29

So will there be a prosecution on this guy for entering my car or should I just add it to the privileges given to him over me despite crossing a clear line like that?
Just in case some want to pretend they don't understand, of course I did not mean he doing that action himself.

28

That presidency contender was not talking about himself when he said that he can shoot somebody publicly and some would still vote for him or at least was not only talking about himself. What he was doing is sending threats on behalf of this guy here and his boss.

Like I said earlier the talker is the dummy of those guys. 

27

It seems as if this guy has crossed another line. Walking out from one shopping store yesterday I found that my little GPS monitor was not in its place. It was attached by a suction cup to the middle of the dashboard if not closer to the driver side. It was also in a position that is tilted a little bit toward the windshield. However, I found it on the passenger seat and despite how that seat was in a position pulled all the way toward the back of the car. I don't think there is a way one can see it fallen by itself to that position. That is of course is in addition to the much bigger probability for it to fall while the car is moving instead. I had it attached for several months and travelled over 300 miles highway fast and it kept in its place. 

Anyway, I attached it to the same place then drove to another store, probably not less than 2 miles away, and it remained perfectly in its place. I spent probably not more than 10 minuets there then walked out to my car to find that monitor not in its place for the second time. Although this time it was on an area that would have made more sense to fall on it but, still, only if the car was moving to counter the tilt toward the windshield.

I am always conscious to locking my car doors when I leave it. 

I attached it to the same place again then drove probably not less than 4 miles and parked in my garage and it is still perfectly in its place.  

      

26

continuing from the post below

By the way, volume manipulation is something that was mentioned directly from the thirties securities laws and prosecuting it may not even depends on a regulation from that entity. It is one that is the kind of in your face clear violation. So imagine what happens with depending on the oversight of this entity on things inside.  

Related to the case that reached the final court, aside from volume manipulation or what is in the complaint, I  also mentioned before the story about the test I wanted to do to see if I was really getting the shares I was buying from this guy. It began with what sounded like a change in his tactics making me getting the shares more easily. So I wanted to test if the brokerage firm I was concentrating my buying of the stock in my account with it was cooperating with the guy and showing me merely a fake number of shares in my ownership. While it still might not have assured things were correct, I tried to conduct a simple test consisting of transferring the shares to another brokerage firm which is generally an easy routine procedure. I tried but did not succeed with different brokerage firms. I also saw from their handling of the request and how things change from being like an automatic procedure when they initially take the request to even fabricating new rules just to avoid that transfer afterwards what made me give up on trying other firms. Things were like a joke and you can smell the conspiracy from beyond the Atlantic ocean. 

So did the executive authority take such things into its account regarding the balance with this guy before doing what it did for him?

And what about the story I mentioned before about how, instead of protecting investors this guy made the SEC contact me and even conduct a conference call with me in order to make sure if it was I who suddenly did all that buying in a stock of a company called Viking Systems? There, even before that conference took place any modest amount of hope for it not being for a corrupt purpose did not last the same day I received the invitation for it.   

25

continuing from the post below:

It is like they closed their eyes to what is happening there until they really forgot there are problems there and as a result thought of themselves as being in the weaker position instead.

I think I mentioned this sample story before. This guy plays the fake volume game freely and without much restrictions. So trying to leave that entity called the SEC with even less excuse for its corruption, I once sent them a tip or complaint about this guy fabricating a trading volume of 30 million shares in only the first hour for a penny stock that usually can hardly be seen exceeding 10 thousands shares traded throughout the whole day. Even in Bugs Bunny cartoon they wouldn't do something like that. Did those there investigate or even care? Does AlQeada investigates Terrorism?

24

Aside from the question of morality, if it was not part of satisfying a contract and doing their part, did those in the executive branch pay sufficient attention to their being in the EXECUTIVE branch before acting as if they were hostage to this guy and do the corrupted work they did? Did they really think that they do not hold the power to go with prosecuting this guy despite of all what he does especially with the market related activities? And why go far? What about criminal prosecution based on the original merits of my two cases?

But again, how can you see that when your selection to head the FBI is someone with that much connection to the market? It was as if one said to the like of this guy you already have everything, why bother, take the FBI with that too.

23

Continuing from the post below, isn't it interesting that despite adding this kind of behaviour, the pizza rat video was brought without caring about how much its similarity to me is in smallness in size relative to the carried  task and to him in its behaviour of passing through sewage and other dirty paths?     

22

By the way, speaking about his attempts to degrade my character I mentioned in post#20 and since many already chose to degrade themselves even much lower than the intended destination for my character by accepting such communications about me in the privacy of my own home from him, it may not be a bad idea to fight the deception of the psychotics a little bit also here. Much of that which this guy was conveying from that neighbor of mine would have been seen as no occasion created from scratch fabrications to a person sitting in his chair with me in the same room if there was one. I am using this assumption to show how applicable to be  reasonably called lying was what I called in the past misinterpretation. 

[(Added 1/12/16) I wrote the word "Much" in "Much of that which this guy.." thinking that it would be more than equivalent to "Most". I probably still venture prematurely to think that I mastered a use people make of a common word in this language]

21

Notice the guy's attitude of acting in playful way as if things never really touch him. The depth of the meaning of such attitude becomes better lighted when it gets combined with how much of the guy's interaction with me involves the creation of an environment for me from a God like position away from direct presence.