177

Even aside from what is happening in my situation, this is very far from how a system that is not corrupt should react to a suspicion of corruption. For example, how could it be that any of those, from top to bottom, with authority on the matter is accepted as trusted unless he provide a convincing answer for his position toward the deal with that woman mentioned in preceding posts? One could use such a deal as a corruption test for any official. Anyone who does not feel an urge to question it is either corrupt or, at best, much less effective than what is required for a position of authority.

Again, the claim that a case like that of fake selling, and not even for some kind of intangible things like stock shares instead of physical products, with all the leads it provides, could not be investigated without making that deal, screams outrageousness and suspicion. The outrageousness of that claim is high enough had it been all about investigating connections with companies overseas let alone when it is all about or at least include companies here like Sams Club and Costco.