179

Related to post 177, in case one somehow is unable to see how hard to believe the claim that making that deal with that woman was needed, here is the main defendant expressing it for you. He was heard on the recording "admitting that purchase orders were “fake” and claiming “divine intervention” was the only way to explain how he and co-conspirators had “gotten away with this for so long.”"(LINK)  

So if the fraud was that much hardly hidden without a tip about it, how can we accept the claim for the need to make that deal after the attention was directed to the probability of a fraud there? Having such thing pulled publicly where there is no dictatorship forcing it is huge degradation to democracy. 

Although  what plan could have been behind it does not change how much the need for making that deal is hard to believe, this still can fit with the plan theory suggested in the preceding posts. It could have been intended to defend against that they were supported or tolerated by the big guys or law enforcement despite knowing the fraud. This purpose could even have had higher priority than at least part of the one stated for the theory. The admission could also fit the theory in suggesting how much the speaker was bound to come to the authority like that woman except that she went first by herself.