Aside from the question of morality, if it was not part of satisfying a contract and doing their part, did those in the executive branch pay sufficient attention to their being in the EXECUTIVE branch before acting as if they were hostage to this guy and do the corrupted work they did? Did they really think that they do not hold the power to go with prosecuting this guy despite of all what he does especially with the market related activities? And why go far? What about criminal prosecution based on the original merits of my two cases?
But again, how can you see that when your selection to head the FBI is someone with that much connection to the market? It was as if one said to the like of this guy you already have everything, why bother, take the FBI with that too.
No comments:
Post a Comment