Related to post 187, I was focusing on the defensive aspect of my side when I said that I cant, even with the limited domain of only its interface, sufficiently see that absent judge claim against me. Otherwise it is a huge understatement. No one in this guy's place acting seriously to resolve the issue more than toying around and showing off would like to take such a risk of suggesting to the opposing side anywhere close to this a probability that the court and/or its judges are holding themselves in such position for the case of the latter. I continue to struggle in whether this absent judge claim was done for the guy or was the guy required to accept it (still talking at the level of merely its interface).
No comments:
Post a Comment