Trying to see more clearly how much of what is going on is rooted in corruption, yesterday I directed my thinking toward the increasing death of this pandemic here. It really seems to even make some unwise looking protection measures understandable. But later I noticed how I am missing something big here. We did not start looking at these statistics from the start of the spread of the virus. It seems like we were intended not to go through the issue of this disease gradually but instead receive it more like a shock. That connects with why the matter was not brought to the forefront like this earlier and the issue of testing availability and the length of time it takes to reveal the result. Let the disease progress then bring attention to it so that things look more scary.
According to the world wide "Total Deaths" chart Here one can see how much we started looking at things from when the effect of the virus started to intensify.
This site here makes comparison between the death rate of this pandemic and that of 2009 starting from the first reported death. It seems like it is trying to make use of the strategy described above. Because according to Wikipedia the first infection for the 2009 pandemic was confirmed in March 28, 2009, while, also according to Wikipedia , with this pandemic, the same happened on January 20, 2020.
By the way, one may need to pay attention to the difference between death rate as applied directly to people and the one applied to the infected (Which I think is called Mortality Rate).
By the way, one may need to pay attention to the difference between death rate as applied directly to people and the one applied to the infected (Which I think is called Mortality Rate).
No comments:
Post a Comment