272: The Question In Post 271

The answer to the potential for a need to generate new  objections, in the question in the preceding post, could be that objecting to management needs to be done in terms of asking them to do the correct thing related to some issue, rather than in terms of stop doing a wrong thing. This way management will enter the state of unacceptable behaviour after the first objection and will not exit that state until they remove all reasonable doubts related to the matter that gave rise to the initial objection, and therefore no further objections related to more clear wrongs associated with the same matter would be needed.    

It seems that, depending on the type of wrong, there could still be a good purpose to asking management to change even a clear wrong action before filing a lawsuit. That is because a corporation needs a purpose in order for a definition for what is and what is not for its benefit, to exist. That imply that if a corporation is registered as being for profit, for example, then any deviation from that purpose would be a wrong thing even if all shareholders were okay with that deviation. But even though it may be technically required,  it is impossible to follow that purpose to the max. Therefore I should have put my question below in terms of how much a thing is clearly unacceptable to shareholders rather than being just clearly wrong. Because otherwise management can do irreversible damage if allowed to do anything  unless they recieve an objection first.   
Back to the first part above, I might have exaggerated the technicality there. That is because what is needed could be  just to let management know that they need to correct something wrong until it is in an acceptable stage. For management to Know that there is such intention behind the objection it receives may not need a language at a contract making level like it is suggested in the first paragraph above. Nevertheless, it does not seem like a bad idea to take such a precaution. 

271: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 12: Correction To The Preceding Post

I should have noticed the lawsuit option earlier. That is because the only path for that that seems to be readily available argument wise is the derivative path (on behalf of the corporation) and that requires asking management to correct the action, first. Still it is not a bad idea to start doing this now in case they want to continue this closing stores everywhere game for some more time. So based on this I do not see that I can do much with a lawsuit at this time and therefore no longer sure I am going to do so . Also, contrary to what my talk about class actions lawsuits may suggests, any recovery obtained through the derivative path is for the corporation not the shareholders directly. 
On second thought, if a wrong as obvious as this requires asking management to correct their action, before filing a derivative lawsuit, wouldn't that open a potential for an endless process here? They could correct only a fraction of the problem. So, in that case, would correcting that resulted new thing also requires asking management again to correct their action? If no, then wouldn't that be based on that it is an obvious wrong? So why was it required to ask management to correct their action toward that first obvious wrong at the start?    

270: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 11: Big Conspiracy, Bigger Response

That what could happen to those business accomplices if their shareholders sue them for their closing or lowering their businesses without a reason like this, especially department stores. What could be better than suing for your benefit while doing good to the nation by teaching corruption a good lesson? If they want to argue back that they were following executive orders, they should be asked about why then they did not challenge those orders at the courts. But shareholders need to be very careful about what lawyers they select for class actions and even then they may need to very carefully question the actions of those lawyers and research carefully if they are really in their best interest. Then the cases should be followed all the way to the supreme court if needed.
Although anyone can get in a similar position by buying shares of those companies, I still do not feel good toward not using the authority I have here as a shareholder, against this corruption, after all the criticism I did to those in the government who do not stand to corruption despite how this country desperately need that. So although I do not wish to add more things to this kind of my to do list, especially with the special impediment I get from this corruption guy, I think that I am going to file at least one derivative lawsuit against  one nationwide department store. It may not contain much more than telling the court hey look no reasonable person can see this widespread closing to make sense. 

269: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 10: Flipping It Back

I wonder if the participation of businesses in this game and  their conspiracy on their own shareholders by not running, or closing their stores, can be flipped back on them with lawsuits. For example, how can those big chain retail stores that closed their stores everywhere counter the argument that that cannot be seen as being done in good faith for the benefit of their shareholders?      

268: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 9: The Smooth Cooperation

Do you really think that if there were not a big nasty conspiracy behind the scene, there would be this much acceptance to close businesses, by their owners? Are they really that convinced to make such sacrifices because of a reason as weak as this? Because they are ordered to do so?  I think that if this situation were real and many businesses are themselves not part of the conspiracy, you would have seen lawyers representing companies camping overnight at the courts  to object on receiving such orders, especially the big companies. Actually, here for example, not only that I never heard about refusal and enforcement for those orders, I am still not sure we have enforceable orders in that regard to begin with.

267: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 8: I Warned You

For whoever honestly not trying to burden the country and create artificial recession to help the wealthy corrupt have their way with the stock market (Although this aim itself could be a minor thing in comparison with not implementing the targeted protection, pointed out in the preceding post, for the two more vulnerable groups, instead of this mess and wasting of effort and resources while letting that number of deaths occur in those two groups) : I warned you. I told you that although the falsification that is going on around me in relation to my issue with the corruption guy is less than a joke in its effect on me personally, how can you be not worried that similar games could be played with more serious issues? It seems like it did not take long for the result of that encouragement to lead to this unprecedented level of country wide misleading and  fake show.

