as a witness. Another time, it was making a deal with a complicit under the allegation that it was needed to get evidences against a guy who was falsely claiming sales, even though the records of the fake business are there and stores like Walmart and Costco were allegedly buyers. Suspicious or unjustified things like these should be found after gaining some special access and conducting an exhausting search then cause a big shock when shown to the outside, not appear like this to someone watching TV at his home without any effort to focus or search for the like. This is not the result of transparency but an expression of how much corruption is immune here.     

229: Showing corruption fighting here

Yesterday, I watched (on the HLN TV network) part of one of those crime investigation shows. The show was about a serial rapist who turned out to be a high executive of a corporation with apparently enough connections to get him a free pass even on crimes at this level. He himself tells those whom he rapes that he is a big thing and they could never succeed going against him. No or only very little prosecution happened to him until the good guy focus of the show, the investigator who was assigned to the case, found about the connection of that guy to those crimes and proceeded all the way to arrest the guy waiting for trial. This seems a nice turn of events and one would be waiting to see how the corruption that supported that guy would make him fare with the court system, but nothing of that happen. He did not even reach the court. What supposedly happened according to the show was that the investigator was surprised the next day when he did not find that guy in his cell. When the investigator asked he was told that the guy paid his bail and went out. To where? Supposedly to no other place but the cemetery where his father was buried to commit suicide there.

Can you believe this? Imagine the sedation toward corruption in this country if this was supposed to be a story about fighting it. The show did not even bother to go into things supporting that really what happened.         

228: The forgotten defrauded

How wonderful? This guy moves around with his connections inside the government without any accounting for the people he defrauds in the market where he is a continuous machine of manipulation and defrauding. Even for just my second case that I filed in New York, what about the other people he defrauded? Actually, while I complained about lost advantage, it is hard not to think that many others suffered loss relative to what they actually paid. That was not even a defrauding where you have a choice if only you control yourself not to trust a statement from somebody. Instead that was a a defrauding of the kind where somebody naked shorts and adds nonexistent shares. How can you defend yourself against that?  

227: Sewer Sling logs me out on its own

This is the third time it happens that corrupt sewer called Sling logs me out while I am watching, for no reason and I would be very surprised if it is not being done for this rat.

226: Again And Again And Again

This rat messed my router again. It is like nothing can be counted on him toward prosecution. This is CRAP not democracy. I am writing this using wired connection.
++++++++++++
Sorry, I meant, this is how one takes democracy to make crap of it.

Charter's Wild West Corruption

Charter has been keeping me without internet for a big part of the past three or four days serving this guy. Actually today I was allowed zero time access. Personally I cant get enough time to be with my thoughts. But is it legal for them to intentionally do that to a customer or is it more like fraud or doing intentional harm to others and they are merely counting on the corruption of the government that they will not be prosecuted?(Posting from my cell)

...
Just called the corrupt company and even they said that there is no internet access issue in my zip code.
...

Called again because the first time I jumped to telling them some of what I want them to hear then ended the call without listening to their excuse first. This time they said that there is no problem with my modem and questioned my wireless router. Like they said, I connected to the modem directly and this is how I am accessing the internet now. But this is even more obvious than the previous times this guy with or without their help intentionally messed my router and I wrote about it before. Like I said above, a big part of the past days I had no internet access but not throughout all those days. It was on for long period then off for long period situation.     

224: My Rights

Just like having someone inviting you to his home could make the difference between valid entering and trespassing or breaking and entering, I do not accept the appearance or pretending of corruption even assuming it merely affects my rights, not the system's, except where I gave my permission for that, and regardless of how the real reason could be positive for me. Confusing the real with the fake here may affect pointing out bad things elsewhere by raising the same possibility. 

The corrupt electric company doing it again

It is doing it again. The electric company is keeping this neighborhood without power and refuses to repair the problem,
for the pleasure of this guy. It has been between 5 and 6 hours or more now.

222: Corrupt Sling

The streaming service that seems to be going out of its way to divide and repackage cable channels for more money, also suspends its service to me until I make an input to change that, for this guy. Yesterday they did it with a message that some error has happened and today things lacked even more the suggestion of other than its participation, with the screen going black in the middle of the show without any reason. These are in addition to other things I have from the past also suggesting it making itself a sewer for this rat. Also, I think that when I signed for this service that there was the option for more than 50 hours of dvr but for the sake of this guy who noticed how I prefer more of that that is not the case anymore.

    

221: Seen Enough USPS Corruption?

I ordered some trees online. This guy, watching everything I do online (actually I think that I do not even have to be online because it is good enough for viruses he has in my computers to report on my activity as long as I physically do not turn off the router and the modem even if I disable access to the Internet for the computer I am using as mentioned in a previous post), contacted the low life seller and made him sends me a tree I do not want. I contacted the seller and he pretended that it was a mistake. I, of course did not believe that joke but still offered that seller to tape back the box and put it near my front door to be picked and returned back to him if he arranges for the carrier pick up. He accepted and I did what I promised to do but look at what this guy made the USPS do (of course I do not think that seller is not part of the game but this is not the issue here). They sent me a confirmation email that the package will be picked the next day. It was not picked and despite that the carrier came and put other packages I ordered from elsewhere near my front door where this package was waiting for pick up but still it was not picked up (This guy probably also wanted to repeat  making me have that same feeling when my food contribution in the bag designated for the pick up for that purpose was not picked up). If that is not enough, one day later he made the corrupt United States Postal Service sends me another email stating that the package pick up was completed successfully even though to this day, seven days later from the confirmed pick up date, it is still standing outside in front of my door. I may throw that tree away any time I want but look at this level of corruption by what is supposed to be a close to the government entity like this, that does not even mined being email documented and despite all what this entity had done and what was announced publicly about its other corrupt actions in the past.                 

