197

It seems that the behaviour I described in post 195 about this recent calling for the cops suggests the involvement of the corruption guy rather than a mere  discrimination like the previous examples. It is hard to see that a cop would unnecessarily invoke that discussion of  crime or not crime and direct his attention toward the person like that second cop did if the motive is discrimination. If it involves a violent action or an insult toward the discriminated person then the trade off with the psychological inconvenience of directing the attention toward the latter might be convincing but just for the sake of arguing like that for a cop, it does not seem so. The only explanation that seems to fit good here is that that action was intended to add another layer of protection and service for the corruption guy whom I would hardly expect to have let things go without making a contact to pull the police to his direction after seeing me contacting it regarding the matter if he was involved. The first cop might have not been involved or was also seeking serving this guy but after seeing his level was achieved, he wanted to upgrade to that sought by his comrade. Both scenarios also fit the time order of the events with the second cop arriving less than a minute after the first, because the first cop might have been dispatched before receiving the communication related to serving this corruption guy or that the second cop was sent merely for adding support to that purpose. I have twice before called for the cops to come in this city and in both cases only one cop in one car were sent and it does not seem that they are inclined to send two cops and in separate cars for no reason (The part I mentioned suggesting more than one cop is a special occurrence resulted from me continuing communication and complaining about their own behaviour toward me).