266: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 7: Choosing The Harder Path

From as soon as it was recognized how it is less likely for this virus to be deadly for other than those with pre existing health conditions and the elderly, why didn't the protection be focussed on this group? We could have pointed out that fact to the public then asked people with preexisting medical conditions to come forward in order to protect themselves. In addition to the less restrictions on the rest and less burden on the economy, those two vulnerable groups could have been better supported financially and that in turn would support the effectiveness of this path of dealing with the issue. 

Nobody was arguing against the quarantine for the infected. So why was there such emphasis on dealing with the issue in terms of not transferring the virus instead of not receiving the virus? Why the clear and stronger path of having one taking care of himself was replaced with the more confusing and weaker path of taking care of others? Why choose what is much more undefined, and more dependant on morality here? Job adds, for example, as much as they can provide an enticing pay, are very far from from showing this self serving information in the background to the public serving, like here. It seems that the harder to implement path was intended here to magnify the problem.  
Even without being sure about that virus related thing, mentioned at the beginning, we should have looked for if there is enough probability to make the path described here our next step instead of jumping directly to or  continuing what we are in now.  

265: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 6: Market Data

Even aside from how a pandemic may have just a transitory effect on the economy, the preceding post should not be taken as accepting the economic data resulted from this artificially affected economy as belonging to the original. It is beyond ridiculous to tell businesses to close and people not to go out unnecessarily, then bring data like the unemployment filing and retail sales as representing the real economy like they do without those directives . So despite how the related news may be presented in a form that suggests a direct link between this corona virus and some economic data, one may need to pay attention to the intermediate link mentioned above. 
By the way, I wonder how many of the business owners or mangers, especially those at the big corporations, are so cool about closing their businesses, because of the relation they have with those who want to affect the stock market with this corona virus thing.       

264: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 5: The Pandemic Underneath

The whole country was hijacked like never before in its history and got its economy legs broken, for no reason except to serve the corrupt forces with the financial power in bringing the effect of the resulted artificial recession to the stock market. 

You people think that with a tyranny system you get a manual that shows you how to judge everything the government does or an alarm that sounds when the action of such government is not really intended to serve the people? Many times a tyranny government justifies oppressing its people with a purpose lacking complete proof for being misapplied, more than the purpose claimed in our current situation here lacks such proof. All what you get left with there is just the sense of not finding what is being done sufficiently reasonable and making much sense, which you cannot afford to ignore.        

263: The Sewage Called Capital One

Look at This on the go corruption of this company. There was nothing different in my login and even if there was I never signed to two step verification with them and even if I have signed for that I do not use this number because it is a landline not a mobile number. This sewage itself does all its communication with me through an email address which is now replaced with a phone number I never use with them and for a process I never chose to begin with. This is something that suddenly appeared from nothing. It is not  the not recognizing the computer verification which I always use for it that same email address to which this sewage itself communicates all things to me which is now not even given as option. This whole message shown in the link is entirely new to me and I have never seen it or even seen the like of it anywhere else before. Because they are excluding my email for their "verification" as if they are my email provider and therefore phones are the next degree in verification. But they made it on the go for this other sewage, the corruption guy, because I just sent email to the company called Phone Power about the shown phone number telling them that I will inform my credit card company about how one cannot delete his credit card information on their website (I wanted to do that after requesting cancellation). So this sewage made the other prepare all this on the go for me in probably less than 2 minutes.

Now I cannot access my account there even if I just want to end any relation with them unless I tolerate them forcing this on me and this sewage forcing his will again and again and again.
Also, if I click that I do not have access to those options they require me to call them.  

Before, this sewage company disabled my card while I am far in a different city but I continued with them trying to give things another try.

I just spent over two or three hours frustrating on merely accessing an account I have for absolutely no lacking on my part. 

262: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 4:The Increasing Death

Trying to see more clearly how much of what is going on is rooted in corruption, yesterday I directed my thinking toward the increasing death of this pandemic here. It really seems to even make some unwise looking protection measures understandable. But later I noticed how I am missing something big here. We did not start looking at these statistics from the start of the spread of the virus. It seems like we were intended not to go through the issue of this disease gradually but instead receive it more like a shock. That connects with why the matter was not brought to the forefront like this earlier and the issue of testing availability and the length of time it takes to reveal the result. Let the disease progress then bring attention to it so that things look more scary. 

According to the world wide "Total Deaths" chart Here one can see how much we started looking at things from when the effect of the virus started to intensify.  

This site here makes comparison between the death rate of this pandemic and that of 2009 starting from the first reported death. It seems like it is trying to make use of the strategy described above. Because according to Wikipedia the first infection for the 2009 pandemic was confirmed in March 28, 2009, while, also according to Wikipedia , with this pandemic, the same happened on  January 20, 2020.   
By the way, one may need to pay attention to the difference between death rate as applied directly to people and the one applied to the infected (Which I think is called Mortality Rate).      