220: Complete Vulnerability On Top of Having No Privacy

As if having your privacy on the internet taken away is not enough, imagine the knowledge of everything you do there available to such guy to go behind you and mess your things. And while such situation might be intolerable everywhere because of people who lack moral values or the integrity to hold themselves from seeking a potential benefit resulting from allying themselves with this guy, it is even much worse here because the alliance by itself, as a way for group identity, is extremely overpowering.  One very special thing I would like to cite in support of this is what those Impractical Jokers did in one of the episodes of the show and the commendable analysis and comments they did there. The show was about pretending to run away from something and seeking the help of a person to support you with that by lying and/or denying your presence to another person who comes a little later looking for you. A support there was given against various people including a little girl and a nun. The guys themselves commented saying it is amazing how you can so easily create an alliance (A level of introspection at the group level hardly seen elsewhere here). I actually think that my use of the word "alliance" today when talking about identity establishment and grouping was leaned from that.

Anyway, back to the issue that pulled this whole connection, I don't use the phrase "the spirit of the law" much but I think that, even with the absence of any other supporting argument, having no right for privacy over the Internet and leaving a person susceptible like this with no other alternative to protect himself there looks far from the spirit of the Fourth Amendment. 

        

219: Who is the one really laughing from above?

This idiot insists on some things he picks through his watching my actions on the Internet and thinks that he is secretly having fun manipulating the behaviour of some of those low lives around me while in fact I am the one watching him making himself like a joke. For example, when I sent the USPS a complaint about the incident mentioned below (post 217) he made them insist on phone contact. Another, example with better probability of him enjoying perceived secrecy in his actions happened today. He once watched me not complying with the demand of a company for pictures to honor its warranty and now I have that nursery company called Willis Orchards sending me the wrong tree then ask me for pictures and I have only very little doubt that it was his rat like work through another entity offering itself as a sewer for him (that include not only the request for pictures but also sending the wrong tree).        

218

Related to the earlier post, he could have allowed me to print my insurance card had I continued for a little more trying but the issue is not about mere physical efforts and associated frustration. It is about him being allowed to have this control over me and treat me like his toy whenever he wants.

Aside from all that one would still ask what he is trying to achieve doing things like this? If it is related to the issue at the court, what he wants me to do? I keep declaring how much time is not an issue to me and he keeps badgering me like this?What is that he wants me to say instead? The other way around?  How could that suggest strength in his position? Is there anybody asking him that or is it that they are only ready to degrade the system for that purpose? One in a strong position there would be happy for the delusion of his opposing side that his issue is still alive there and would try to keep it happy in that instead? What is it that he wants to suggest here? That the judges are on his side to the level of accepting that he does such things to me? How is it not counter productive to try to suggest them not just being so but also ready to show themselves with such unnecessary level of bias?

That what drives one crazy. It is not just that the system is being used for him but that it is being used for his service for what he himself play around and does not care to control himself to support that use.

Anyway, I took a long vacation from filling court complaints and need to get back on that track for whatever he does to me and take every case to the furthest judicial point I can. 

217

I have a live tree sent bare root which I am supposed to receive through USPS Priority Mail. It is now past due despite being in the distribution center of the main city here since the early morning hours. The delivery date had already failed twice from what it was said to be. Previously a bit of thunderstorm and some high sound gave this guy the excuse to cut my electricity for two days. Imagine what he can do where there is the excuse of a hurricane and flood (although not in this state) here where he had previously already made the mail carrier refuses to pick my food contribution bag with the USPS permit number printed on it (Link) for no reason. I still have that plastic bag and the cans of food I bought the day(s) before to put in it. 

From the day that shocking event of having this guy exercises his influence on an entity that is connected to the government as the United States Postal Service making it intentionally miss deliver my papers to none other than a Federal Court and the lack of sufficient government reaction afterwords, I reached the recognition of the latter as a sewage stuff not a real government.  

By the way, a little while ago those unbelievable past situations with false events fabricated and maintained as the public truth throughout the whole nation for this guy, occurred to me as  abhorrent to the level of calling them crimes against the honor and integrity of humanity in general.

216: cant print my insurance card from Gieco

I cant even establish a connection to print insurance id card from that lizard company. Not only that but I keep getting thrown back with my sessions expiring in seconds as if someone is playing with me and not even merely at the ISP level. So in addition to what I mentioned before about being unable to log to the app on the cell phone I cant even print an insurance card from my computer? What should I tell the cop if I get stopped and asked for insurance? That I could not print the card because his whole country is swimming in a corruption crap allowing this guy to do whatever he wants to this level? 

215: up to this moment

Today, I tried to log in to my Ameritrade trading platform (thinkorswim) but again started with the same situation I described in post 211. Then tried to log to my account online to inform them of that (assuming they are not part of it) and this time they chose to ask me one of those identity saved questions and it did not accept my answer probably also the result of the action of this rat. After that I tried to log to a bank account of mine and after entering my Id and password  the page did not load. Finally (up to this moment of course), my Amazon search returns long list of results and pages but I cant see any of them and this happened repeatedly.

If this rat is doing such things with the help of others choosing to act like corruption dirt or sewer for him to pass through but still within their legal rights to do so then my main purpose in posts like this is to also use my own right in pointing out the dirt. On the other hand my first priority is to hold all of those running the government system here responsible if any of this contain violation or encroachment on  my legal rights. One violation could be enough to make a person declare this let alone when being treated like a toy.