67

I just want to ask supporters of Sanders this. Do you believe that he has been funding his campaign through the small donations from ordinary people as he alleged? If you don't then think what does that imply on the charachter of the person who falsely alleges such thing for himself and receives the advantage it gives him over his rivals? How about when he himself brings that contrast to mind when he uses pointing out things like the paid speeches against another candidate? How could such a fraudulent behaviour passes as OK thing?

Although thinking otherwise sounds like a joke, remember suspicion in things like these may not need to reach the level of certainty required to make judgment on the person because that is not the main objective when trying to make the best choice.

Six years ago, in reaction to what this corruption guy was doing, I talked about those whom I called deceptive psychotics (although there is much redundancy in that than meets the eye) and how much they depend on character deception and the magnitude of how convincing their character assumption. Even if I were to bring an example for that it would have been more like something the reader would look at externally. This situation on the other hand makes people live seeing how a character could be convincing to make some ignore the facts to this level. However, one may need to be careful that he still may not have seen much of this kind of convincing yet.