261: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 3: H1N1 Pandemic of 2009

60.8 million cases, 12469 US deaths and 151700-575400 world wide deaths according to estimates Here. Additionally,  according to This , vaccine  was not developed until mid september 2009. So, how many remember even knowing about this at the time, let alone having it brought into focus and making it require stopping businesses and holding people at their homes like this? Maybe because we just had the recession  of 2008 and nobody wanted to bring down a stock market that went like crazy up?

260: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 2: Testing

The situation of testing for this corona virus thing here does not fit the level that exists in this country in science and technology in addition to the resources that seems to be ready to be allocated for this purpose as evidenced by the stimulus bill passed last week. On the other hand it connects nicely with the preceding post and the strategy of keeping the people away from real facts in order to show a big enough monster in that darkness. This article shows how the testing development here was late compared to other parts of the world while This article speaks about the backlog and how long testing results take until revealed in California. The latter added to my connecting the availability of testing with the scaring game that seems to be going on, questioning the time it takes to reveal the result (not just in California but in general) under the same light. However, while it still may not hide the big picture, one needs to pay attention that with regard to the time it takes to reveal the results, it is not one fixed fit with the scaring theory I am making, but depends on the situation. It is about the number of positive compared to negative results in addition to some compromising to avoid suspicion.

It is also interesting how things in the second article suggest

pre planning and arrangement for the results not to be revealed fast. 

259: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy

With regard to the direct intentional level, initially I thought about only what seems to be an attempt to manipulate people with this  corona virus thing through interpretation. But now I feel like seeing that being done at the presentation level and a wide conspiracy. I clearly got enough of that kind and do not need any addition but lets take some steps back and look at our situation with this corona virus thing. Although I did that before, I want to start here with questioning the wisdom of the stay at home advice. Why is staying home the better alternative for protection from this virus? If someone has the virus, would not the probability increase to give it to related people if they all stay home? People get physically close to those related to them much more than they do that with strangers. And regardless of which approach to protection from this virus is better, don't they all share the purpose of preventing people from unnecessarily getting close to other people as practically as possible? So why should the advice here be given at this implementation level?

I started to suspect a no good intention at the root of this talk about staying home when I connected it to how when I searched the internet I could not find any statistic about how many of the number of total cases were infections among relatives or people at the same residence. Actually that connection was preceded by connecting this inability to find that statistic with a CNN news story about how a 38 years old man died from this virus without having pre-existing conditions because in that same story they mentioned that the wife also tested positive for the virus while the daughter still waiting for the test result. Speaking about sample stories, another one came today also from CNN about 70 college students who went to mexico for spring break and how 40 of them returned with corona virus infection. But if statistics have or presented more with that lacking mentioned above, how much one can depend on cases brought as samples here? 

Then look at how when you search for example Google for "coronavirus" you get a statistic on the side from wikipedia

that include only total cases, deaths and "recovered". How often you find news conveyed in the media in this manner. One often finds news stating that for example three people injured in car accident and were taken to hospital and two of them at serious condition. So how about a flu like situation being expressed not in terms of who is in serious condition but in terms of  who " recovered"? Some times one restore normal health after an intense sickness flu but there would still be something like for example a cough that keeps lingering for weeks. On the other hand This site list 95 percent of cases as mild for this corona virus. And in addition look at what This site reports about the common flu that "This season CDC estimates that, as of mid-March, between 29,000 and 59,000 have died due to influenza illnesses". 

All of this suggests intentional effort to install fear  and see this corona virus thing as much bigger than its real size. It seems to be a large scale conspiracy. Thanks to what happen to my own personal situation with another thing, I learned to disregard or consider for the opposite direction, the role of the media to be honest and state the real facts, enough to have no problem in seeing this at this scale. But of course, there could be people unknowingly participating everywhere. 

What could be the reason for such conspiracy. I think it is to negatively affect the financial market in order to gain better ownership of stocks after the economy improved and the stock market moved like this. The DOW moved from less than 9000 in 2009 to over 29500 in February this year. It seems that the economy was so good that big financial guys became in sever need for something to scare people away from the market so they decided to make the best use of this corona virus thing by presenting it as discussed above. Actually, what I mentioned here was preceded by signs I noticed within the financial market itself.    

        

258 Charter Again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Again Charter cut my internet connection and this time I am using it for trade stocks and cannot afford one minute of losing connection not hours like here until this corruption guy allowed me to connect. Again, does not being selectively targeted like this deserve prosecution by the government?

Charter keeps repeating this again and again and again. I never known something similar happening even once for someone else but it is a common occurrence to me. Why is it okay for this to happen to me? Why no body care to prosecute? Because it is not important? Okay you may not be interested in teaching corruption like this a lesson but do not you at least care that I should get internet service like other people? So when will you prosecute or at least tell an entity like this not to do such corrupt things or it will be prosecuted?   

When will you do that? If I go with another internet provider but this corruption guy make them do the same thing, would you prosecute then? Lets see. 
Not only I lost or missed in the market whatever I missed or lost because of this internet cut but it is now hard for me to focus on the work because of being frustrated and feeling like enslaved.